vulgar morality : Blogging for the relationship between morality and freedom
Updated: 4/2/2006; 11:48:19 AM.

 

Subscribe to "vulgar morality" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Best Blogs Sophistpundit
Instapundit
Gateway Pundit
Publius Pundit
RealClearPolitics
Arts & Letters Daily
Becker-Posner Blog
Bjorn Staerk Blog
Iraq the Model
North Korea Zone
Amarji
Syria Exposed
Big Pharaoh
babalu blog

 
 

Friday, March 03, 2006

MOOD AND MORALITY:  Personality (as I have said elsewhere) is the sum of our predilections along specific axes:  gregarious or shy, brave or fearful, carefree or anxious.  Character is what we make of these predilections.  Sounds straightforward enough:   you are born with a certain potential, and you, playing off your life's circumstances, make yourself into a certain kind of person.

 

Of course, it isn't straightforward at all.  Part of the problem is that personality isn't stable.  It oscillates.  Our predilections can alter, switch direction, and catch us by surprise.  The alterations can happen after a long period of stability:  I suppose midlife crisis, the sudden explosion of adolescent behavior in individuals old enough to know better, is a good example of this.

 

But small alterations happen on a weekly and daily basis.  What used to be called manic depression, and is now termed bipolar disorder, is the pathological extreme of a normal human condition.  We have moods, and they predicate our behavior.  An interesting question, not much considered, is the effect of moods on morality.  In the grip of life-conquering moods, it seems to me, nothing can tempt or corrupt us.  With middling moods, there's a struggle.  And there are low moods, moments of ineffable weakness, when one may well be particularly susceptible to moral failure:  to drink excessively, say, or cheat on one's spouse, or overcharge the company account.

 

The concept of character presupposes the ability to override our moods.  It means resisting during low moments.  That requires a great deal of self-knowledge, plus the formation of sturdy habits.  The difficulty lies in the fact that moods color our judgment.  We don't feel changed:  we feel the world (our jobs, our families, our futures, whatever) changing around us.  I suspect many terrible decisions are made by good people in the grip of atypical despair or panic or anger.  At that point, they come to a consequential fork in the road.  If they are truly good, they will face up to any failures and begin to rebuild.  If failure is allowed to feed on itself -- if one stoops to self-pity or rationalizations -- the entire shape of a life can be warped forever, and mere mood will have shattered good character.


10:30:33 PM    comment []

© Copyright 2006 Vulgar Morality.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Feb   Apr

Favorites

A million bloggers shouting


Art and morality


Women on the verge


Tradition and morality


Doh! Raising my kids on the Simpsons


John Paul II enters heaven


America and the Machiavellian moment


Freedom through the looking-glass


Moral monsters, viewed from afar


Freedom policy, command cultures


The liberals' freedom problem


Morality and the empty cradle


Terri Schiavo and human vanity


I,Robot vs Chinese room experiment


Thoughts on the tsunami


Jefferson and American virtue,1


Jefferson and American virtue,2


Jefferson and American virtue,3


Dictators: Moral universe of totalitarianism


Dictators: Guilt of the people