|
|
Thursday, September 16, 2004
|
|
| |
Here is a test posting including an image of me
 Or try this
one with a variation on the src address

Images courtesy of my darling daughter Emily.
Maybe a little vain, but at least now I know how to post an image.
Yeahh!!!!
4:17:38 PM
|
|
I found this on the ROCKY
MOUNTAIN CLIMATE Organization news page. Here is the text of their blurb
AP,
August 4, 2004 - California
Proposes Solar Home Incentives. "California officials
are proposing that half of all new homes in the state should be running
on solar energy in 10 years, spurred by $100 million in annual
incentives paid for by electricity consumers....The combined solar
installations would be the equivalent of 36 new, $30 million, 75
megawatt natural gas "peaker" plants used when electricity is
most in demand, and would avoid pumping 50 million tons of carbon
dioxide into the air from the accompanying combustion, the California
EPA estimated."
I wonder what the 'equivalent
of 36 new, $30 million, 75 megawatt natural gas "peaker" plants'
really means. Mathematically, 36 plants x $30 million per plant
is approximately equal to 10 years times $100 million per
year. So it is equivalent in cost. Is it also
equivalent in energy production?
3:17:39 PM
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2006
Joe Biegelsen.
Last update:
4/12/2006; 6:23:49 PM.
|
|
| September 2004 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| 5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
| 12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
| 19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| 26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
| Jul Oct |
|