vulgar morality : Blogging for the relationship between morality and freedom
Updated: 12/1/2005; 9:33:41 PM.

 

Subscribe to "vulgar morality" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Best Blogs Sophistpundit
Instapundit
Gateway Pundit
Publius Pundit
RealClearPolitics
Arts & Letters Daily
Becker-Posner Blog
Bjorn Staerk Blog
Iraq the Model
North Korea Zone
Amarji
Syria Exposed
Big Pharaoh
babalu blog

 
 

Friday, November 11, 2005

RELIGION, HAPPINESS, AND CLUELESS ECONOMISTS:  In a delightful post, Sophistpundit takes to task a George Mason University economist, Bryan Caplan, for the latter's clueless attempts to explain religion in economic terms.  For economists, of course, human behavior hinges entirely on self-interest.  More:  on rational self-interest.  That such a description of human motivation is almost entirely wrong seems not to have hindered the development of economics, or at least the careers of economic professors.

 

Caplan, to Sophistpundit's amusement, appears genuinely perplexed by the disconnection between religion and the pursuit of happiness.  Why, then, would people believe in the Bible, and go to church?  And, market-wise, in significant numbers, too?

 

No wonder they call it the dismal science.

 

As anyone but an economist knows, there is an economy to the human heart.  It creates a demand for certain things that are beyond material self-interest.  This demand is universal, and so powerful that it will not be denied:  perverted, it can lead to self-destructive behavior, of which becoming a human bomb is among the most newsworthy today.  The religious feeling manifests itself with equal strength among secularists:  observe the inquisitional fervor, by the staff of the Smithsonian Institution, demonstrated in this incident.  Equally, belief in Marxism-Leninism, or in the fuehrer, was once a source of self-sacrificing fanaticism, often wielded against the church and the church-going.

 

But by far the most frequent means of satisfying this demand is religion, both as a faith and as an organization, and in my opinion the most frequent consequence of religion is comfort in a cruel world, or - what is the same - a glimmer of understanding in the swirl of chaos.  Does this drive us back to self-interest?  Not in any sense that an economist would recognize.  Religions like Christianity make comfort and understanding conditional on service:  to attain membership, we must, as a matter of principle, treat others as ourselves.  That nearly all religious people fail in this ideal is besides the point; nearly all of us fail in all ideals, whose purpose, except for the saintly few, is not attainment but direction-setting.  The direction of Christianity, and of all the great historical religions, is toward selflessness.

 

Go read Sophistpundit, whose take on the subject is far wittier than mine.


2:11:05 PM    comment []

© Copyright 2005 Vulgar Morality.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


November 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Oct   Dec

Favorites

A million bloggers shouting


Art and morality


Women on the verge


Tradition and morality


Doh! Raising my kids on the Simpsons


John Paul II enters heaven


America and the Machiavellian moment


Freedom through the looking-glass


Moral monsters, viewed from afar


Freedom policy, command cultures


The liberals' freedom problem


Morality and the empty cradle


Terri Schiavo and human vanity


I,Robot vs Chinese room experiment


Thoughts on the tsunami


Jefferson and American virtue,1


Jefferson and American virtue,2


Jefferson and American virtue,3


Dictators: Moral universe of totalitarianism


Dictators: Guilt of the people