Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog :
Updated: 11/1/05; 8:04:14 AM.

 

Subscribe to "Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Michelle Pilecki: Iraq's 'Army' Ready for Civil War?.

Credit Knight Ridder with another must-read story: an inside view of the Iraqi army.

The Bush administration's exit strategy for Iraq rests on two pillars: an inclusive, democratic political process that includes all major ethnic groups and a well-trained Iraqi national army. But a week spent eating, sleeping and going on patrol with a crack unit of the Iraqi army - the 4,500-member 1st Brigade of the 6th Iraqi Division - suggests that the strategy is in serious trouble. Instead of rising above the ethnic tension that's tearing their nation apart, the mostly Shiite troops are preparing for, if not already fighting, a civil war against the minority Sunni population.

The Iraqi soldiers are way short on armor and other materiel, but have an over-abundance of resentment against the once-dominant Sunnis. KR's Tom Lasseter quotes an Iraqi sergeant major after the brigade raided the home of Sunni political leaderSaleh Mutlak : "When we are in charge of security the people will follow a law that says you will be sentenced to prison if you speak against the government, and for people like Saleh Mutlak there will be execution."

But it's not just Iraqi Sunnis who should fear the Iraqi army.

Some Iraqi troops ... [said] they were only awaiting word from the marja'iya [the ruling council of Shiite clerics] before turning on American forces. Although many Shiites are grateful for the overthrow of Saddam, they also are suspicious of U.S. motives. Those suspicions partly stem from the failure of the first Bush administration to support a U.S.-encouraged Shiite uprising against Saddam in 1991. Saddam suppressed it and slaughtered thousands.

"In Amariyah last week, a car bomb hit a U.S. Humvee and their soldiers began to shoot randomly. They killed a lot of innocent civilians. I was there; I saw it," said Sgt. Fadhal Yahan. "This happens all the time. If they keep doing this, the people will attack them. And we are part of the people."

Sgt. Jawad Majid chimed in: "We have our marja'iya and we are waiting for them to decide when the time to fight (the Americans) is, when it is no longer time to be silent."

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
8:56:00 PM    comment []

Park service screened for Bush loyalty. Park service screened for Bush loyalty [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
2:53:37 PM    comment []

African-Americans: 2% Bush approval. African-Americans: 2% Bush approval [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
2:52:47 PM    comment []

Van Jones: Police Beating Fits Pattern In New Orleans: Local Viewpoint.

I was busy writing up my reaction to that awful police beating in New Orleans that has gotten so much media attention. I was trying to situate that incident in a broader context over violent policing in the region -- before, during and after Katrina -- when my friend Jordan sent out the perfect essay on the subject. Jordan Flaherty is working valiantly on the ground in New Orleans for a just reconstruction and a better city.

Rather than subjecting you to my armchair diatribe, I want to share his words with you - straight from the frontlines. (Thank you, Jordan.)

>>>>>

Crime and New Orleans

by Jordan Flaherty

People from New Orleans were not surprised to see video of police beating a 64 year old man in the French Quarter. The only surprise is the increased attention the incident received due to the continued media focus on New Orleans, although news reports I saw took pains to point out the âo[ogonek]high levels of stressâo? New Orleans police are under.

Despite the attempts to explain away the officerâo[dot accent]s behavior, the incident fits into a well-defined pattern of police conduct in New Orleans. In the last year, seven young Black men have been killed by New Orleans police, and none of the officers involved have been punished.

This year has seen mounting evidence of a police department out of control. Less than a week before Hurricane Katrina, on Wednesday August 24, Keith Griffin, a New Orleans police officer, was booked with aggravated rape and kidnapping. According to a Times-Picayune report, âo[ogonek]Griffin is accused of pulling over a bicyclist under the guise of a police stop in the early morning hours of July 11. The two-year veteran officer allegedly detained the woman, drove her to a remote spot along the Industrial Canal near Deslonde Street, then sexually assaulted her.âo?

