Central Ranges LLEN CEO Library

March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Feb   Apr


 Saturday, 31 March 2007
The Eight Hour Day?.

The NYT has an article on what various US states are doing to lengthen the school day. I used to be a big fan of this plan (I think the PM still is), but the results from the class size literature make me more hesitant. Basically, we now know that reducing class size has diminishing marginal benefits, but constant marginal costs, and therefore that it isn’t sensible to keep reducing class sizes once they drop below the mid-20s. Similarly, it might be the case that lengthening the school day has diminishing marginal benefits (and the marginal costs are sure to be constant, if not increasing). So beyond 6 hours, it might be the case that it simply isn’t economically sensible to go for a longer day. Still, I’d like to see some research on the¬[sgl dagger]effects of longer school days on learning outcomes. Maybe some of the current state policies will create useful natural experiments for us.

[Andrew Leigh]
9:23:15 PM    

New TVET Australia website. The new Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Australia website is now avaliable. This website offers a range of services and support to the National Training System. It includes sections on the National Quality Council, the National Industry Skills Committee and TVET Product Services. [Vocational Education & Training Headlines]
9:21:40 PM    

How to be a great audience

(and what's in it for you...)

I participated in an interesting experiment today. I was lucky enough to attend career day with 75 eighth graders. Divided into five groups, I got to see a group at a time for about fifteen minutes each.

Within three seconds of beginning my talk, I could tell.

I could tell who had learned the skill of being in the audience and who hadn't. And I'm worried that it might be permanent.

The good audiences were all the same. They leaned forward. They made eye contact. They mirrored my energy right back to me. When the talk (five minutes) was over they were filled with questions.

The audience members that hadn't learned the skill were all different. Some made no eye contact. Some found distractions to keep them busy. Some were focused on filling out the form that proved that they had been paying attention.

What I discovered: that the good audience members got most of my attention. The great audience members got even more... attention plus extra effort. And, despite my best efforts, the non-great audience members just sort of fell off the radar.

This isn't a post about me and my talk. It's about the audience members and the choices each make. It's a choice your employees and your customers make too.

It's easy to fall into the trap of believing that information is just delivered to you. That rock stars and violinists and speakers and preachers and teachers and tour guides get paid to perform and the product is the product. But it's not true. Great audiences get more.

Great audiences not only get more energy and more insight and more focused answers to their questions, they also get better jobs and find better relationships. Because the skills and the attitude are exactly the same.

I am too much of an optimist to believe that the lousy audience members in today's program are stuck that way for life. But I know that the longer they wait, the harder it is going to be to change.

The next time someone says, "any questions," ask one. Just ask.

The next time you see a play, lead the standing ovation at the end.

The next time you have an itch to send an email to a political blogger or post a comment or do a trackback, do it. Make it a habit.

- Seth Godin [Seth's Blog]
9:19:28 PM    

The Effort Effect. The Effort Effect

Guy Kawasaki writes:


If you manage any people or if you are a parent (which is a form of managing people), drop everything and read The Effort Effect. This is an article about Stanford psychology professor Carol Dweck. It examines her thirty-year study of why some some people excel and others don't. [Hint: the answer is not "God-given talent."]

The article postulates that people have two kinds of mindsets: growth or fixed. People with the growth mindset view life as a series of challenges and opportunities for improving. People with a fixed mindset believe that they are [base "]set[per thou] as either good or bad. The issue is that the good ones believe they don't have to work hard, and the bad ones believe that working hard won't change anything.

[Emergic] [Bill: Education - International]
9:17:46 PM