| |
|
Friday, January 02, 2004
|
|
Perhaps it is a little like the parable of "The Emperor's New Clothes"
by Hans Christian Anderson but in Psychiatry we have been using
the term "mood stabilizer" for many years and there has been no formal
definition. According to an article in the January 2004 Americal Journal of Psychiatry,
"the term "mood stabilizer" is widely used in the context of treating
bipolar disorder, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does
not officially recognize the term, and no consensus definition is
accepted among investigators."
It is proposed that a formal definition of a mood stabilizer should be
established and include two aspects: 1) efficacy in treating acute
manic and depressive symptoms and 2) prophylaxis of manic and
depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder. The authors of the article
conducted a review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of agents
to determine which if any agents meet this definition of mood
stabilizer.
Interestingly, the first (1994) American Psychiatric Association's
Practice Guideline for Treatment of Patients With Bipolar Disorder
defines mood stabilizers as "medications with both antimanic and
antidepressive actions" and the second edition (2002)
makes no attempt at a definition but rather asks the question, "is
there a more clinically and scientifically useful definition of a "mood
stabilizer"? Do newer agents (e.g., atypical antipsychotics and
anticonvulsants) have true "mood-stabilizing" properties?" So the newer
guideline leaves the question open for study and asks for a definition.
The AJP study takes up this charge and attempts to evaluate such a
definition from empirical evidence.
The authors identified 551 candidate articles, yielding 111 class A
trials, including 81 monotherapy trials with 95 independent analyses
published through June 2002. Lithium, valproate, and olanzapine had
unequivocal evidence for efficacy in acute manic episodes, lithium in
acute depressive episodes and in prophylaxis of mania and depression,
and lamotrigine in prophylaxis. However, only lithium fulfilled the a
priori definition of a mood stabilizer. Relaxing the quality criterion
did not change this finding, while raising the threshold resulted in no
agents fulfilling the definition. The analysis highlights the
need for continued research and a coordinated effort in establishing a
formal definition of mood stabilizer.
Am J Psychiatry 161:3-18, January 2004
10:54:24 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004 rsk.
Last update: 2/18/04; 11:55:50 PM.
|
|
| January 2004 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
| 25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| Dec Feb |
|
Links of Interest
 | Interesting Blogs |
 | Mental Health |
 | Medical Blogs |
|