OSNews also points to Linux Insider: How Linux Saved Microsoft. "Rob Enderle has an commentary at LinuxInsider discussing the effect Linux has had on Microsoft. An excerpt: "As I look at how Microsoft is changing to address the Linux threat, one that may actually turn out to be no more real then Netscape's was, I can't help but see how Microsoft has dramatically benefited from it -- and much more broadly so than they did from the rise of Netscape."
I think Enderle is right on when he talks about the effect that Open Source is having with Microsoft. "Competition breeds Innovation." However, I think he falls off the deep end in his last section "False Threat?" where he tries to explain what Open Source is.
... "open source" which, in turn, is based on a false concept. This concept is that people actually want to look at source code. No, it's that people want the security of knowing that the code is there for a community to maintain, support and enhance, that a monopolistic code owner can't take away the freedom to run the code they have.
Finally, we know that what is largely holding the open-source community together is a dislike for Microsoft. Little holds the community together! :) But the individuals who choose Open Source each choose it for their own reasons, often freedom of choice, freedom to experiment, freedom to extend, integrate, modify and hack together the solution to their own problem. It's not about Microsoft, nor Computer Associates, nor IBM, nor any other one target.
... unless something dramatically changes, by 2015 we'll be largely wondering what all the fuss surrounding Linux was really about. Perhaps, Rob. See you in 2015 and we can compare notes.
1:45:03 PM 
|
|
