Wednesday, September 10, 2003

Is there one path to the future?
Posted here Wednesday, September 10, 2003 at 7:09:26 PM    

 overheard...

I see a very disturbing rhetorical trend afoot.  The assumption of a "single sustainable model of development" (that's at least very close to a quote from the current National Security Strategy) is being used to argue that, absent evil influences, every nation on earth not only *can*, but *will* develop along lines preferred by the United States.  And that, in turn, means that anyone who even predicts the victory, say, of a communist revolution, is, shall we say, standing in the way of history, and is either foolish or criminal.

[comment: From Fukuyama, Friedman and Ralph Peters, that trend certainly exists. ]


********
The US and the Flying Tigers
Posted here Wednesday, September 10, 2003 at 6:58:20 PM    

 overheard...

The Flying Tigers were a tool set up by Washington to attack Japan. In July 1941 Washington decided to use China as a proxy to attack Japan in a significant way. This was not a theoretical paper plan. Tens of millions of dollars were spent, the planes were purchased, the pilots and ground crews were signed up by a dummy corporation controlled by FDR's aides and sent overseas. and trained by Chennault.

 

comment: thre is a long history of the US doing such. Chile another example. most are well known. the US could do beter and gain a ne kind of reputation. How to avoid however the label of "weakness?"

 

Roosevelt's "Nothing to fear but fear itself." is badly mangled by the Bush/Cheney style.


********
Iraq: From Japapn, use asks tribute
Posted here Wednesday, September 10, 2003 at 6:32:21 PM    

Views from overseas often try to reflect the best of American values, against current realities.

 

Contributions for Iraq seem like tributes

Often, when we actually see a person we usually see only on television, that person strikes us as unexpectedly small. The White House struck me the same way when I saw it in the U.S. capital for the first time.

Of course, it was a stately and elegant edifice. But I thought it was small for the symbol of a superpower. In fact, I heard some Americans say in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that one of the reasons the terrorists did not target the White House was that its small size made it difficult to aim a hijacked airliner at.

The small White House has sent out massive ``bills.'' While asking Congress to appropriate an equivalent of about 10 trillion yen to finance operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, U.S. President George W. Bush on Sunday urged Japan, Europe and states in the Middle East to make financial contributions as countries that ``will benefit from the success of freedom'' in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The United States resorted to military action in Iraq despite misgivings expressed by a considerable number of countries. Getting bogged down with the Iraqi occupation, Washington seeks massive financial contributions from other nations, even letting it be known that it will collect the sums it has asked for.

Criticisms are prominent in the American and European media that the war in Iraq was based on overly optimistic prospects and that Bush has switched the focus from weapons of mass destruction to the war on terror.

The mess in Iraq has fundamentally resulted from the Bush administration's pursuit of unilateralism.

In his farewell address, George Washington, the first American president, said, ``Observe good faith and justice towards all Nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. ... Nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular Nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded.'' (A Japanese translation of the text of Washington's address is available in the form of a collection of American presidential speeches, published by Hara Shobo.)

About 200 years have passed since then. The times and relations between the United States and the rest of the world have drastically changed. But Washington's farewell address holds out eternal lessons to be learned by all leaders.


********
Bush limitations
Posted here Wednesday, September 10, 2003 at 3:15:30 PM    

If Bush is both stupid and very poorly educated, by school, friends, travel or even popular culture, then the US lacks an ability to evolve. We are stuck with stupid, stubborn, faking it  and bully bravado. A political crisis is likely to emerge long before the election.

My guess is he does not remember Bre'r Rabbit and Tarbaby - hit and you get stuck.. The following is typical of the emerging disquiet in the press.

Analysis: Insiders slam Bush's speech

Knight Ridder Newspapers

Even some officials in the president's administration worry that in his address to the nation Sunday night he glossed over his shifting rationales for war in Iraq, oversimplified the sources of anti-American rage there and overstated the benefits of victory, both to the war on terrorism and to American policy in the Middle East.


********