vulgar morality : Blogging for the relationship between morality and freedom
Updated: 7/11/2005; 5:28:14 PM.

 

Subscribe to "vulgar morality" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Best Blogs Sophistpundit
Instapundit
Gateway Pundit
Publius Pundit
RealClearPolitics
Arts & Letters Daily
Becker-Posner Blog
Bjorn Staerk Blog
Iraq the Model
North Korea Zone
Amarji
Syria Exposed
Big Pharaoh
babalu blog

 
 

Sunday, June 12, 2005

ROBERT MAYER COMMENTS ON LIBERTARIANISMMayer, of Publius Pundit, adds insight into constitutional developments since the ratification of the Bill of Rights, which I short-shrifted in my post on freedom of speech:

I love stumbling into debates like this! Where to begin. " First, with the letter of the law: the First Amendment bars Congress, and by implication the Federal Government, from interfering with free speech. Nothing is said about the right of states and localities to do the same. " Historically, this is true. I recall several states having officially sanctioned churches at the founding of the country. On the other hand, that meaning has morphed with both amendments to the Constitution and interpretation by the Supreme Court. I agree with the premise of your argument, that it prevents Congress from limiting speech, but it goes a bit beyond that. The 14th amendment "equal protections" clause effectively applies the national constitution to each individual state. Before this, the constitution was only a protection from the federal government, but this trickled it down to the state legislatures. However, it is obviously not the constitution or the accompanying laws itself that dictate what will happen. Most of the contraints (reasonable or no, that's debatable) imposed on speech etc are due to Supreme Court interpretation. This has varied from advocating violence against the U.S. government to be traitorous, to upholding that prior censorship for publication is illegal (though the after-consequences/lawsuits/etc may not be!) So it's actually the court that dictates how far Congress or the state legislatures are allowed to go. Outside of that, however, I completely agree that parents, the military, employers, etc, have the ability to curb your speech in one way or another. Being a believe in self-government and minimal federal government myself, I am only half averse to libertarianism. The problem with libertarianism is that it provides for pure freedom without assuming the consequences of responsibility for those actions. Freedom and responsibility go hand in hand if the former is to exist in its best form.


10:34:14 PM    comment []

© Copyright 2005 Vulgar Morality.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


June 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
May   Jul

Favorites

A million bloggers shouting


Art and morality


Women on the verge


Tradition and morality


Doh! Raising my kids on the Simpsons


John Paul II enters heaven


America and the Machiavellian moment


Freedom through the looking-glass


Moral monsters, viewed from afar


Freedom policy, command cultures


The liberals' freedom problem


Morality and the empty cradle


Terri Schiavo and human vanity


I,Robot vs Chinese room experiment


Thoughts on the tsunami


Jefferson and American virtue,1


Jefferson and American virtue,2


Jefferson and American virtue,3


Dictators: Moral universe of totalitarianism


Dictators: Guilt of the people