Atomized junior

Dedicated to the smallest particles of meaning on the web
Atomized Links:



theUsual Suspects:




Terrifying face of the Other
(a bloglist)


Radio Radio
WMUC 88.1fm College Park, MD.
Streams:
high, low


WZBC 90.3 FM Newton,MA.
Stream
WFMU-FM
91.1 Jersey City, NJ; 90.1 Hudson Valley, NY
32k stream (low),
128k Stereo stream (high)


Subscribe to "Atomized junior" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Thursday, July 8, 2004
 
in-duced

A couple of times over the past week or so this news item has poked into portion of the newsphere I pay attention to Mac News: News: Copyright Bill Poses Threat to iPod's Future, There was a similar piece in the register on tuesday Hatch's Induce Act comes under fire | The Register, as well as a piece in PCWorld PCWorld.com - Tech.gov: Copy Crime and Punishment which was the best of the lot.

What all the fuss is about is a Bill S.2560 in the senate which contains language allowing civil lawsuits (presumably by our good buddies at the RIAA and MPAA) against corporations that Intentionally induce copyright infringement. All those involved are quick to say its meant to target unfiltered P2P networks, that its narrowly designed and narrowly intended. A phrase like intentially induce covers a lot of ground potentially and if released into the wild with no natural native predators, most of whom were killed off in the great hunt to Protect Intellectual Rights Against Theft and Expropriation, will cover that ground pretty fast. Applicability and precedence aside once a concept like this is out there its what an individual judge will buy in a given case and what the people will allow. Each round of RIAA lawsuits is larger than the last as the RIAA gauges the reaction and continues on.

I still remember the "hometaping is killing music/movies" campaign" and am aware the same people who are pushing this didn't want the public to have VHS or audio cassettes either. They'll be damned if they are going to let digital recording technology be released. Since it is already mostly out they are going to effect a rollback if it means they have to sue everyone out there who builds a device that stores electrons in a readable state. Yes, that probably does mean Apple, the iPod, and Steve Jobs; mostly for having the temerity to have ever suggested its your music in the first place. Do you suppose Pop music would make a sound if it were to fall over in an empty forest? What about if it fell over at Fort Reno park?

The Senators behind this grovelling at the feet of this corporate property rights management are Orrin Hatch and Patrick Leahy. Leahy... hmm. I guess VP Cheney could have been on to something.


11:39:18 PM    comment [];trackback [];


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
2006 Paul Bushmiller.
Last update: 10/21/06; 3:01:21 PM.
July 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jun   Aug


Prolegemma to any future FAQ.

Who are you again?
paul bushmiller
what is it exactly that you do?
at the least, this.
What is this?
it's a weblog.
How long have you been doing it?
3 or 4 years. I used to run it by hand; Radio Userland is more convenient.
Ever been overseas?
yes
Know any foreign languages?
no
Favorite song?
victoria - the kinks
RockandRoll? Favorite American song then
Omaha - Moby Grape
Favorite Movie
Billy in the Lowlands
favorite book?
any book I can read in a clean well lighted place
Is this one of those websites with lots of contentious, dogmatic and brittle opinions?
no
What do you expect to accomplish with this?
something

Site Meter