|
|
Monday, May 10, 2004 |
|
Posted here Monday, May 10, 2004 at 10:45:33 PM The shift in perspectives is quite dramatic. David Brooks writes a column in tomorrow's NYT that looks good because of his sift in viewpoint but tellingly naive. One part says
He says nothing about what this does to the war on terrorism (hopefully redefined to a more precise effort against a few with multilateral agreements). But earlier in the article he says
Having traveled quite a bit, taken a number of anthropology courses and read a good deal of history, I find the naiveté in Brooks' prose amazingly uninformed, and hinting that his colleagues were as naive..., well, that anyone could have believed this, just appalls me. From the start the bombing was not going to create friends, and the looting showed that the mission was unplanned, as was the threat to the supply lines very early. This is not just an intellectual failure, but a failure of imagination across cultural and class lines. ******** |
|
Posted here Monday, May 10, 2004 at 4:55:31 PM The following is slightly rough younger generation european talk, but important as part of the Iraq discourse, both for what it says about the culture of that group, but also for insights into the underlying larger factors at work.
******** |
|
Posted here Monday, May 10, 2004 at 2:44:20 PM This picture is our enemies? That was not smart. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/10/international/middleeast/10CND-IRAQ.html Iraqis Rebuild Cleric's Office ******** |