This is hardly an isolated incident. Another recent Times-Picayune article reported, âo[ogonek]in April, seven-year veteran officer Corey Johnson was booked with aggravated rape for allegedly forcing a woman to perform oral sex, after he identified himself as an officer in order to enter the woman's Treme home.âo?

Another article states âo[ogonek]Eight officers were arrested during a six-month stretch last year on charges that ranged from shoplifting to theft to conspiracy to rob a bank...In April 2004, 16-year veteran James Adams was booked with aggravated kidnapping, extortion and malfeasance after he was accused of threatening to arrest a woman unless she agreed to have sex with him. âo[ogonek]

Police misconduct in this notoriously corrupt city goes back decades, and occasionally it explodes in scandal. In a September 2000 report, the progressive policy institute reported âo[ogonek]a 1994 crackdown on police corruption led to 200 dismissals and upwards of 60 criminal charges, including two murder convictions of police officers. Investigators at the time discovered that for six months in 1994, as many as 29 New Orleans police officers protected a cocaine supply warehouse containing 286 pounds of cocaine. The FBI indicted ten officers who had been paid nearly $100,000 by undercover agents. The investigation ended abruptly after one officer successfully orchestrated the execution of a witness.âo?

According to one community activist I recently spoke with who is familiar with the investigations, âo[ogonek]That crackdown just scratched the surface. They didnâo[dot accent]t even really begin to address the problems in the New Orleans police.âo?

According to a 1998 report from human rights watch âo[ogonek]Former Officer Len Davis, reportedly known in the Desire housing project as âo[breve]Robocop,âo[dot accent] ordered the October 13, 1994 murder of Kim Groves, after he learned she had filed a brutality complaint against him. Federal agents had Davis under surveillance for alleged drug-dealing and recorded Davis ordering the killing, apparently without realizing what they had heard until it was too late. Davis mumbled to himself about the âo[breve]30âo[dot accent] he would be taking care of (the police code for homicide) and, in communicating with the killer, described Groves's standing on the street and demanded he "get that whore!" Afterward, he confirmed the slaying by saying âo[breve]N.A.T.âo[dot accent] police jargon for âo[breve]necessary action taken.âo[dot accent] Community activists reported a chilling effect on potential witnesses or victims of brutality considering coming forward to complain following Groves's murder.âo?

The white-flight suburbs around New Orleans are in many ways worse. During the 1980s, Jefferson Parish sheriff Harry Lee famously ordered special scrutiny for any black people traveling in white sections of the parish. "It's obvious," Lee said, "that two young blacks driving a rinky-dink car in a predominantly white neighborhood? They'll be stopped."

The New Orleans Gambit newspaper reported that 1994, âo[ogonek]after two black men died in the Jefferson Parish Correctional Center within one week, Lee faced protests from the black community and responded by withdrawing his officers from a predominantly black neighborhood. âo[breve]To hell with them,âo[dot accent] he'd said. âo[breve]I haven't heard one word of support from one black person.âo[dot accent]âo?

The Gambit also reported in April of this year that in Jefferson Parish officers were found to be using as target practice what critics referred to as âo[ogonek]a blatantly racist caricatureâo? of a Black male. Sheriff Lee laughed when presented with the charges. "I'm looking at this thing that people say is offensive," he says. "I've looked at it, I don't find it offensive, and I have no interest in correcting it."

These accusations of âo[ogonek]target practiceâo? gained force a few weeks later with the May 31 killing of 16-year-old Antoine Colbert, who was behind the wheel of a stolen pickup truck with two other teens. 110 shots were fired into the truck, killing Colbert and injuring his passengers. In response to criticism from Black ministers over the incident, Lee responded âo[ogonek]they can kiss my ass.âo?

As has been widely reported, the town of Gretna, across the Mississippi from New Orleans and part of Jefferson Parish, stationed officers on the bridge leading out of New Orleans blocking the main escape route for the tens of thousands suffering in the Superdome, Convention Center, and throughout the city.

