Updated: 12/13/2005; 5:31:14 PM.
oguchi's Radio Weblog
        

Monday, December 05, 2005

VANGUARD Monday, December 5, 2005

Justice Uwais protests disobedience of court orders

By Ise-Oluwa Ige
Posted to the Web: Tuesday, December 06, 2005

ABUJA—CHIEF Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Muhammad Lawal Uwais, yesterday in Abuja expressed worry over increasing cases of violation of court orders  by the Federal Government, saying such conduct amounted to “an affront to the constitution and clear evidence of bad governance.” The Chief Justice of the  Federation did not cite examples of disobedience.

Uwais who warned the sitting judges in the country yesterday to sit up or be kicked out of office also tongue-lashed state governors and their counterpart legislators  for cashing in on the inadequacy of section 292 of the 1999 constitution to harass independent-minded state chief judges, remove them from office at will and thereby  undermine the independence of the judiciary.

The said section 292 of the 1999 constitution provides that the heads of the judiciary at all levels can be removed from office by the heads of the executive like the  president or the governors acting on an address supported by two thirds majority of the Senate or the House of Assembly respectively for their inability to discharge  the functions of their office or appointment (whether arising from infirmity of mind or of body) or for conduct or contravention of the Code of Conduct.
Justice Uwais talked tough yesterday, in Abuja, at the opening ceremony of the 2005 All Nigeria Judges Conference. Uwais who is due to retire from the Supreme  Court bench next June took his time to address each of the issues he raised.

On the issue of disobedience to court order, the CJN said: “Another thorny point is disobedience to court orders. This malady which was rampant under the past  military regimes has started rearing its ugly head again. In a democratic set up like ours, obedience to the constitution is paramount and imperative since all key office  holders under the constitution are made to take oaths of office which enjoins us to observe, protect and defend the constitution.

“Section 287 of the constitution provides in sub-section 3 thereof that ‘the decision of the Federal High Court, a high court, and all other courts established by this  constitution shall be enforced in any part of the federation by all authorities and persons’ so that any functionary of government howsoever placed is duty bound not  only to observe but also enforce any judgment of a court of record. Failure to do so is an affront to the constitution and clear evidence of bad governance.
“Those in authority and their agencies cannot pick and choose what court order to obey. If they feel aggrieved, the only remedy open to them is to appeal, but in the  meantime the order must be obeyed,” he said.

Addressing how the state legislators and their governors have been cashing in on the inadequacy inherent in the provisions of section 292 of the 1999 constitution to  harass the judiciary, Justice Uwais said: “Section 292 of the constitution is being employed by the state executives and legislatures to diminish the independence of the  heads of state courts and thereby the state judiciaries. So far, no less than three state chief judges and a grand khadi had been removed from office under that  procedure without recourse to the National Judicial Council.

“A fourth state chief judge has, very recently, narrowly escaped being so removed after the procedure was followed in the state House of Assembly concerned but  was left off, so to speak, with a warning by the state governor to remain of good behaviour, whatever that means, for the next one year.
“A fifth state chief judge was also lucky after being tormented, only to be told by the state House of Assembly that he was not found lacking. It may be asked: For  how long will the harassment continue? Does it indicate good governance by the states’ executives and legislatures? Must the judiciary be an appendage of the  executive despite the provisions of the constitution?

“Your Excellency, Mr President, Hon President of the Senate, Hon Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon members of the National Assembly, Hon  Ministers, My lords, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, the independence of the judiciary can only be sustained and guaranteed when there is no interference directly  or indirectly by the other arms of government or their agencies in the discharge of its duties,” he said.

