| |
|
Monday, January 16, 2006
|
|
Wikipedia has this description:
A system of record is an information
storage system (likely to be a computer system) which is the data
source, for a given data element or piece information. The need to
identify the Systems of Record can become acute in large organisations,
where Management Information (or MIS) systems have been built by taking
copies of output data from multiple (source) systems, re-processing the
data and then re-presenting it for their own business uses.
Where the Integrity of the data (element) is vital, it must either be
extracted directly from its System of Record or be linked directly to
its System of Record. Where there is no direct link with the System of
Record, the integrity, and hence validity, of the data is open to
question.
[ System of
Record, wikipedia]
I'd argue that the term is really about how the age old records
(births, deaths, deeds, citizenship) are parts of systems of recording.
We rely on the paper document (the record) because we trust the system
that created it and sustained it (the system of record).
Now, in digital form, we think we have something new, something
transient that we need to lock down.
We do, but it's the system as much as the digital "record."
The record - digital or paper or parchment - has little value
unless we have a method to assure us and future participants
that this record, created this day, about this event, by this person or
persons
is a reliable record
through time.
This need isn't new.

Even if the form is.


12:28:39 PM
|
|
I've been posting "news" items without much comment. I ponder why,
resolve to comment more. Then don't.
I can't really expect others to view this as a serious blog if all I do
is re-headline what the prospective reader reads every where. So what do I
add?
The reality is that we, all of us, have a tendency to think about a
problem in isolation.
I'm trained to think about "systems" - but, still, systems in
isolation.
But we live in a world where no system is truly isolated.
This winter's fresh fruit in the grocery store down the street comes
from South America
& the fresh shitake mushrooms from China. That's how global the
economy has become.
The health care system of the United States is not isolated from that
of China, India or Europe.
A decade ago I knew a German fellow who'd worked in the US nearly all
of his adult life.
He'd retired here. But once a year he went to Germany for a health
checkup,
even for a hip replacement.
Now we expect Wal-Mart to be competitive but play by US rules,
not by International economic reality.
True, they helped create this economic reality,
but to expect US companies to adhere to U.S.A. 20th century business
models
in a 21st century international market is to doom all of the USofA to
3rd class status in the coming decades.
That's the comment for today.
The Question: How do we adjust from being the "super power" to being a
top tier competitor in an international market place?
What do we do to adapt to the digital world - the world where market
changes are instant and constant?
What does environmentalism mean now?
Does the term "organic" food mean anything?
Does "universal" health care or "universal" social security have a
place?
As
noted earlier today, we are now an Agent Nation, not an Owner
Nation.
So how do we have checks & balances on the agents for different
systems?
Not just those with narrow interests but with those that interact in
complex ways to alter our life.
It comes down to, I think, the intersections where we barely notice te
interaction of systems.
Or the resulting unintended
consequences.
11:57:51 AM
|
|
Cristian Miceli is an IT lawyer in the UK. This article is a roundup look at software patent issues in 2005. It addresses the question of whether software patents are beneficial or counterproductive. Its intended audience is other IT lawyers, but the rest of us can enjoy it too. As an attorney, Miceli says he believes in intellectual property rights, and "as part of this, I see the benefits that patents can potentially bring in certain sectors. However, as one law professor recently commented, 'good policy does not just consist of "more rights"; it consists of maintaining a balance between the realm of property and the realm of the public domain'. I've formatted it so that you can click on a footnote number and read the footnote, then click on the number and return to the main text. You can also download the paper, if you prefer to read it as a PDF, here. [ GrokLaw]
11:41:51 AM
|
|
Only work if there is a feedback loop.
No record is bad. No feedback (correction) loop is worse.
Lacking proof from most of the states,
federal officials are concerned that many foster children are not being
visited regularly by caseworkers. [ washingtonpost.com
- A Section]
11:27:19 AM
|
|
USATODAY.com - Dozens of
drug-prescription plans. More than 8,000 mutual funds. Fixed-rate,
interest-only and option ARM mortgages. Regular 401(k) plans vs. Roth
401(k)s. Countless flavors of bank accounts.
Choice is a hallmark of capitalism, and most of us would agree that having too many choices is far better than having no choices. A growing body of research, though, shows Americans have become so besieged by choices that many feel paralyzed and confused.
[ Yahoo! News: Business]
Magazine
Preview: 10,000 Channels
"Startups Take on Google and Yahoo to
Solve Video Search"
Red Herring, January 23, 2006
print issue
When computer science professor Avideh Zakhor and her graduate students
set out to create a video search engine at the University of
California, Berkeley, in 1999, their web crawling ultimately resulted
in a stockpile of some 45,000 clips. Fast-forward six years, to a point
where Yahoo alone boasts 15 million clips in its video repository....
