There's too much emphasis on SPAM on the internet and not enough on the rights of individuals to speak out using whatever means there may be at the speaker's disposal. Shutting odwn individuals who want to speak makes the whole net more heavily weighted toward those who already have printing presses.
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200303/msg00405.html
For this advisory:
http://www.eff.org/Cases/Intel_v_Hamidi/20030311_eff_pr.php
EFF amicus brief in Intel v. Hamidi case:
http://www.eff.org/Cases/Intel_v_Hamidi/20020820_eff_hamidi_amicus.html
Documents related to Intel v. Hamidi case:
http://www.eff.org/Cases/Intel_v_Hamidi/
Trespass to chattels analysis:
http://www.eff.org/Cases/Intel_v_Hamidi/20011218_eff_trespasstc_analysis.htm
l
Intel v. Hamidi website:
http://www.intelhamidi.com/
Former and Current Employees of Intel website:
http://www.faceintel.com/
ACLU brief in Intel v. Hamidi case:
http://www.aclunc.org/expression/intel-brief.html
Spam's Cost Escalates -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17754-2003Mar12.html?referrer=email
The flood of unsolicited messages sent over the Internet is growing so
fast that spam may soon account for half of all U.S. e-mail traffic,
making it an increasing drain on corporate budgets. -The Washington
Post
Filter: The Wrath of Spam -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19840-2003Mar13.html?referrer=email
8:48:31 PM 
|