Also speaking on the need for the judges to buckle up and eschew laziness or be shown the way out, Uwais said: “One other factor that affects the image of the  judiciary is the inordinate delay in the determination of cases in our courts. A quite reform by both the federal and state judiciaries has been taking place in this regard.
“To ginger up the judges, the National Judicial Council has introduced about two years ago the submission of quarterly returns by every judicial officer, for the  National Judicial Council to determine how many cases are pending before a judge and how many have been disposed off by him or her during the quarter. This will  expose lazy judges who are being made answerable for the delay in their courts. Let me once again warn that inability by a judge to discharge the functions of his  office is a ground under section 292 of the constitution for him or her to be removed from office,”  Justice Uwais warned.

The judges conference is held biennially by the judges of the nation’s superior courts. It is a statutory conference authorised since 1991 by the National Judicial  Institute Act of the same year. The on-going conference is the 7th conference to be so held since the Act came into force.

 

 
Home |About Us |Advertising | Contact
Copyright ©1998 - 2005 Vanguard Media Limited All rights reserved. 

10:27:15 PM    comment []

INDEPENDENT

Monday 5th December, 2005

HOME | Previous Page


Northern civil societies vow to scuttle power shift

 

By Sukuji Bakoji

Bureau Chief, Kaduna

 

Coalition of the civil society organisations in the North, Northern Civil Societies Forum, has vowed to muster forces to scuttle the agitation for power shift in 2007 by northern governors and elite.

The group asserted that power has not become an exclusive preserve of the North.

Addressing newsmen at the weekend in Kaduna, Chairman of the forum, Mallam Shehu Sani, took a swipe at the former heads of state of the northern extraction, governors and elite who have constituted themselves as a cabal to champion the agitation for power shift.

Sani, who is also the president of a Kaduna-based civil rights organisation, Civil Rights Congress (CRC), lampooned those agitating for power shift to the North in 2007 that they have no moral justification or high ground to speak for the North since they are doing so for their own selfish interests.

“We recognise the right of all Nigerians and groups to aspire and seek for political office, but we have a very strong reservation on the issue of this new found agitation and campaign by the northern political establishments.”

“First of all, we do not believe in the genuineness and authenticity of their struggle; and we do not believe that harassment, intimidation and blackmail against either the Federal Government or Nigeria as a whole is the best way to secure power to northern part of Nigeria by 2007.

“Also, we do not believe in the quality and the moral standing of those who are today championing the so-called northern interests on the ground that this same people that are today championing the interest of the North were the architect of the destruction of the northern part of Nigeria.”

He wondered why the sudden ballyhoo on power shift barely eight years after the South clinched power, even though the North has enjoyed it for more than three decades.

“They have been in power for over 30 years and had not used their opportunity in office for the interest of the common man in the northern part of Nigeria,” he explained.

Against this backdrop, he enjoined other credible and competent Nigerians from other parts of the country to join the presidential race, since there was nothing like rotational arrangement either in 1999 or 2003 because “Alhaji Abubakar Rimi contested the PDP primaries against Obasanjo, ditto Muhammadu Buhari at the 2003 presidential poll.”

 

 


Copyright© 2004. All Rights Reserved.
Independent Newspapers Limited
Block5, Plot 7D, Wempco Road, Ogba, P.M.B. 21777, Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria.
www.independentng.com

e-mail: info@independentng.com

Designed By INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS LIMITED

Powered By DNet.


9:54:44 AM    comment []

PUNCH
PUNCH DEC 5 2005
 
We want to fight one party dictatorship –Oumar Shittien, MDD promoter

Chief Oumar Shittien, a founding member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and one of the promoters of the Movement for the Defence of Democracy (MDD) in this interview with BUKOLA OJEME throws light on what the movement is all about. Excerpts:

Do you still consider yourself a member of the PDP?

Of course, I am. I am a founding member of the PDP, being a member of the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM) at that time we were a major component of the PDP.

From your own perspective, what is the state of the PDP, as you know it today?

The state of the party, to me, is that, from the on set, it was the peoples party, as its name implies. And when we went for elections in 1999, all the democrats in this country were mobilized into the party. At the end of the first term of four years, we started seeing signals of arbitrariness in decision- making and some executive arrogance in government as far as the party is concerned. And this gave some of us a lot of concern. We notified the leadership that, things were getting amiss.

