Thursday, August 28, 2003

Cleveland Plain Dealer: Voting machine pres supports Bush and will deliver.. Posted here Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 6:17:31 PM      The facts are amazing.  The head of a company vying to sell voting machines in Ohio told Republicans in a recent fund-raising letter that he is "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." The Aug. 14 letter from Walden O'Dell, chief executive of Diebold Inc. - who has become active in the re-election effort of President Bush - prompted Democrats this week to question the propriety of allowing O'Dell's company to calculate votes in the 2004 presidential election. ********

On lobbying: Welcome to the Machine: How the GOP disciplined K Street and made Bush supreme. Posted here Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 3:34:09 PM     quoting  When presidents pick someone to fill a job in the government, it's typically a very public affair. The White House circulates press releases and background materials. Congress holds a hearing, where some members will pepper the nominee with questions and others will shower him or her with praise. If the person in question is controversial or up for an important position, they'll rate a profile or two in the papers. But there's one confirmation hearing you won't hear much about. It's convened every Tuesday morning by Rick Santorum, the junior senator from Pennsylvania, in the privacy of a Capitol Hill conference room, for a handpicked group of two dozen or so Republican lobbyists. Occasionally, one or two other senators or a representative from the White House will attend. Democrats are not invited, and neither is the press. The chief purpose of these gatherings is to discuss jobs--specifically, the top one or two positions at the biggest and most important industry trade associations and corporate offices centered around Washington's K Street, a canyon of nondescript office buildings a few blocks north of the White House that is to influence-peddling what Wall Street is to finance. In the past, those people were about as likely to be Democrats as Republicans, a practice that ensured K Street firms would have clout no matter which party was in power. But beginning with the Republican takeover of Congress in 1994, and accelerating in 2001, when George W. Bush became president, the GOP has made a determined effort to undermine the bipartisan complexion of K Street. And Santorum's Tuesday meetings are a crucial part of that effort. Every week, the lobbyists present pass around a list of the jobs available and discuss whom to support. Santorum's responsibility is to make sure each one is filled by a loyal Republican--a senator's chief of staff, for instance, or a top White House aide, or another lobbyist whose reliability has been demonstrated. After Santorum settles on a candidate, the lobbyists present make sure it is known whom the Republican leadership favors. "The underlying theme was [to] place Republicans in key positions on K Street. Everybody taking part was a Republican and understood that that was the purpose of what we were doing," says Rod Chandler, a retired congressman and lobbyist who has participated in the Santorum meetings. "It's been a very successful effort." comment:  the major item as a citizen is not a vote, but a career, and  politcal economy shows the power..   ********

US violates nuclear treaty. Interesting approach. Posted here Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 1:35:15 PM     The following hints at the problem of empire and international law. If the US violates, does it not set the conditions for other rogue states? Doesn't the cop have to act well? AFP via Hindustan Times: The head of the UN nuclear agency accused the United States of effectively breaking a ban on the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction through its research into so-called "mini-nukes". International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed El-Baradei in an interview to German magazine Stern said, "Double standards are being used here. The US government insists that other countries do not possess nuclear weapons." "On the other hand they are perfecting their own arsenal. I do not think that corresponds with the treaty they signed." ********

Irving Kristol, leading Neo-conservative, writes about what it is. Worth studying. Posted here Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 10:51:35 AM     Neoconservatism is the first variant of American conservatism in the past century that is in the "American grain." It is hopeful, not lugubrious; forward-looking, not nostalgic; and its general tone is cheerful, not grim or dyspeptic. Its 20th-century heroes tend to be TR, FDR, and Ronald Reagan. Such Republican and conservative worthies as Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Dwight Eisenhower, and Barry Goldwater are politely  overlooked. Of course, those worthies are in no way overlooked by a large, probably the largest, segment of the Republican party, with the result that most Republican politicians know nothing and could not care less about neoconservatism.   comment: I find that FDR is included rather amazing. TR was anti monopoloy and pro empire. Lets see how these play out.   In earlier times, democracy meant an inherently turbulent political regime, with the "have-nots" and the "haves" engaged in a perpetual and utterly destructive class struggle. It was only the prospect of economic growth in which everyone prospered, if not equally or simultaneously, that gave modern democracies their legitimacy and durability.   Yes. And this helps explain why democracy is the language of choice of the globalization folks, with the caveat that democracy is managed through representation and media.   Neocons would prefer not to have large budget deficits, but it is in the nature of democracy--because it seems to be in the nature of human nature--that political demagogy will frequently result in economic recklessness, so that one sometimes must shoulder budgetary deficits as the cost (temporary, one hopes) of pursuing economic growth. It is a basic assumption of neoconservatism that, as a consequence of the spread of affluence among all classes, a property-owning and tax-paying population will, in time, become less vulnerable to egalitarian illusions and demagogic appeals and more sensible about the fundamentals of economic   comment: The idea is that as the pyramid grows larger the base benefits. But changes in the economy shift us from a standard pyramid shape  to Washington Monument model of distribution. It is the negative effects of globalization that crate its enemies, and hence enemies of the Bush administration.   The rest of the article seems like  a collage that lacks deep logic and is meant to feel good. It provokes assent more than analysis. It is a collage of ideas that hide the deeper reality: managing the wealth of empire. Still important to read. Filled wih eally interesting contradictions. ********