|
 |
Sunday, August 22, 2004 |
This issue might not be on your radar screen, but perhaps you recall
that earlier this year Mercury Marine filed a formal anti-dumping
complaint against the Japanese outboard manufacturers with the U.S.
Dept. of Commerce (DOC) and the International Trade Administration
(ITA). The complaint alleged that Yamaha and other Japanese
maufacturers were "dumping" engines on the U.S. market at lower prices
than they were selling them for in Japan.
On August 6, The DOC issued a Preliminary Determination Notice that affirms Mercury's complaint. A final determination will not be made until December, after it considers "comments from interested parties on its preliminary
determination, as well as other record evidence."
In the wake of DOC's preliminary
determination, Irwin Jacobs, Chairman and CEO of Genmar Holdings, Inc.,
the largest manufacturer of recreational boats in the U.S., wrote a
five-page letter to 7,000 marine dealers and marine industry leaders
criticizing the DOC and asking others in the marine industry to comment
on the matter. Among other things, Jacobs said "Frankly, after
reading [the documents filed by Mercury outlining their anti-dumping
complaint] and listening to and taking part in the hearings, I was
shocked and in disbelief that the DOC and ITA didn't throw Mercury's
case out on the spot."
Jacobs says that in fact Genmar has paid more for Yamaha engines than
Mercury engines, and that the largest discount Genmar ever received was
from Mercury. He goes on to set the record straight about why
Genmar increased its business with Yamaha (product quality, customer
request and the bankruptcy of Outboard Marine Corporation) and suggests
that Mercury used the complaint as a way to increase business share
lost in part due to the poor performance of its Optimax engines.
He points out that Mercury has closed down several U.S. boat plants and
set up new plants in Mexico, and that it plans to build additional
plants in China.
"On its face aalong with the real facts," Jacobs says, "I believe
Mercury's anti-dumping complaint against Yamaha is the most ridiculous
and abusive statement of the facts I've ever encountered."
Jacobs concludes his letter this way: "We all know that over the years
our marine industry has been less than proactive in dealing with our
challenges and issues that negatively impact our industry before they
happen. I believe that in this case the industry needs to be
heard from for the sake of everyone involved in the marine industry,
including the boat-buying consumer. Finally, let's not forget
that Brunswick [which owns Mercury Marine] is a substantial company in
the boat business. If the U.S. Government allows them to
substantially raise engine prices through their anti-dumping complaint,
imagine what they someday will be able to do by combining their
outboard engine price advantage with their own boat companies against
the rest of the industry. The entire boating industry will
forever change and not in a positive way."
Jacobs has posted his testimony before the DOC/ITA hearing commission on a page on his company's website: www.genmar.com/iljTestimony.cfm.
It is certainly worth reading, if you are at all interested in the
politics of outboard motor sales and the things going on behind the
scenes in the marine industry. Or if you are now or ever will be
in the market for a new boat and outboard motor.
Later...
9:47:17 PM
|
|
© Copyright 2004 Dan Small.
|
|
|