By 2003, it was quite clear in the minds of some us that we were heading for a dictatorship. We, therefore, saw a people's party, which is being transmuted into a single party democratic dictatorship.

It has become a situation where all lovers of democracy must come together and salvage this country from dictatorship in whatever form. Nigerians do not want to be dictated to, Nigerians do not want tyranny.

You are a founding member of the MDD, what is it really about?

MDD is about ensuring that democracy is protected in all its ramifications. We must go back to history. When General Abacha did not want to hand over power to a democratically elected government, he wanted to transmute himself from the uniform to a civilian dictator by forcing all the then political parties to nominate him as their candidate. Today, there is an attempt to use the strongest political party, which is the PDP to force it to nominate somebody as a dictator. It is similar, but not with the same tactic which Abacha adopted. Anyone, who knows politics and knows Nigeria, should know, that is the plan.

Is that why MDD came about?

That is what gave birth to MDD.

It has been suggested elsewhere that those, who formed the MDD, are those who may have lost out in the PDP power equation?

How has anybody lost out in the ruling party? The point is, the National Executive of the party decided to conduct its congresses and national convention by way of affirmation. Some democrats went to court and got a court decision in their favour, that we should all submit ourselves to election. These same people refused to submit themselves to election. In fact, they have not even submitted themselves to nomination. They just write the lists of people. How can you say that anybody lost out in the power equation in PDP? If there were fair elections and some one lost election, then one would agree with you, that because the person lost out, that is why he is frustrated.

In fact, in many states, there was no real registration or revalidation as they claimed. The lists of people were prepared in the homes of some individuals and these names were sent to Ahmadu Ali. And do you call these people democrats? And you expect Nigerians to submit themselves to the whims and caprices of these people? My answer is no.

Another suggestion that has gained currency is that, MDD is in fact an alternative vehicle to keep Vice President Atiku Abubakar's Presidential ambition alive and realizable, given the clear indication that he might be denied the platform of the PDP for that purpose?

That is not true. Look at Abubakar Rimi. He was a presidential candidate, long before Atiku. What about the entire South-West? The entire South-West has imbibed MDD. Are you implying that, they do not have a presidential candidate? Are they not entitled to produce a presidential candidate? What about the South-East, where you have somebody like Orji Kalu, who was one of the first presidential candidates that have been campaigning all over the country? Are you saying that he is not a democrat?

It is not about Atiku Abubakar's ambition; there can be no ambition of any candidate, unless we stop this dictatorship. Everybody that has an ambition for presidency should keep that aside. What we are saying is, let us all come together in MDD and fight and kill the fox. We must destroy this cankerworm, called dictatorship.

A national officer was reported to have said that PDP members who are members of the MDD would be summoned to appear before the party's disciplinary committee, have you been summoned?

Nobody can summon me before any committee, because Ahmadu Ali right now is " functus officio." He has run out of functions because he no longer has the power to do so. He took over the tenure of Chief Audu Ogbeh. The tenure of Chief Ogbeh elapsed on the 10th of November. It means that the entire executive of the PDP has no mandate.

On what do you base your position?

On the basis of law. The constitution of the party gives you four years, and the four years elapsed without another election. And then, there is a vacuum, you now have to go back to the owners of the party, the founders of the party, for them to decide on who should hold the party, manage its affairs until another election is held. Otherwise, anything that is done by Ahmadu Ali now is null and void. It is illegal.

Is MDD planning to fuse into one of the existing political parties or seeking fresh registration ahead of the 2007 elections?

The MDD was not founded on the basis of fusing into any political party or the formation of a new political party. It was founded on the need that Nigeria must be saved from the cabal that is trying to transmute this country from a democracy to a dictatorship. When we met, we analyzed Nigeria's progress in our democratic experiment in the last six years and half, and we scored Nigeria very low. We felt that certain things have to be done to repair the damage done our people and country. And, of course, we have to do something to avoid our country running into a political crisis.

