|
|
Saturday, June 05, 2004 |
|
Posted here Saturday, June 05, 2004 at 1:44:56 PM Anthropology - a complete rethinking of the amazon..
******** |
|
Posted here Saturday, June 05, 2004 at 11:21:41 AM at http://www.counterpunch.org/ for today
******** |
|
Posted here Saturday, June 05, 2004 at 10:50:53 AM The technocratic runs on a myth of bits, bytes and bricks: that the world is an ensemble of things, and so are you and I.
referenced in http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~consbio/Cons/Historical2003.pdf ******** |
|
Posted here Saturday, June 05, 2004 at 9:58:30 AM I need to be thinking about political platforms, hence the poem just posted. What has me thinking is, the list of issues emerging here and there feels off to me, so I need to get clear why. The economist for example has a list of issues that have come out of the Copenhagen process (see article for background). http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=2724755 That list is
My sense is that this list serves the technocratic state. It has little about culture, democracy, media, style. Nothing on arms trade (civil conflict might reach it) nor justice (fairness). Another list comes from a poll you can take on line http://www.presidentmatch.com/Guide.jsp2 and the list of issues that defines your politics is
These seem to me to be the issues that divide us, not the issues that could unite us. And they seem to cut the wrong way, certainly across my own politics. I am for education in any form , more of it everywhere. I am for rethinking corporate charters. I am against term limits. I am for arms trade reduction. I am for rethinking the "criminal" justice system. I am for rethinking the gerrymandering of the poor re mortgage rates and food availability, services such as garbage and police.
If we did these, many of the other issues would be "solved". So what is the tendency of thinking that leads the political into the current way of dicing the cake? ******** |