 |
Monday, April 25, 2005 |
Turns out they are surprisingly similar. <grin> This research comparing apples and oranges is going to be a versatile tool in my rhetorical toolbox. I especially like the following meta/recursive/reflective observation:
First, the statement that something is like comparing apples and oranges is a kind of analogy itself. That is, denigrating an analogy by accusing it of comparing apples and oranges is, in and of itself, comparing apples and oranges.
3:51:36 AM
|
|
© Copyright 2006 Nicholas Gall.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| April 2005 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
| 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| 10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
| 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
| 24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
| Mar May |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|