But you need to acquire political power in order to be able to carry the changes you envisage?

That is why we are going back to the people. They own the power. No individual in this country can ascribe to himself monopoly of power, without the people of this country. Nobody is greater than the people of this country. That is why we are appealing to the people of this country to rise up against this attempt to steal power from them.

There are speculations that, some of those who attended the MDD meeting are being trailed by security agents. Have you had any peculiar experience in this regard?

Nigeria is still suffering from military psyche. When you try to form a political party or some people feel threatened, they set security operatives after you. As far as I am concerned, that is nonsense. We are in a democratic and free society. People can decide to leave the PDP en-masse to form another party. People can decide to stay there and suffer, if it is their own wish. But it is not the business of security operatives to go around and sniff round.

SUNDAY PUNCH, December 04, 2005
Copyright 2005 Punch (Nigeria) Limited. All Rights Reserved
 Powered by dnetsystems.net dnet®

9:44:21 AM    comment []

THISDAY

Proposed Revenue Allocation Formula ‘ll Cripple States – Makarfi

From Agaju Madugba in Kaduna, 12.04.2005

Governor Ahmed Makarfi of Kaduna State has asked the National Assembly to be cautious in passing the proposed Revenue Allocation Formula Bill currently before it as the provisions of the document would adversely affect states if passed into law.
Makarfi who spoke at the weekend when he addressed the Northern Senators Forum in Kaduna also asked the legislature to take steps to intervene in redressing educational backwardness of the north.
According to the governor, the proposed Revenue Alloction Formula may actually compound the nation's problems noting that,"the formula if passed into law the way it is, will substantially reduce  the states' monthly allocations.
"Kaduna state, for instance, will reduce by as much as 25 per cent. I believe this is not a substantially differentpicture from other states.
"It would also do a world of good for us in the north and by implication the entire country if the National Assembly takes a more than cursory look at the situation of education in the north.
"I regret to say that up to this moment, we have hadly gone beyond rhetorics in our approach to this very vital issue on which the future survival of our people largely depends. That the educational system is in a terrible state especially in the north is no longer news.
“The news, as far as I am concerened,is that we still don't seem to come to the realisation that we need the concerted efforts of all of us and our friends to halt and reverse this ugly trend.
"This is because the problem is so big and multi-faceted that no one state can adequately confront it on its own.It will not be a bad idea therefore if the northern members at the National Assembly seek the understanding and cooperation of their colleagues, our brothers and sisters from other parts of the country in tackling this dangerous situation."
Makarfi also asked the senators to educate the other sections of the country on the current agitation for powershift to the north to, "to reassure our compatriots that as northern Senators meet to discuss issues of importance to the north and the country,they are not at war with anybody or any section neither are the bracing up for any.

9:36:33 AM    comment []

SUN
FEAR …in the land • Who’s next

By STEVE NWOSU
Saturday, December 3, 2005

Obasanjo, Atiku & Alamieyeseigha
Photo By: Sun News Publishing


As Governor Diepreye Alamieyeseigha battles to fend off the wolves of impeachment, a thick cloud of fear has suddenly descended on government houses across the states. Mum is the word as everyone (governors and aides alike) watch with pin-drop silence as the game of death in Yenagoa plays itself out.

Nothing probably captures the palpable fear in the land than what transpired Wednesday between a senior editor of the Sun Newspaper and a top politician who was asked to confirm the story of the arrest of the pilot who flew Governor Diepreye

Alamieyeseigha to Nigeria on the last lap of his escape from London.The official who obviously has a contrary position to that of the federal government on the Alamieyeseigha saga had to first switch off his telephone when he learnt of the reason for the call. He then called back a few minutes later on another line.

