Wednesday, December 03, 2003

Middle East Peace: Europe Strategizes To Counter U.S. Hegemony
Posted here Wednesday, December 03, 2003 at 3:53:21 PM    

see Stratfor

Summary

Europe is backing an unofficial Middle East peace proposal in a bid to strengthen its hand in the region and curb U.S. influence.

The maneuvering will not lead to a clash between Brussels and Washington, but it will improve the geopolitical position of some actors in the region who are out of favor with the United States.


********
Erich Fromm on reason
Posted here Wednesday, December 03, 2003 at 3:49:57 PM    

Erich Fromm in Beyond the Cains of Illusion.

I believe that the only force that can save us from self destruction is reason; the capacity to recognize the unreality of most of the ideas that man holds, and to penetrate to the reality veiled by the layers and layers of deception and ideologies; reason, not as a body of knowledge, but as a "kind of energy, a force which is fully comprehensible only in its agency and effects a force whose "most important function consists in its power to bind and to dissolve." (fn 1) Violence and arms will not save us; sanity and reason may. .... (footnote 1 from Ernst Cassirer, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment (Boston: Beacon Press, 1955), p. 13.)


********
Unger on modern spiritual movements. in his Boutwood lectures
Posted here Wednesday, December 03, 2003 at 3:46:01 PM    

From Unger

A spiritual movement has accompanied the hollowing out of social democracy. This movement is the privatization of the sublime: the containment of energy and hope within the most intimate recesses of private experience and the abandonment of public life as a proper sphere for the advancement of large projects. In this circumstance, both high and popular culture have come to be dominated by fantasies of adventure, escape and empowerment. Such experiences invoke the very experiences denied in me numdrum worms of politics and work. They express lament over a sense of entrapment: awareness that the diminished life one lives is the only life one is ever going to live. .


********
Rereading Unger
Posted here Wednesday, December 03, 2003 at 10:30:11 AM    

Some rough notes I scanned rereading Umberto Unger

Reading Unger.

 

Review of Democracy Realized by Anne Kornhauser on Roberto Unger is up for grabs: the future of the welfare state; the shape of post-Cold War military policy; the structure of the global economy; and the organization of emerging democracies. [remember the issue of republics]existing institutional and political arrangements could be thoroughly revolutionized and in the process made considerably more democratic

 

-bu actual revolution. …. A post-welfare-state democratic politics. …. Jnger does not, however, reject the basic goals of the welfare state: greater equality and personal autonomy. Rather, he significantly complicates the picture as t …. There is no reason, for example, that we cannot simultaneously increase government activism and free enterprise….: a virtual manifesto for "deepening democracy," which for him means breaking down existing hierarchies and social roles, reducing economic inequality, enhancing people's imaginative and critical capacities, and increasing popular political participation.

 

He rejects the revolutionary and deterministic vision of Marxism and liberalism's reliance on a neutral state and neutral institutions. Politics always has a purpose and therefore must promote a particular way of life …. Politics must also be relentlessly pluralist. "No one should have to live in a society in which public policy and institutional arrangements express the outlook of a particular part of the people against other parts." …. ….

 

It too often reads as if the practical suggestions are grafted onto his theory. 

 

"progressives" must look beyond "the established institutional framework ….The corollary of this is that significant institutional change can be practical and achievable, rather than simply wide-eyed utopianism. …. The very process of institutional experimentation is crucial to democracy as it empowers individuals by providing an important source of knowledge about the possibilities for arranging political and social life to decentralize existing institutions and create new ones at the local level. But at adding huge structures to the central government, such as a new, quasijudicial branch of government that would enforce social and economic rights, including at the local level and in civil society—without fully grappling with the problems that centralized mechanisms may pose for his populist vision. (Another example of centralization in his program is his proposal for the automatic unionization of all workers. What sort of structure, if any, would coordinate this sort of labor organization?) …. Rather than jettisoning redistnbutionist policies altogether, Linger wishes to supplement them with structural changes in the economy. These include the virtual banning of private inheritance in favor of social inheritance mechanisms into which the rich pay; the

 

Much of Unger's attention is directed toward increasing access to what he calls the "vanguard," or advanced sectors of the economy, which are to be found, in varying degrees, in both older industrial democracies and emerging democracies. These sectors are characterized by greater degrees of capital investment; a higher premium on knowledge or skill; unionization; and full-time work, often with the opportunity for advancement. Unger contrasts the "vanguard" with the "rearguard," those economic sectors characterized by low- or unskilled work, part-time jobs, little or no unionization, id a lack of protection and investment by the by the government and private sector alike

 

But they are only farfetched, Unger would be quick to tell us, if we're looking through the lenses of extant institutions and of assumptions about what is politically possible.


********
Bush in Asia.
Posted here Wednesday, December 03, 2003 at 9:42:05 AM    

This from the Washington Post

In Thailand at the meeting for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, "there was no question that Hu was the better appreciated one," a Thai official said to me. "He outshone Bush in most of the attendees' eyes." The trips ended with the two making back-to-back visits to Australia. Bush was greeted with demonstrations, his address to Parliament interrupted by hecklers. Hu, on the other hand, got a 20-minute standing ovation from Parliament. "It is Hu's visit rather than George W. Bush's that will provide a lingering sense of satisfaction and security about Australia's place in the region," wrote the Australian, a newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch and not given to knee-jerk anti-Americanism.

What is going on here? How does the chief representative of the world's oldest constitutional democracy lose a popularity contest to the leader of a Leninist party?

A society in the 21st C.  needs a leader that can be admired. Not necessarily charismatic, but above alreasonable, humane, ethical, a good listener as well as an articulate spokesperson.

And even stronger, this must read, on China while the US is absent.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/international/asia/03LETT.html?hp


********