| September 2003 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
| Aug Oct | ||||||
I'm reading about how anamorphosis, considered deviant art in the middle ages has become the dominant aesthetic in the 'post-human' or virtual world. I don't fully understand this as anamorphosis seems to be nothing more than parlour tricks on canvas. I guess the web makes everything flat, and to exist in that world is some kind of parlour trick. My problem is I don't understand this virtual world idea beyond the example of the world wide web.
I'm talking about "Data Trash" by Arthur Kroker, which is what I"m reading.
This link, http://www.anamorphosis.com/, has good information on anamorphosis including an app that let's you obliquely anamorphosis your own photos (I haven't tried that yet. Maybe I'll bring a copy to class. At least if I don't understand what I'm reading I'll get brownie points.
Kroker also uses the term "Trompe l'oiel" a nauseating amount. According to this site, a trompe l'oeil only tricks when viewed from it's intended view point. It's almost the opposite of anamorphosis. Anamorphosis can only be seen correctly from an unexpected viewpoint.
8:11:35 PM