|
|
Wednesday, March 09, 2005
|
|
| |
Reminds me of the prophet lack of honor in his own country Federal Whistleblower Office Faces Criticism.
Whistleblowers in the federal government are supposed to have a place
to go for protection from retaliation. It's called the Office of
Special Counsel. One of the recent complaints received by that agency
was filed by several of its own employees, who say they faced
retaliation when they raised questions about policy changes within the
agency itself. [NPR Programs: All Things Considered]
9:11:27 PM
|
|
The Need? Process, not Privacy Laws LexisNexis Reports Theft of Personal Data.
Identity thieves have compromised another company that collects and
sells personal information on millions of U.S. consumers, the latest in
a series of breaches that is throwing a spotlight on the practices and
safeguards of a booming data-collection industry. -The Washington Post By Jonathan Krim and Robert O'Harrow, Jr.. [washingtonpost.com - Technology]
Another one and another will come after this. The issue is not
that we need more laws or can assume that a piece of paper with some
kind of criminal penalties attached to violating what is written on it is are all that is missing to protect the
consumer. The issue is that companies are not prepared from a
process and resource perspective to have the kind of security and
social engineering vetting of customers and employees to ensure this
kind of thing doesn't happen. That information has value.
It isn't just bits and bytes of information sitting on a server
somewhere. Until we look at it the same way the bank does their money
in the vault or my valuables in the safe deposit box, we will continue
to have this kind of exposure of information.
The answer is simple to say but difficult to implement. This data
is a product and products have certain standards of accuracy and need for protection.
And, the creator of products have certain responsibilities for their
products in the marketplace.
11:34:02 AM
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2005
Judy Smith.
Last update:
4/22/2005; 5:19:23 PM.
|
|
|