Adventures in home working

Here is a table with the different categories that I am currently blogging about and a short description of the content.  I have recently added a few, so some won’t be complete until I re-categorise my old posts which will take a few days.  I am also intended to post major work as articles, so that you can easily find the most important stuff, without having to search through archives.  You will be able to find these articles here.

There are a few topics that I would like to post on but am concerned about giving away too much intellectual capital, (my employers), these are Systems Architecture ,Enterprise Infrastructure Architecture and Managing Enterprise Infrastructure Projects, but I thought you might like to know about my interest and why my coverage on these is even more superficial than in the other areas where its easier to not give away the real valuable stuff.

- Posted by Steve Richards - 8:39:56 PM - comment []

As the months have progressed I have broadened the areas that I am prepared to blog publicly about.  That’s partly because I have got the habit and now find it fairly easy to find the time and energy to do it.  It’s also to do with the fact that my information processing pipeline and working environment are now very slick.  For this reason I am re-categorising my posts and also because even I find the volume of posts just to great to navigate easily. 

The final point is the most interesting, my blog is not just a list of time stamped jottings and links, its building into a bit of a strategic repository, (for me at least), I find it incredibly useful to look back at old blog posts to find links to information I need, and to find it in context and with my own comments that remind me of issues that may be important.  I also love the fact that the whole lot is one great inter-connected set of links. This is so difficult to create in my work life which is dominated by freestanding documents, (that tend to have masses of repetition or loads of references that no one every reads because they can never find them).

So I have created a whole load of extra categories which should help you hone into you topic of interest, and to read my thoughts on that topic as a coherent stream.  I have yet to re-categorise all of my posts yet which means:

1.     As I do re-categorise you will see repeat postings in your RSS feeds, :-(, although for many of you it maybe the first time you have seen them if you are recent subscribers :-)

2.     If you look at the categories during the next couple of days they will be pretty empty

- Posted by Steve Richards - 7:58:27 PM - comment []

A new version of open office is available.  The main improvements are:

Enhancements to the open-source productivity suite include support for PDF and XHTML exports and improved compatibility with Microsoft Office, according to the OpenOffice Web site. The new release, for example, will support forms conversion within Word documents and import text document layouts with more fidelity. OpenOffice 1.1 also boasts enhanced support for mobile device formats such as Palm's AportisDoc, Pocket Word and Pocket Excel.

IBM has ideas of its own, taking a thinner approach with its WorkPlace products

A wild card in the Office wars is IBM, which plans to offer server-based word processing, spreadsheet and presentation functionality to buyers of its WebSphere portal. At the very least, that could allow large customers to negotiate better Microsoft Office pricing/licensing, observers said. (See IBM Plans Sneak Attack On Microsoft Office.)

The MS Office team are majoring on quality for their next release, does this imply major changes, requiring major testing, or just good practice?

Software development, especially for a product as feature-rich as Office, is a repetitive process comprising what can seem to be endless feedback loops and rework.

"We're trying to reduce the iteration of that cycle because it's extremely costly," said Steven Sinofsky, senior vice president of Microsoft's Information Worker Product Group. "We want to use our development resources more effectively, yielding higher-quality code and not iterating what customers never see," he said.

The Office 12 team will rely on new tools, including Buddy Web, a system developers can use to privately share releases, according to the memo, from Eric Fox, Office development manager at Microsoft. Buddy Web had previously been used by the Outlook team.

In addition, the Office group will have access to Big Button, a system that gives developers easy access to the appropriate set of tests for their code.

Office 12, will not reply on Longhorn, not really a suprise, but its in print.

Microsoft knows it would be folly to leave the hundreds of millions of Windows XP and 2000 users out in the cold and force an upgrade to the shiny, new and radically different next version of Windows, code-named Longhorn, which is now expected to come out in 2007 or later. Office 12 initially was slated to ship with Longhorn, but the next-generation Windows platform slipped and Office didn't, according to one insider. "The Office team is disciplined. They nail down their feature set, set a schedule and usually hit it," the insider said.

Read all this in the context of my previous posts on Choosing an office suite

- Posted by Steve Richards - 7:46:40 PM - comment []

Atlantic published an article about the tools and techniques promoted by David Allen the author of the book Getting things done, which I read a few months back.  I liked the book and gave it a quick review here.  However for a better introduction its a good idea to read the article.  I have repeated a small snipit of it here to get you started.

The doctrine that inspires this devotion starts with the idea that the difference between done and undone tasks is more stress-inducing than most people recognize. In earlier times, Allen says, work was more physically exhausting than it is today. But it produced less anxiety; because people could easily tell what they had to do and whether it had been completed. Either the wood was chopped or it was not. The typical modern day, he says, is a fog of constantly accumulating open-ended obligations, with little barrier between the personal and the professional and few dear signals that you are actually "done." E-mail pours in. Hallway conversations end with 'I'll get back to you." The cell phone rings. The newspaper tells you about movies you'd like to see, recipes you'd like to try, places you'd like to go. There are countless things that everyone really "should" do more of--exercise, read, spend time with the family, have lunch with a contact, be "better" at work. The modern condition is to be overwhelmed--and, according to Allen, to feel not just tired but chronically anxious, because so many things you have at some level committed to do never get done.

The anxiety is compounded, he says, by a foible of the human mind: it can't remember, and it can't forget. No one can possibly remember all the promises, deadlines, and other "shoulds" of personal and occupational life. The proof is the need for datebooks. No sane person tries to keep all future meetings in his or her head. But, perversely, the brain also can't forget; at some deep and not very efficient level it is always stewing about the things you should have done but haven't, and it tends to remind you of them at the worst time--typically, 3:00 A.M. A vague but powerful awareness of all these uncompleted promises, or "open loops," is what Allen sees as the basic source of work-related stress, Again, datebooks illustrate the point. People complain about their schedules, but they rarely wake up at night worrying that they won't remember to go to the airport on the right day. That is because they trust their datebooks and trust themselves to look at their datebooks regularly.

If you are serious about personal productivity though then you could do worse than invest some time reviewing the discussion forum that David Allen's company hosts.  There is a very active debate in this forum and its quality stuff.

- Posted by Steve Richards - 6:51:23 PM - comment []