Eric Norlin has more about NEA, of course:
...what the internet gives us now is a blunt instrument for carving out definitions of ownership and control. What digital identity holds out as a promise is the possibility of refining and making more subtle those definitions......and if done right, it won't scare the shit out of people either....in fact, it will empower them to greater levels of commerce and innovation.
Good stuff. He also points to more from Mitch on the same subject, as it applies to current lawmaking in the State of Washington.
Mitch also says Doc's "OurIdentity" idea is good, but I'd suggest that the right phrase to describe T2 is "Negotiated and temporary (or temporal)."
That's fine, but also nonmemorable. Remember, marketing is arson. If your idea isn't combustible, it won't catch. I'm not sure about ourdentity yet. In fact, I'm not sure about the whole Digital ID conversation, which seems to have set fire to a relatively small group of people (yes, it's a big fire, but still).
Which is why I agree with what I said at DIDW a few months back: we need the killer app for DigID: an invention that mothers necessity. Without that, we're still using soggy matches. [The Doc Searls Weblog]
1:48:34 AM
|