And even after confirming that the caller was a genuine journalist, barely spoke in whispers. Even as he was calling from another more secure place, he had this morbid fear that agents of the federal government had their ears to his wall. “I don’t want Baba’s trouble”, he said as he quickly ended the discussion. He would call back two times to renew his plea that his name must never be mentioned in the story.

This politician is not alone. In the last few months, THE SUN has had opportunities to ask top-ranking government officials – both at the federal and state levels – to comment on the raging Obasanjo third term debate. The findings have been rather instructive.
Not one of the respondents, including state governors, serving ministers and all manner of political office seekers and government appointees, wanted to speak on the matter. Those who eventually did, did so off-record, ensuring by themselves that the reporters tape recorder was switched off.

“My position about perpetuation in office is that if people did not leave, people like us would not have got here and you would not be here today telling me of the positive transformation that you have now seen in the state”, one governor said on the condition of anonymity. He continued: “But the truth is, there is no proof that I am the best that this state can have… and we will not know that until I leave office for another person to try his hands at the job”

If he was so opposed to the project why has he not called the president to order? “Me, I don’t want any persecution”, was the governor’s answer. If Obasanjo wants to run for third term, I will give him my support but for me, I will never run”, the governor said.
But if this particular governor would not want to be quoted on the issue, Governor Bukar Abba Ibrahim of Yobe State does not give a damn whether he is quoted or not.

But that was until recently. Ibrahim is of the opposition All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP). Several months ago, the Yobe governor had declared his intention to run for the Presidency. Asked if he would support President Olusegun Obasanjo if he decided to run for a third term, Ibrahim said he could not possible do that, since he himself would also be standing for the same election.

However, a few weeks ago, the Yobe Governor recanted. He is now ready to support Obasanjo. Saturday Sun gathered that this change of position may not be unrelated to the rampaging EFCC which has recently begun to throw its search light on the North Eastern States.
Already, those who call the shots in the not too far away Taraba State have been brought to their knees.

In Bauchi, it was only the dispatch with which the administration of Governor Ahmadu Mu’azu countered the rumours over an N800million almanac job, by presenting the actual facts that saved the face similar embarrassment. A petition had been sent to the EFCC claiming that the governor had approved contract for the 2005 calendar (mischievously referred to as ‘almanac’) for N800 million and to a company in which the governor had interest.

As it turned out, the contract had included a 13-page calendar, desk diaries and pocket diaries. Worse of all, it was awarded for less than N30 million. The company that won the contract was one which had been patronised by previous administrations in the sate. Truth prevailed and the governor got a breather.

The fear of EFCC.
Bauchi for now appears to be the only ‘free’ state in the zone. Mu’azu had himself dragged some of his thieving public officials before the EFCC. But one is never too sure with EFCC and the booming petition writing industry.

Alamieyeseigha had it coming
Prior to his arrest in London in October, Bayelsa State Governor, Chief Diepreye Alamieyeseigha was a marked man. And he knew it. But he could not be too careful because the bobby traps were everywhere. It was only a matter of time before he got caught in one of them. With his alleged record in corruption, it was unthinkable that he would go scot-free – if not now, then after he must have stepped down in 2007.

In fact, it is alleged that it was the desperation to guarantee his freedom post 2007 that made Alamieyeseigha pitch tent with the camp of Vice President Atiku Abubakar and oppose a third term for Obasanjo. He did not figure that he would walk free for one day if he eventually left office and Obasanjo was still president.

Since 2002, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was said to have had a damning file on him. But the Presidency allegedly directed the agency to stay action as the political climate – prior to the 2003 presidential election – did not seem appropriate to begin to hound governors whose co-operation was needed to secure re-election, especially when such governors were among those who only agreed to swing over to the President’s camp after several months of hesitation and high-wire lobbying.

There was equally a tell-tale petition on him before the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC). According to a Saturday Sun source, the ICPC was ready to go for the kill on the Alamieyeseigha case but was stopped in its track by a curious twist to the case: the same man who had sent the petition against the governor had found a way to make peace with the Yenagoa strong man. The story soon changed.

