The Raven Banner
| August 2003 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
| Jul Sep | ||||||
I actually ran into this absurdity yesterday, but delayed posting it until I could see if it was really so... alas, it is. Basically, the patent in question covers an ethical system, with direct application to artifical intelligence.
I don't really care what it's application is: how in the world can you justify patenting an ethical system? How in the world could the USPTO grant such a patent with a straight face?
If you still don't think the system in broken, read on ....
New Patent issued for Ten Ethical Laws of Robotics [Science Blog]
1:09:14 AM
comment []