|
|
Friday, October 10, 2003 |
|
Taking stock of Iraq summary from Christian Science Monitor Posted here Friday, October 10, 2003 at 12:50:59 PM This is the beginning of a summary of Iraq conditions. Since most people are looking for an edge, against Bush or for a story of drama, a blalanced view is hard to get at. the balanced view will, in the long run either support or undercut Bush. So far, thegallp Pollseems to say it is not so bad.there is a storm on the surface but the lack of State sanctioned terror in the depths means that dialy ife for most is actualy better. The surface might be a bunch of porly constructed US responses, but the deeper may indicate that Bush can get away with this one.
The larger picture, how Iraq fist with Iran, Afghanistan and pakistan is a harder story. If the US needs a graeful fliht path to a less powerful future, given the rise of the rest of the world, and we wn a world culture of anti-nuclar weapn use and moving towards democratization and economic fairness, we may have stepped off the path into bully stupiity.
******** |
|
PBS on Iraq Posted here Friday, October 10, 2003 at 10:03:23 AM Be sure to watch a PBS special on Iraq. For an overview read http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/truth/etc/synopsis.html and for some details http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/truth/interviews/ ******** |
|
Schwarzenegger announced a broadly bipartisan transition team Posted here Friday, October 10, 2003 at 9:54:00 AM This is a welcome surprize. Compaer it to the Bush strategy of non-inclusion..
******** |
|
Bush and Castro via Wired Posted here Friday, October 10, 2003 at 9:48:07 AM The US and Cuba. When it is all over and "democracy" wins in Cuba, there will be a flood of struggles over property and expat business deals. the country will revert to a rich-poor paradigm. It could have been a legitimate experiment from which we could all learn about an alternative view of how to do things. Cuba has been strong on social justice, in property, incomes, medicine and schools, but the pressure from being denied a role in the international economy has limited the value of the experiment. The cost has been increasing lack of political justice. We have two paradigms: a market/media managed society or a central committee paradigm. We can see the costs and benefits of each, which we need to do if we are to move beyond the economic marginalization created by the one and the political repression of the other.
******** |
|
Numbers:Businessweek on increase in unmarrieds. Posted here Friday, October 10, 2003 at 9:37:11 AM From Businessweek, to which we can add the rural/urban split, the distribution of age, and the distribution of incomes.Unmarried America. This hints at the increasing dominacne of people who are caught between market and jobs with no other relationships.
also let's add
******** |
|
Mini essay California results who voted for what? Posted here Friday, October 10, 2003 at 9:01:42 AM I applaud the statistical anlysis of voting and vote differences that might reveal problems and even manipulations of voting machines. But we must not lose sight of a very major factor in this election. Recall lost in almost all the coastal counties, and Bustamente won in all the bay area counties. It was a rural/ urban split, and our failure to understand this means we do not lead ourselves to a deeper undersanding of what the rural vote has on its mind. My own udersanding is that it does not ike th whole package of urban, large system, ewlfare, tax, corporate, federal power world. What is striking to me is that both the left leaning and right leaning folks agree on the dangers of bigness. The left sees big in terms of military industrial complex, and the right in terms of sate welfare and compulsory education. Both have a common enemy, but project the desire for largeness onto the other. We need to think more deeply about the way in which the urban technical market ysstem is explitative of much of the rural part of the country. Sources for data, the New York Times, an excellent interactive map. ******** |
|
Red Cross criticizes Guantanamo Posted here Friday, October 10, 2003 at 8:48:43 AM The way in which the US has dealt with detainees, prisoners, suspects, lacks fundamental concern for human dignity. Instead of representing the best of American justice, it has shown an instinct for revenge and sacrificing the individual to the public task of warnings, using the person for state needs. This is what the constitution was meant to prevent. It has taken an aspect of the post 911 situation, where American culture of restraint and human rights could have been showcased, instead we have a wasting of a an opportunity and a tradition.and put the US at greaterrisk in the world. Stumulating the old culture of an eye for an eye and retribution, rather than due process and justice though the judgment of peers, is a major step backwards. I find it humiliating, and I am shocked there has not been more criticism and a movement to prevent this.It may be something we need to take on.
******** |