Updated: 7/1/2004; 5:17:57 PM.
On media and politics. . .
A political and news junkie responds to journalistic opinion, political action or inaction and conversations with other interested persons. BLogged by Melvyn Polatchek My text in black, quotes in Brown, URLs in blue - Usually published on Friday but occasionally during the week as well.
        

Thursday, June 24, 2004

War on terror - Who is the enemy?
We commonly refer to the war against terror as if it we were threatened by some amorphous blob. However, in this context, the word terror connotes a behavior, a tactic used by an enemy to achieve its goals. We are not at war with behavior no matter how reprehensible. We are at war with people, organizations and perhaps nations. Who are these people? By what standards do we decide they are our enemies, constituting a clear and present danger and requiring a military response?

After 9/11, Al Qaeda was identified as our prime enemy in the new century. The attack transformed them from a dangerous outlaw group, to be dealt with essentially as criminals, to a threat as dangerous as any we have faced. We know that Bin Laden set himself against the regime in Saudi Arabia because he considers it ‘oppressive, corrupt and tyrannical’. His reasons for singling out America as an enemy include the support of the Saudi regime and the presence of American troops in that country as well s the support for Israel. He believes that Israel is bent on expanding to include the entire Arabian peninsula. He also says that his call for holy war is reflected in the beliefs of Muslims world wide. ‘They should all unite in the fight against polytheism and they should pool all their resources and their energy to fight the Americans and the Zionists and those with them. They should, however, avoid side fronts and rise over the small problems for these are less detrimental. Their fight should be directed against unbelief and unbelievers.
(http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html)

By his words, Bin Laden has proclaimed a holy war between all Muslims and America and its allies and we are at war with him and his organization. Therefore, the minimal standards for declaring an enemy are:
1. They declare they are our enemy
2.They actually attack us.

The Taliaban in Afghanistan had never attacked us, but they were a prime support of Al Qaeda. So we added a third standard.

3. They support enemies who have attacked us.

America has attempted to convince itself and the Arab world that it is not at war with all Muslims, only the radicals. We hope that most of the world's Muslims do not see holy war against America as their own personal jihad. Only time will tell if we are correct in that assessment. Other than the Arab governments whom we support, we don’t hear much friendship in any other quarters.

Coming soon. What about the evil empire? How does Iraq fit into the picture?


3:29:06 PM    comment []

© Copyright 2004 Melvyn Polatchek.
 
June 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
May   Jul


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "On media and politics. . ." in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.