The petitioner whom ICPC had hoped would be its star witness had made a full u-turn and was now fighting on the side of Alamieyeseigha. The case was lost even before it started.
That had the then ICPC chairman, Justice Mustapha Akanbi, and his men licking their wounds. In fact, on retirement, Akanbi was said to have lamented that if he had all the powers, the Bayelsa governor was one man he would love to dock.

But Akanbi, a judiciary icon, had to stoop just as far as the law would permit him to go.
The story is now different. ICPC is no longer in the picture. And the Alamieyeseigha brief has been given to a new persecutor-cum-prosecutor who seems not to care too much about what the law says.

Impeachment and the EFCC
In the celebrated case of Lagos State and the Obasanjo administration, the Supreme Court had ruled that the federal government has no right whatsoever to withhold the allocation of any tier of government without recourse to the law court.

Although the federal government had foot-dragged on this ruling before it complied, it is on the strength of that judgement that it began a phased release of the allocations of the Lagos State council which it had withheld as a result of what it termed unconstitutional creation of additional local government areas by the Bola Tinubu administration.

Although the funds could not be released until a group led by Prince Bola Ajibola had found a political solution to the impasse and allowed the Presidency room to save face, the position of the law remained that it was illegal for the federal government to withhold such allocations – either to a state or local government.

But it would seem the EFCC has been reading a different copy of the statutes all along. Last week, it froze all the accounts of the Bayelsa State government, a move perceived by many as calculated at starving the embattled Governor Alamieyeseigha of funds he might need to counter the impeachment moves against him.

Interestingly too, the facts and evidence now being waved at the public are the same facts contained in the file that has been in EFCC’s custody for over three years now.
Why did the commission suddenly wake up? “Because the condition is now right”, says an official of the Ijaw National Congress. “It is not immediately you get information that you use it. You wait for the right time”.

He was confirming an earlier allegation against the Presidency that blackmail has been elevated to the status of statecraft. Government officials just collect dossiers on each other and keep them for possible blackmail sometime in the future – to perpetually keep the person or persons in check.

Money is the name of the game
As Alamieyeseigha battles to remain in office, there is a speculation that he has promised every member of the Bayelsa State House of Assembly N40 million and a Jeep each if they withdraw from the impeachment plot.

But that is not all the allegations going round. Only last week, a handful of members of the Bayelsa State of Assembly had called a press conference to draw attention to how EFCC was allegedly taking over their functions in Yenagoa. Apart from being hounded into detention and forced to sign the impeachment notice under duress, the lawmakers, led by Hon. Nimibofa Ayawei, also alleged that they were promised about N25 million each.

The dissenting lawmakers’ press statement came on the heels of another statement credited to the Speaker of the State House of Assembly that 18 out of the 24 members of the state legislative house had endorsed an impeachment notice to the governor.
Instructively, the Speaker spoke in Lagos and had remained in either Lagos or Abuja ever since. Like many in his group, the impression is that they are not safe in Bayelsa – the same Bayelsa whose cause they are fighting.

Police and soldiers have been deployed to the state and hopefully, the ‘exiled’ lawmakers will return to sit on Tuesday with a retinue of security personnel provided by the federal government. The law says they can only impeach the governor sitting in the state assembly complex, so it is expected that federal troops would provide them security cover in Yenagoa while they sit to impeach Alamieyeseigha.

A source at the national headquarters of the PDP who reassured Saturday Sun that Alamieyeseigha “would be a goner by Tuesday” hinted that the party is moving all its arsenal to Bayelsa to push through the impeachment process while Aso Rock would be watching from Abuja with keen interest.

Who’s next?
With the clock now ticking on Alamieyeseigha, there is palpable fear in the land, especially among politicians who are perceived to be opponents of President Obasanjo and the much touted third term agenda. The fear is more real with the governors who now see the situation in Bayelsa as an instructive precedence.
If Alamieyeseigha is impeached, it then becomes a matter of time before the same treatment begins to go round.
What makes it more deadly, one South West Governor told Saturday Sun, is that Obasanjo, through the EFCC, is both the accuser and the judge.