As the LA Times reported on September 16, âo[ogonek]little over a week after this mostly white suburb became a symbol of callousness for using armed officers to seal one of the last escape routes from New Orleans âo[per thou] trapping thousands of mostly black evacuees in the flooded city âo[per thou] the Gretna City Council passed a resolution supporting the police chief's move. âo[breve]This wasn't just one man's decision,âo[dot accent] Mayor Ronnie C. Harris said Thursday. âo[breve]The whole community backs it.âo[dot accent]âo?

Arguably, the actions of the Gretna police were one of the biggest dangers to public safety to arise from this tragedy, perhaps second only to the criminally-neglected levees. Anyone that wants to focus on relief for the âo[ogonek]victimsâo? needs to focus on what exactly people from New Orleans are victims of: racism, corruption, deindustrialization, disinvestment, and neglect. That is why agencies and organizations such as Red Cross, FEMA, Scientologists, their hundreds of well-meaning volunteers are not really providing relief - they arenâo[dot accent]t addressing the nature of the problem.

We call hurricanes and earthquakes âo[ogonek]natural disasters,âo? but the contours of these disasters are manmade. As recent earthquake and hurricane-related mass deaths in South Asia and Central America demonstrate, who lives and who dies is intricately related to issues of poverty and access. Whether the homes are built in safe areas, the soundness of the structures, the length of time it takes for relief to arrive, all of these are intricately tied to poverty. And yet the media generally ignores these issues, and repeats the message that âo[ogonek]nature doesnâo[dot accent]t discriminate.âo? Because of this message, relief is misdirected, and when those receiving the relief arenâo[dot accent]t sufficiently grateful, the givers become resentful.

An article in this Sundayâo[dot accent]s New York Times reports on a community of displaced New Orleans residents in rural Oklahoma, where local residents are âo[ogonek]glad to see them go.âo? âo[ogonek]With each passing day,âo? the Times reported, they âo[ogonek]could feel the sympathy draining away.âo? The problem is the perception that this is a problem that could be fixed by a place to stay in another state, some hand-me-down clothes, and a few meals. For many of us from New Orleans, what hurts the most is the loss of our community, and charity doesnâo[dot accent]t help to heal those wounds at all. Mayaba Benu, a community activist currently in the city, told me âo[ogonek]I miss everyone. Thereâo[dot accent]s a lot of reporters here, a lot of contractors and FEMA folks, but not many people from New Orleans.âo?

While thousands of out-of-state contractors line-up for work, including hundreds of trash hauling trucks from around the US lined up near City Park, the people of New Orleans are still being excluded from opportunities to take part in the reconstruction of their city. In fact, it seems to many that out-of-state workers are more welcomed than the New Orleans diaspora.

Jenka Soderberg, an indymedia reporter and volunteer at the Common Ground Collective reports from her experience at a New Orleans FEMA compound, âo[ogonek]I went to the FEMA base camp for the city of new orleans. It made me feel sick to my stomach. We walked around this absolutely surreal scene of hundreds of enormous air-conditioned tents, each one with the potential of housing 250 people -- whole city blocks of trailers with hot showers, huge banks of laundry machines, portajohns lined up 50 at a time, a big recreation tent, air-conditioned, with a big-screen tv, all of it for contractors and FEMA workers, none of it for the people of new orleans.âo?

Inside the FEMA camp, she was told by contractors, âo[ogonek]the tents are pretty empty, not many people staying here.âo? However, âo[ogonek]we don't combine with the evacuees -- we have our camp here, as workers, and they have their camps.âo?

Soderberg comments, âo[ogonek]thousands of New Orleans citizens could live there while they rebuilt and cleaned their homes in the city.  But instead, due to the arrogance of a government bureaucracy that insists they are separate from the 'evacuees', and cannot possibly see themselves mixing with them and working side by side on the cleanup, these people are left homeless, like the poor man I talked to earlier in the day, living under a tarp with his mother buried under the mud of their house. Why can't he live in their tents?  It makes me so sad and mad to see so much desperate need, and then just blocks away to see this huge abundance of resources not being used. I have seen no FEMA center that is actually providing any aid for people -- I have been to this main FEMA base camp and three others in new orleans, and each of them have signs saying âo[breve]No public services available at this site/Authorized personnel onlyâo[dot accent]âo?

