OSNews reports "Microsoft funding of security report decried. Two researchers surprised the audience at a computer-security convention last month with their finding that a version of Microsoft Windows was more secure than a competing Linux operating system. This week, the researchers released their finished report, and it included another surprise: Microsoft was funding the project all along."
I heard about the report and I was really pleased that Microsoft may have finally started catching on with Windows Server 2003 in shipping a product that's reasonably secure out of the box. To say it is about time is a vast understatement. To claim that redeems Microsoft, or has any effect on the 500 million insecure Windows installations out there is wrong. From my limited experience with W2K3, it's a lot more difficult to work with, since lots of features are disabled by default, and turning them on is far from intuitive. It's pretty much too late for me. I've taken my business elsewhere.
5:29:57 PM comment []
Two interesting articles from Doc Searls' IT Garage: Doc has been banging the drum for a while on the theme of Do It Yourself Information Technology: DIY-IT. In Nonfriction, he ridicules the 'Vendor Sports' attitude of much of the information technology press: it's not Novell vs. WordPerfect, MS vs. Sun, it's 'how do I get this stupid document to print' out in the field. Andrew, you'll like this piece, as he quotes Guy Kawasaki as well as others. His second piece, Non-Profit Use of Open Source is an interesting story of how FOSS can fit in the the non-profit segment. Some good references to look into here, too. If you're not subscribed to Doc's feed, I encourage it. There are some potent ideas brewing here.
4:01:41 PM comment []
