|
|
Monday, December 09, 2002 |
|
Okay, I do have one more thing to say, since it seems to be hate and loathing day here at the old rhizomat: I do not like this Michael Moore character. Where is the thoughtful, intelligent, populist discourse of the Left, and how in the world did this illogical, hypocritical buffoon get the job as spokesperson for my political proclivities? I love class warriors of the 37% tax bracket. Here's a random quote from his website, discussing the motivations of the Columbine shooters: One reason the film is called "Bowling For Columbine" is that, after the massacre, all the pundits and experts started blaming all the usual suspects that are wheeled out for blame whenever a school shooting occurs—evil rock music (in this case Marilyn Manson), violent video games, and bad parenting. My point is that those scapegoats make about as much sense as blaming bowling. After all, Eric and Dylan were bowlers, they took bowling class at Columbine—was bowling responsible for their evil deeds? If they bowled that morning, did the bowling trigger their desire to commit mass murder? Or, if they skipped their bowling class that morning, did that bring on the massacre? Had they bowled, that may have altered their mood and prevented them from picking up their guns. As you can see, this is all nonsense, just as it is nonsense to blame Marilyn Manson. I will refrain from taking potshots at this attempt at 'reason', as it is like a bullseye painted on the side of a ruminant, a great sprawling target turgid with the muddy waters of mystical ideation and sloppy thinking, and therefore unworthy of my time. 8:43:04 PM |