Updated: 5/3/06; 3:47:38 PM.
Ted's Radio Weblog
Mission: Interoperable. Competition breeds Innovation. Monopolies breed stagnation. Working Well with Others is Good.
        

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

From Microsoft Watch from Mary Jo Foley: Is Microsoft's Silent Treatment Appropriate for Patches?. "Microsoft says it is withholding certain details on security vulnerabilities to protect customers from bad guys. But critics say Microsoft's cone of security silence only increases the risk for everyone."

An interesting article. It claims that Microsoft is keeping its bug count artificially low by silently slipstreaming multiple bug fixes into the patches and, worse, not disclosing the details even to their "trusted partners." The bad guys know what's patched. Why shouldn't we? Shouldn't "Trustworthy Computing" require more transparency than this?
10:33:02 PM    comment []


© Copyright 2006 Ted Roche.   

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

  

 

April 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Mar   May


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Ted's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Blogroll
miniXmlCoffeeMug.gif miniXmlButton.gif Byte
Gillmor's Blog