|
|
Thursday, April 07, 2005
|
|
| |
GOP's moral agenda doubted.
WASHINGTON — The controversy over Terri Schiavo has raised concerns
among many Americans about the moral agenda of the Republican Party and
the political power of conservative Christians, a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup
Poll finds.
Read remarks from Ruy Teixeira, SK Bubba, Chris Bowers, and Oliver Willis. [memeorandum]
The revisionist history starts. Now, two weeks later,
the issue was about the rights of the disabled. When it was
happening it was about someone who was not in a PVS being murdered and
was tied to the decay of America and in conflict with the culture of
life the abortion movement represents to the religiious right. We'll
see if that plays to the moderates they are trying to keep from taking
the party back.
7:15:37 PM
|
|
The Fax of Life?
In comments to a previous post a....
The Fax of Life?
In comments to a previous post about marketers as liars and finding "truth," Aleah reckons (emphasis mine):A
funny thing is, the people who talk the most about lying versus telling
the truth, are often times the ones most full of bullshit... The pure
answer is sometimes the stuff we say when drunk, when talking in our
sleep, when a child, or when developmentally or emotionally injured. Everything else is filler.
What we SHOULD be talking about as marketers is over-consumption.
In the words, what we are convincing people to buy is contributing to a
giant pile of planetary garbage.... Go, Sister!
Me? I think companies have plenty of faults, but I've never been
one to believe that they create "artificial" need. The universe is
sublimely efficient; nothing happens without a quantum mechanical
reason. In other words, if somebody's buying a "useless" product, that
"useless" label is often applied by a non-consumer of said product--and
it's really simply non-understanding by the non-consumer. For example,
I don't buy Dale Earnhardt stickers to slap on my car because they
don't mean anything to me. He doesn't mean anything of note to me.
(Mansell or Schumacher? Different story.) But he does to lots of
people. So that product has its place in the grand continuum.
Aleah brings up a good point, but is it it the whole point? I thought not and said so:A
la that visual of Jung's Ego with its "hole" or void that we sense we
need to fill, many view "stuff" as being the answer. "Stuff" is easier
than self-awareness, quicker too, albeit ultimately a dud. But that's
not the *fault* of companies, it is just human nature and has been for
eons before the Dow Jones or Ad Age.
Now, if someone wants to tackle the third rail of poor parental
teaching and uncourageous, therefore, dishonest
cultural/political/religious leadership and their effect of generating
those nascent consumer/voids called children-cum-selfish-grown-ups,
well, I'd say that would be closer to the mark. But that's just me. Hmmm.
Poor prep of seed material. Lack of contextual understanding or
interior knowledge. Unsatisfying answers resulting from misperception
of the challenge or misunderstanding the question.
Don at Leadership Now has a piece called Coddlers tackling this very thing, but in the workplace itself...
Old fogies have always complained about “kids these
days.� But even fairly young and hip managers are increasingly
echoing such laments. The complaint from managers of all ages in all
walks of life that I’m hearing on an almost daily basis: Many young
people entering the workforce today come with wickedly
counterproductive attitudes. In particular, evil twins called Needy and
Fragility show up with frightening regularity.
The managers lament goes something like this: These kids don’t
want to take responsibility. They don’t want to do anything that’s
hard. They want positive stroking for the littlest accomplishment, and
literally cry at the slightest hint of criticism.
Sound familiar? It’s always unfair to paint a large group of
people with a single sweep of a broad brush. But something is going on
with the attitudes of the most youthful in the workplace. And it’s no
wonder.
Talk with educators about the challenges in schools these days, and
inevitably they end up pointing to the My Little Darling Syndrome. You
know, as in when a teacher or administrator calls mommy or daddy to the
school for a conference to discuss challenges with their little one.
