RIAA files 717 new file-trading lawsuits. WASHINGTON - The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has filed 717 new lawsuits against peer to peer (P-to-P) users allegedly trading music for free, the trade group announced Thursday. [InfoWorld: Top News]
Now, I have to ask this, as I have asked it before - how does the RIAA expect to get people interested in their product, which one has to assume is music rather than lawsuits, by issuing more lawsuits.
Now, I am all in favor of paying for your music. I honestly think it is theft to share entire albums, but I have to be honest here - of the majority of music, in print, how much of the entire album would you want? Really? Even back in the good old days, pick up any classic and tell me how many of the songs you know. If it is more than four, then the album should be immortalized. As a case in point, I will pick Dark Side of the Moon by Pink Floyd. That is an album that most people can say they know all the songs on. But unless you rip it at full size, you are cheating yourself of the experience of the album and I have to agree with the audiofiles that the vinyl version is much better than the CD - there is just something missing.
But there are few albums that fit that bill and if the members of Pink Floyd are getting all the profits owed from them, then I have some swampland in Florida, California, and Antarctica for you. But they are still entitled to their money. Is issuing lawsuits the answer? Is it going to get any positive press for the industry in general. An industry that quite honestly has not created a positive image of itself or encouraged its artists to be better musicians. There are good musicians out there and there are stellar talent promoters busting their behinds to make it. What is the RIAA doing to help them? I have to wonder, with another 700 lawsuits pending....
8:42:44 PM
|
|