
|
 |
 |
|
| |
Infospigot: The Chronicles, May 6-11
 | Thursday, May 06, 2004 |
Some military heroes
Good New York Times story onsome
of the military officers defending terror-war detainees inupcoming
military tribunals. It takes a lot of courage, and belief inwhat are
often termed basic American values, to fight the system:
Last
month, an audience at Oxford University in Englandwas stunned,witnesses
said, when two of the lawyers, Lt. Cmdr. CharlesSwift ofthe Navy and
Maj. Mark Bridges of the Army, said the tribunals were notcapable of
producing a fair and just result. The
several hundred people who hadgathered for a talk about the Guantánamo
detention facility did notexpect to hear the American officers'
objections.
Murray Wesson, a Rhodes Scholar from South Africa who attended, wrote on his Web log:
"What I was unprepared for, given that thesewere, after all, military
lawyers, was how critical of the process theywere. Indeed, they went so
far as to describe the tribunals as`fundamentally flawed' and
insinuated that they would not amount to fairtrials."
2:05:34 PM | |
I was going to say ....... something funny earlier this morning. But then I, and just about everyone else atTechTV, got laid off. It's not a shock -- the station wassold several weeks ago and it was clear from the grapevinethat the new owners (Comcast)wasn't
toointerested in continuing our programming. Anyway, it's actually
arelief to know what's happening and that our office will be shut
down.The down side -- maybe it'sthis way every time a shutdown or
layoff happens, though weupper-middle-class types might not think about
it when the closureinvolves a can factory or poultry processors -- is
the hurt among allthe people here who really have given their best to
do something goodThe up side is that under the WARNAct,the federal law governing plant closures, we got 60 days' notice plus aseverance package. It could be a lot worse. More later.
1:14:13 PM | |
 | Friday, May 07, 2004 |
The layoffWired News: "TechTV to Lay Off 285" News.com: "TechTV Lays Off San Francisco Staff"
And
there were other stories, too. Just to comment on one little detailin
both of these: You'd think that Comcast gave us 60 days' notice outof
the goodness of its soft ol' cable heart. Witness the quote from theG4
spokesguy (who is named David Shane in one of the linked piecesabove
and David Shone in the other):
"Today
we gave notice to 285 employees that they'll be impacted by themerger.
We wanted to give employees as much notice aspossible so that they can
begin to make other plans." Uh
huh. As I noted yesterday, though, Comcast and G4 had no choice inthe
matter. The 60-day notice is required by federal law becauseshutting
down a workplace of our size is considered a plant closing(the company
needs to do other things under the law, too, likenotifying the mayor of
San Francisco that it's putting a bunch ofpeople on the street). So I
can now consider myself the beneficiary ofone of the few labor-friendly
laws to get through Congress in recentmemory.
The staff gets to
meet with G4's CEO, Charles Hirschhorn, on Monday and hear whatelse is
in store for us (for instance, will we continue producing ourdaily show
all the way through July, when the 60 days is up?).
10:18:14 PM | |
More on torturegate (the word)The
number of Google references was at 13 on Thursday and is 31 thisevening
(mostly on blogs, and counting my two earlier posts). Nexisshows two
mentions: One during "Hannity and Colmes" on Fox News onThursday and
one in a short news item in a paper somewhere. Google Newsshows one
reference, Yahoo! News shows zero, and Google's search ofUsenet groups
shows three (all Thursday). "Torturegate" doesn't appearat all on two
select indexes of blog content, Daypop and Blogdex.
OK,
so that's today's unscientific take on one new word. However,
somepeople are trying to be a little more scientific about how new
wordsand ideas spread in cyberspace. Wired News has a story today
called "How the Word Gets Around," on an experiment to follow the spread of a new memeonline.
After reading the article, I'm not sure what the projectproves, because
it started out as and invited people to participate asa sort of
self-conscious exercise. It'd be more interesting to trace anidea that
just sort of gets thrown into the collective consciousness.Like
"torturegate."
9:55:17 PM | |
 | Saturday, May 08, 2004 |
Nice dog! By way of a post on Salon, we have this wonderful juxtaposition of images as well as this heartwarming story from the heartland: "Dog from Iraq Finds New Home in Area Town." From the Clinton (Iowa) Herald:
"A
thin, hungry stray in Iraq, the dog's chances for a long, happy life
were slim. Dogs are not welcome house pets in that country, but rather
are forced to live off roots, bugs or whatever they can find to
survive. Some of the animals, like Sheeba, even eat rocks that make
them feel full." 11:03:56 AM | |
 | Sunday, May 09, 2004 |
George, Rummy -- listen up
From Justice Louis Brandeis's dissent in Olmstead vs. United States:
...
Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government
officialsshall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are
commands tothe citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the
government willbe imperiled if it fails to observe the law
scrupulously. Ourgovernment is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For
good or for ill,it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is
contagious. If thegovernment becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt
for law; it invitesevery man to become a law unto himself; it invites
anarchy. ..." 11:57:45 PM | |
 | Monday, May 10, 2004 |
Not a lie, not the truthOne
of the tactics the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld Damage Control Team(BCRDCT) is
using to try to contain Torturegate is to show the worldhow utterly
forthcoming they are -- have always been -- about the issueof prisoner
abuse at the Abu Ghraib facility. Rumsfeld testified,backed up by an official Pentagon timeline,that
in January "the Central Command public affairs people went out andtold
theworld. They toldeveryone in the world that there were allegations of
abuse and theywere being investigated." That statement set everyone
running to Weband news archives to find the January release. Saturday,
the LosAngeles Times reprinted the information put out on January 16:
"An
investigation has been initiated into reported incidents ofdetainee
abuse at a Coalition Forces detention facility. The release ofspecific
information concerning the incidents could hinder theinvestigation,
which is in its early stages. The investigation will beconducted in a
thorough and professional manner. The Coalition iscommitted to treating
all persons under its control with dignity,respect and humanity. Lt.
Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the CommandingGeneral, has reiterated this
requirement to all members of CJTF-7." The Times's story notes that the release--
what you might call understated, given the fact someone had
justpresented officers with a pile of hot photographs -- was one of
threereleased that day (the other two focused on U.S. military
activities).BCRDCT did some Nexis homework before Rumsfeld hit the Hill
on Friday,because one of the points mentioned to show how the
authorities havedone their best to bring this whole situation to light
was that themedia picked up on the story in January. And in fact, a
Nexis searchshows that the bare facts of the press release did make it
into dozensof news outlets the day after the release, almost always as
one item inan extended digest of other developments. The Associated
Press, NewYork Times and others talked to the Pentagon about the
release, andcame away with statements saying that the abuse allegations
were"serious" and "credible." The story got wide, but not deep, play
inCanada. Two days after the release, London's Sunday Times ran a
longerstory on detainee abuse, highlighting the case of a man who had
falleninto the hands of U.S. forces, imprisoned, and beaten.
But
for the most part -- with notable exceptions, such as a March 3Salon
story with detailed of abuses at Abu Ghraib -- the stoppedfor most of
the media. Bottom line for now: the damage-control folksdownplayed the
events in January and got away with it; it's hard toavoid the
conclusion that most of the media never looked hard enough atwhat was
there.
1:00:13 AM | |
 | Tuesday, May 11, 2004 |
 They had it comingSen. James Inhofe,Republican
of Oklahoma, has had enough of the crying and moaning overtorture of
Iraqi prisoners. It's real simple, he says: The guys whowere mistreated
had it coming. As quoted by CNN and Reuters:
"I'm
probably not the only one up at this table that is moreoutraged by the
outrage than we are by the treatment. I am also outraged that we have
so many humanitarian do-gooders rightnow crawling all over these
prisons looking for human rightsviolations, while our troops, our
heroes are fighting and dying," hesaid. "These prisoners, you know they're not there for trafficviolations," said Inhofe. "Ifthey're
in cell block 1A or 1B, these prisoners -- they're murderers,they're
terrorists, they're insurgents. .... Many of them probably have
American blood on theirhands. And here we're so concerned about the
treatment of thoseindividuals." 6:12:03 PM | |
Torturegate, the word countGoogle: 102 Technorati: 15 Yahoo! News: 6 Google News: 6 Nexis: 2 Daypop: 1 Blogdex: 0
10:49:41 AM | |
Torturegate ... is on the air!
I
just got .15 seconds (yes, 15/100ths of a second, or about 12
gnatheartbeats) of fame deriving from my historic role as the father
oftorturegate (the word). This sliverette of recognition arrived in
myOutlook Express inbox from The O'Franken Factor at 8:45 a.m. PDT:
Dan, I’d
like to talk to you ASAP to ask a question about the word
“torturegate”—my number is [deleted], or you could email me your
number. Much appreciated! Ben Wikler Producer The O’Franken Factor Yeah,
I got all hot and bothered about it. I called as soon as Isaw the note,
having visions of snappy on-air repartee with Al Frankenand perhaps the
spontaneous creation of a new career in radio. But thereality fell
somewhat short of that. As Mr. Wikler told me, Mr. Frankenwas talking
about torturegate (the word) this morning on the show, andspecifically
the claim from Fox's Sean Hannity that the word wasinvented by
Democrats who are part of a vast left-wing conspiracy topoliticize the
abuse allegations and get rid of Rumsfeld. So, off the air, he askedme
-- probably the world authority on torturegate (the word) -- whetherI
was a Democrat? whether I had called for Rumsfeld's resignation?whether
I was part of the vast left-wing conspiracy to politicize theabuse case
(answers: yes; no; no, I think).
I would love to have talked to Franken, though. 10:17:53 AM | |
© Copyright 2004 Dan Brekke.
Last update: 6/30/04; 11:36:14 PM.
|
|
|