[ Red Herring]
11:21:57 AM
|
|
One of my fav references.
Legal
Affairs has a fantastic collection of essays about various
cyberspace related legal issues by some of my favorite writers about
the subject. Zittrain's
piece outlines the beginning of his soon to be completed book. It
shall be called Z-theory. Goldsmith
and Wu give a short precis of their soon to be released book, Who
Controls the Internet. And Julian
Dibbell has an extremely funny story about sleuthing the tax
consequences from the virtual economy.
Strongly recommended reading.
11:17:48 AM
|
|
10:54:23 AM
|
|
10:42:13 AM
|
|
Did I mention patents? Community?
...Patents are intended to encourage
the disclosure of inventions to the public by granting the inventor
exclusive rights to benefit from his or her invention for a limited
period. This helps promote innovation because an idea or invention can
have many potential benefits beyond those originally imagined by its
creator. In an increasingly collaborative, interconnected global
economy, there is a compelling and growing societal interest in
bringing new intellectual property to the marketplace as soon as
possible and maximizing the overall amount and quality of innovation.
However, if the quality of the invention covered in patents is lowâo[per thou]that
is to say, neither significant nor newâo[per thou]then such patents actually
undermine the common good, thwart the very innovation they were
intended to foster and, collectively, may seriously erode trust in our
IP laws and institutions. That is why significantly improving the
quality of patents is such a high priority for us all, and why
improving patent quality is the focus of the initiatives we are
announcing this week....
10:30:06 AM
|
|
Caveat
investor
Jan 12th 2006, The Economist
print edition
Individuals are taking on more financial responsibility, not least in
providing for their old age. Maybe they should be better prepared
Despite all the activity, experts
caution against putting too much faith in financial education. "This is
not the silver bullet that some people think it is," says Ms Smith. No
campaign can hope to reach everyone. In addition, although those with
more knowledge of finance tend to save more and make higher returns on
their long-term investments, the strength of the effect is not clear.
100%
Rotten
by G. Pascal Zachary, Business 2.0
America's cotton subsidy program has
morphed into a budget-busting mess so twisted it even sends taxpayer
money to the French. Now it threatens to ignite a perilous trade war.
Which leads us to a question for the U.S. Congress: Are you out of your
cotton-pickin' minds?
( more)
More and more, college courses offered
over the web for distance
learners are being snapped up by students who live close to campus.
Some schools allow it only with a legit academic reason; others say
fine, as long as it helps them graduate.
[ Wired News: Technology]
At nursing homes, the elderly get their
medication but those running the homes struggle to make sense of the
Medicare drug plan.
Two of eight regionally focused cancer
registries in England are
testing tools from InterSystems Corp. that integrate, validate and
manage information from hundreds of data sources for a rules-based
system called Entente.
[ Computerworld News]
7:47:54 AM
|
|
As we've made our economic system more liquid (a good thing)
we have also made it a less accountable system (a bad thing).
The "manager" or "agent for society" responsible for an socio-economic
cog has a different incentive than
the "owner" of a socio-economic cog (be it a business, a cooperative
venture or a public service activity).
Today's capitalism, however, has
departed, not just in degree but in kind, from its proud traditional
roots. Over the past century, a gradual move from owners'
capitalism -- providing the lion's share of the rewards of investment to
those who put up the money and risk their own capital -- has culminated in
an extreme version of managers' capitalism -- providing vastly
disproportionate rewards to those whom we have trusted to manage our
enterprises in the interest of their owners. Managers' capitalism is a
betrayal of owners' capitalism, a system that worked, albeit
imperfectly, with remarkable effectiveness for the better part of the
past two centuries, beginning with the Industrial Revolution as the
eighteenth century turned to the nineteenth.
Digital infrastructure is even more flexibile, creative, evolutionary
but it is even more difficult to have "ownership," "stewartship" baked
into the enterprise.
In a local, small community, we hear about every significant event (or
misadventure)
but as we become large, national, we lose the immediacy.
With international, digital infrastructure we have lost any clear,
immediate feedback.
And the "systems of record," the mechanisms to investigate events have
become obscure.
Transparent Systems of record have become key to workable communities.
And then communities scale and stretch but with honest feedback
mechanisms...
accountability is in the transparent, reliable record of events.
Accounting is about accountability. But there is more needed in this complex world.
7:13:50 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2006 Russ Savage.
Last update: 1/28/06; 6:12:08 AM.
|
|
| January 2006 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
| 8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
| 15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
| 22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
| 29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
| Dec Feb |
|
|