The only response from adamantly defensive parents: “You are
either grossly mistaken or you simply don’t understand my wonderful,
flawless child.�
This has been going on for a while. And today, the effect of overly
protective, over-nurturing parenting is now showing up in the
workplace.... Now, if you've read this far, you must be interested in the topic. We could go in all kinds of directions from here:
1. Minimum requirements, maximal consequences. That parent with the
flawless child knows the child is not flawless, but any admission of
reality or culpability calls into question a succession of choices said
parent has made or avoided. Bad mojo for Mommy or Daddy's preferred
reality and a very unwelcome challenge to their parental effectiveness
with the uncomfortable empirical support that they are sitting in front
of that kid's teacher, and not to pick up an award. And they are
sitting there because they, too, probably were conditioned to ask: is
this gonna be on the test? Children taught or permitted to engage in
learning that way are in danger of becoming adults and workers who view
their world and commitments that way. Many unpleasant surprises ensue...
2. Situational non-awareness. The above penchant for
bullet-pointing the world relieves us from engaging with it, from
learning to feel and then trust our own assessment of dynamic
situations. Our senses and instinct convey to us a spectacular ability
to suss out threats and opportunities; to divine potential and often
unconventional avenues of exploration. These are primarily right-brain,
gestalt sensations and hard to describe inthe standardized (blandized
and boilerplated?) lexicon of business and secondary education. Oddly
enough, they are the root of creativity and, also, the foundation of
what business and branders call sustainable competitive advantage. (Difficult to copy, counter-intuitive,
first-to-market.) As we age to adult, we are implicitly or explicitly
told to ignore these non-discursive abilities and stay in the "real
world" of facts. But these abilities and their messages don't go away,
they're just "demoted." The remaining dissonance or tug of war leads to
what Thoreau called "...lives of quiet desperation." And to...
3. Speed kills. Neural connections formed by observation, info
assimilation and trial and error problem solving, and the patience
required to allow children the luxury of failure are all victims of our
current business/economic setup. Those parents, too harried (or just
immature) to more closely engage with said child are also harried at
work to "just get it done." Analysis and cognition are deemed a drag on
efficiency. The semblance of quality will do. Voila: Inert, nonsensical
bullet point manufacture and rote testing. The facsimile of educuation
and human development. Presto: the setup for future problems....
Phew. On that final note, Don's post led Christopher Bailey at Alchemy of Soulful Work to point us to Ready or Not, Here Life Comes by Dr. Mel Levine. A snippet from a fine, and fairly lengthy excerpt via MSNBC:We
are in the midst of an epidemic of work-life unreadiness because an
alarming number of emerging adults are unable to find a good fit
between their minds and their career directions. Like seabirds mired in
an oil spill, these fledgling men and women are stuck, unable to take
flight toward a suitable career. Some are crippled before they have a
chance to beat their wings; others have tumbled downward in the early
stages of their trajectories. Because they are not finding their way,
they may feel as if they are going nowhere and have nowhere to go...
Some anxious junior staffers may have chosen their particular roads
for all the wrong reasons. Some embarked upon a career odyssey without
fully understanding what that journey was destined to be about. No one
told them what dental school or dental practice truly entailed; or if
it was explained to them, perhaps they were not ready to hear it. Other
young adults find themselves bound to an occupation from which they'd
like to bail out, but they feel chained to their entry positions.
Perhaps the pay is good, or backtracking would be too hard and risky,
or nothing else looks any better. Finally, there are those unqualified
for the peculiar rigors and aches of their grown-up work. It may be
that their current abilities have failed to match their present
interests. You're in for some trouble if whatever you like to do most
you do poorly. Some people have strengths they're not interested in
exploiting and interests that bring out all their weaknesses.... In
other words, you're in trouble if you don't know your Self. And who's
teaching that in McWorld today? Or even encouraging it? Mommy? Daddy?
Mr. Chairman? Mr. Whipple?
By null. [∞Fouroboros]
6:12:15 PM
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2005
Judy Smith.
Last update:
5/2/2005; 3:10:11 PM.
|
|
|