|
Monday, February 07, 2005 |
Here is an interesting development in my e-mail. Apparently aware
that anything sent to me via e-mail might be fair game for publication
in my blog, a source who shall so far remain nameless sent me an
e-mail with the following text at the bottom:
this email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private
How interesting is that? In terms of specs for JOTS, this clearly
points to the need to establish some sort of preferences that can be
applied to e-mails on both a global basis (for all e-mails from a
source) and on a per-transmission basis (that overrides the
global preference).
5:37:48 PM
RadioEdit
|
|
In my experience, it has been standard operating procedure for any
checked facts on stories regarding Microsoft to be anonymously
attributed to "spokesperson" when the person fielding the inquiry works
for one of Microsoft's public relations firms such as Waggener-Edstrom
or Fleischman-Hillard. When a Microsoft employee fields such an
inquiry, the answer has always been attributable to that person.
As you can see in a recent blog entry of mine, such attribution is made. I'm fairly certain this is a Microsoft imposed policy.
This raises some issues for the JOTS specification. There should
be a way that such policies can be set as preferences in a way that
automatically includes a short document like this as the part of
a full disclosure or transparency statement for any given
story.
5:00:18 PM
RadioEdit
|
|
© Copyright 2005 David Berlind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2005 |
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Mar |
BlogRolls
Top 10 hits for media transparency on..
1. | |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. | |
7. | |
8. | |
9. | |
10. | |
| 3/23/2005; 11:21:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Categories and Current Editorial Projects*
|
|
|
|
|
|