Updated: 8/1/03; 3:14:41 PM.
Ed Foster's Radio Weblog
        

Friday, July 11, 2003

Good marketing or deceptive practices? You be the judge on this gripe I recently received from a reader:

I recently upgraded my anti-virus protection to McAfee 7.02 Professional. The package comes with a nifty little marketing nuisance called "McAfee Security Center." This obnoxious little ploy includes a "security assessment" of the following areas: "My Security Index" (mine is a mediocre 5.8 on a scale of 10.0), "My Antivirus Index" (mine is a perfect 10.0! Probably because I am running McAfee's product), "My Antihacker Index" (In my case an abysmal 1.0), "My Antiabuse Index" (Only scored 1.0 again), and "My Antispam Index" (1.0 a final time). Obviously there is an unknown weighting involved, since I can't make the math do a 5.8 from the component indices. Each index is, I believe, tied to McAfee's products: VirusScan, Personal Firewall, and Spamkiller respectively.
I failed the McAfee test in spite of a well configured security set: Sygate Personal Firewall Pro (McAfee's test probes didnt touch me by their own admission), AdAware 6.0, SyBot Search and Destroy, and Pest Patrol...all of which I employ regularly to their fullest. All this and I flunked? McAfee should be ashamed trying to scare folks into thinking they are vulnerable when it ain't necessarily so. For a company in the security business to tell me I am vulnerable because I am not running their stuff is reprehensible marketing at its worst.

10:37:19 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2003 Ed Foster.
 
July 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Jun   Aug


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Ed Foster's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.