|
 |
|
|
Our Closing Brief to the Court on Playa Vista Phase 2
FILED AUGUST 26, 2005
I. Respondents Affirmatively Misled The Public And The Decisionmakers Regarding The Fact That The Proposed Development Is A Substantial Increase Over What Is Currently Permitted.
II. Respondents Have Produced No Substantial Evidence To Support The EIR's Finding That The Bus Mitigation Measure Is Fully Funded Or Enforceable. III. The Discussion of the No Project Alternatives was Biased, Misleading and Inaccurate IV. Playa Urges An Interpretation Of Condition 116 That Renders It Meaningless. V. The City Failed To Proceed As Required By Law By Failing To Provide A Written Statement Setting Forth The Specific Reasons For Proceeding With The Proposed Project Despite Its Unmitigated Impacts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for the full text of the brief, click here:
http://radio.weblogs.com/0138798/gems/BEEP_Post_Trial_Reply.pdf
Also, for the press release for the filing of the case, click here: BEEP Files Lawsuit Over Playa Vista's Last Phase
|
