Updated: 8/20/2005; 2:54:36 PM.
Bill Schubart's Vermont Issues Weblog
A compendium of opinion pieces on Vermont and occasionally national issues Issues
        

Sunday, July 10, 2005

Can the Center Hold?

 

There is a deep tradition in Vermont of comity, people of diverse opinions coming together in civil debate, listening to one another, suffering compromise and getting things done that are in the best interests of community. This happens in cabinet-level meetings in the Executive branch, in the Vermont Supreme Court, the two legislative branches, in annual town meetings, select board meetings, local taverns and diners, and at home in kitchens.

 

I was reminded of this recently in a community gathering in which an array of top political officials from diverse political camps rose to speak and expressed clear and genuine respect for one another. The extent of any hortatory efforts to lay claim to a political position were gently teasing in nature and always respectful. We must not lose this sense of comity. The strident “my way or the highway” tenor of Washington political debate threatens us deeply as a nation.

 

An ideological camp is an easy, if not cozy, resort. It has clear tenets and facile sound bites (“Take Back Vermont” “No More War”) and is enriched and entrenched in an environment of fear, insecurity and malaise, becoming a repository for all that is wrong --recliner politics if you will. There is no need to rise to an occasion, understand a complex problem, discuss a solution or meet someone with whom you might disagree.

 

The place between ideologies is the uncomfortable place to be. It is a place that calls on us to listen, think, question and remain open to any articulate idea. It requires work of us, work policy makers in Vermont have historically been willing to come together and do.

 

There is a wonderful construct of dialogue called "Second Order Agreement” in which the adherent of one idea is called upon to defend the idea he or she opposes in the presence of a third and neutral party—each to the other’s satisfaction. It requires opponents at least to have thought enough about the idea they oppose to be able to articulate it and propose the opponent’s defense of it, a beginning of mutual understanding, if not agreement. Many of our schools have maintained a tradition of debate, essay writing and even documentary production all of which foster skills that support a center.

 

As neoconservative theorists pull political strings and demand a zealous allegiance to their ideology, punishing those who question or, God forbid, defect from their ranks, and as Democrats scramble to redefine themselves, the center in Washington is not holding. Ideologues in both camps gird up for battle, not dialogue. It is a crusade, more about money, allegiance, testosterone and religion than grappling with complex problems like national security, healthcare and economic justice. We need simply to adhere to the founding principles that self-proclaimed patriots claim to revere, the free expression of ideas without fear of retribution, a free and articulate press and electronic media that can differentiate between entertainment, journalism, opinion and the ideological compromises to each they seem willing to make to achieve their deregulatory ends.

 

Shortly after one of the most senseless wars in our history, Yeats wrote:

 

            Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold;

Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

            The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

The best lack all conviction, while the worst

Are full of passionate intensity.

 

A wise, open and vibrant society pays attention to its poets and artists.

 

America has flourished respecting these principles of free expression, open debate and comity. How can we sell democracy abroad if we cannot practice it effectively at home? We owe it to those we serve in a democracy to preserve and protect this tradition, none of which can exist in a climate of fear and intimidation created by political and religious ideologues seeking to transfuse democratic principles with their “passionate intensity.”

 

In Vermont, for the most part, our political leaders of all camps have worked hard to ensure that the center holds. Let’s keep it up.

 

Bill Schubart

 


11:15:23 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2005 Bill Schubart.
 
July 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Jun   Aug


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Bill Schubart's Vermont Issues Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.