The Unproven Truth...
I do relate to this... specially where Stefano keeps using question marks I'm with him all the way. Just about none of the posed questions were not already dwelling my brain before (a lot less clearly expressed for sure) I've been mentioning him before, but good 'ol Kurt already new that one fool can ask a lot more pertinent questions then a thousand wise men could prove as being true, relevant, inapropriate or false... Only bad thing about that last statement is that it uses words as 'fool' and 'wise men' to falsly imply that (just) asking the questions is the easy part... So let me ask a question: Isn't the 'lawmaking practice' just there to stabalize and solidify what has been emerging as the most succesful (as selected by Darwin) way of being? Times change but argueably in a way controlled by anyone, history does enable the ones on top to solidify their position. But this can very well get in their own way and hampers their flexibility sooner or later, no? And if not, then that fact might just be Reality's prove that the style, pattern, philosophy was one to comply with rather then to compete with? Stefano's proposal to (formally??) let go of control and decentralize is one I'ld vote for right away. However it sounds a bit like 'organizing' the chaos. (which makes me remember the falseness in the word 'empowerment'). Seems like a battle that is lost before it is begun? Hm, the only way for me to keep some mental health in all of this is to flee to the axiom of 'INDESTRUCTABLE IDEAS'. No solidifcation or controlling process can make thoughts go away, or extinguish them. From there I would be comfortable that somehow all thoughts will eventually get their way and influence larger parts of human thinking. (Damn, that is as horifying as it is comforting! I'ld better stick to just posing the questions?) So were these ideas or just forgotten memories?
3:13:07 PM 
|
maandag 26 mei 2003
Still trying to figure out how Fien recognised herself as a rabbit... 
4:27:45 PM 