“They will be the ones to raise the allegations and they would be the same people to substantiate and adjudicate on it. It is a no win situation”, he said.
Suddenly, the procedure for impeachment has suddenly begun to run thus:
• Raise wild allegations to brand the governor a thief
• Pretend you don’t know what the constitution says on such matters
• Invite the EFCC to substantiate some of the allegations (no matter how vague)
• Pick up a few officials of the state government and throw them into cell
• Pick up members of the state house of assembly and detain and blackmail them
• Force them to sign impeachment notice or go to jail
• Send in policemen and soldiers to create the impression of insecurity (and prepare the ground for Emergency rule – if everything fails)
• Sponsor protests against the governor
• Starve the state government of funds (irrespective of the Supreme Court position) while the federal forces pump in money
• Get the PDP to suspend, or even expel the governor
• Project a handful of friendly indigenes of the state (especially those with political ambition) to speak up against their governor.
• Spirit out supportive members of the state assembly to a place where they cannot easily be reached and made better offers to back out.
• Fly them into the state assembly chambers with an army of mobile policemen to rubber stamp what has been agreed in Abuja.
• After you have achieved this, then suddenly remember that there was a constitution afterall, and then deal with the now-out-of-power ex-governor the way the constitution says you should deal with any common criminal

That way, no governor is safe. Whether they are PDP, AD or ANPP. And they all know it. For there is no governor who does not have one damning petition or another against him inside one of the EFCC files. It then becomes a question of who to take out next.
Already, a notice has been served Plateau State’s Governor Joshua Dariye – who had been left to mind his business in Jos since he pioneered the London bail-jumping bid.
The EFCC has sent a dossier on him to members of the state house of assembly to put them on notice.
Very soon too, it might not be unexpected if similar dossiers are delivered to Asaba, Benin, Adamawa, Umuahia and even Jalingo.

The governors all know this but none is bold enough to utter a word, lest it comes to them faster than would have been the case.

Third term in the mix
Not one of them appears to be in doubt that the speculated third term project might be the reason behind all these.
“If not third term and the need to remove all those who might pose stumbling blocks to it, especially those in position of power, why are we now heating up the polity simply because we want to impeach one man?” asked a chieftain of the ANPP who would still not want to be identified, eventhough he is not a member of PDP.

He reasons that “2007 is just 13 months away” and that Alamieyeseigha’s “infamous immunity” would not go beyond then. “Can’t we pick him up when he finishes his tenure?” he asked.
According to him, it is this desperation on the part of the federal government that makes one suspect that there is more to this than money laundering and corruption.

“It is bad enough that one governor has betrayed the trust of the people of his state by stealing them blind. It is one thing that somebody of the status of a state governor has brought disrepute to the country by jumping bail from a foreign court. But equally disgraceful and treacherous is the decision of the Obasanjo government to ignore the constitution of the land and turn its back on the even bigger corruption that has now been brought to bear on the impeachment project.”

However, nothing better illustrates this third term angle to the present unease in the polity than the fate that has befallen one of the biggest indigenous businessmen that have been thrown up by the Obasanjo administration in Nigeria. The man, with interest in virtually all the three key sectors of the local economy (oil, banking, telecommunications) and, who had been co-opted into the team of private sector supporters of the third term project was said to have landed himself into trouble when he suggested – at one of their meetings – that they work on an alternative candidate just in case the third term project did not scale through.

As soon as this suggestion got out, it was immediately taken to mean that the businessman was pushing the case of another presidential aspirant with whom he is believed to have an even longer relationship with. He was immediately put under fire and had to flee abroad from where he has since been making contacts and pleading for the life of his investments in Nigeria


9:18:16 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2005 oguchi.
 
December 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Nov   Jan


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "oguchi's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.