And with poor people out of the city, the developers and corporations are grabbing what they can - but there are no shoot-to-kill orders on these well-dressed looters. NPR and other media have portrayed developer Pres Kabacoff as a liberal visionary out to create a Paris on the Mississippi. The truth is that Kabacoff represents the worst of New Orleansâo[dot accent] local disaster profiteers. It is Kabacoff who, in 2001, famously demolished affordable housing in the St Thomas projects in New Orleansâo[dot accent] Lower Garden District and replaced it luxury condos and a Wal Mart. âo[ogonek]New Orleans has never recovered from what Kabacoff did,âo? one housing activist told me. âo[ogonek]It was a classic bait and switch. He told the city he was going to revitalize the area, and ended up changing the rules in the middle of the game and holding the city for ransom. He made a ton of money, the rich got more housing, and the poor got dispersed around the city.âo?

This year, Kabacoff has had his eyes on razing the Iberville housing projects, a site of low-income housing near the French Quarter. While Iberville residents were in their homes, they were able to fight Kabacoffâo[dot accent]s plans, and held numerous protests. Now that they are gone, their homes (which were not flooded) are in serious danger from Kabacoff and other developers seeking to take advantage of this tragedy to âo[ogonek]remake the city.âo?

The people of New Orleans need a voice in this reconstruction. But what would community-controlled reconstruction look like? Organizers are starting to grapple with these issues.

Dan Etheridge works with the Center for Bioenvironmental Research at Tulane and Xavier Universities. He is currently organizing to create collaborations and build partnerships between community organizations and planning professionals âo[ogonek]not because its benevolent but because we will have a better city if the community has a say in its reconstruction.âo?

He has organized an upcoming conference at Tulane University to bring together planners, architects, structural mitigation experts, geographers and other experts, along with grassroots community leaders from New Orleans, people such as âo[ogonek]the social aid and pleasure clubs, Mardi Gras Indian representatives, ACORN, building unions, artists, teachers, public housing resident councils, Peoples Hurricane Fund representatives,âo? and other community voices.

He hopes this will be âo[ogonek]the starting point for an ongoing program, a networking and organizing opportunity for autonomous public projects. we want our vision to be part of the master plan for rebuilding the city, but we want community groups to have access to the skills and funding they need for smaller projects towards reestablishing the complicated fabric of the city. Instead of falling through the cracks, we want projects to grow up through the cracks.âo?

In a press conference today outside Orleans Parish Prison Critical Resistance New Orleans organizer Tamika Middleton said âo[ogonek]Katrinaâo[dot accent]s aftermath reflects the way we as a nation increasingly deal with social ills:  police and imprison primarily poor Black communities for âo[breve]crimesâo[dot accent] that are reflections of poverty and desperation. Locking people up in this crisis is cruel mismanagement of city resources and counters the outpouring of the worldâo[dot accent]s support and concern for all survivors of Hurricane Katrina.âo?

Middleton is part of a coalition demanding an independent investigation into the evacuation of OPP and amnesty for those arrested for trying to feed and clothe themselves post-Katrina, while calling for real public safety in a rebuilt New Orleans.  âo[ogonek]Rising from the devastation of Katrina, we have an amazing opportunity to rebuild a truly new and genuine system of public safety for New Orleans,âo? said Xochitl Bervera, Co-Director of Families and Friends of Louisianaâo[dot accent]s Incarcerated Children.

Discussing FEMA and other official âo[ogonek]reliefâo? agencies, Jenka Soderberg says, âo[ogonek]its so different from how we are working at the common ground collective, or at Mama Dee's in the city, or the other community places that people are starting up -- where neighbors are helping neighbors, people just helping each other. It's so different when we are all human together, instead of a militarized, razor-wired, fenced-in compound like the FEMA camp that keeps out the people in need and keeps the contractors and workers inside.âo?

>>>>

Again, thank you, Jordan. And if you want more on-the-ground reporting, you can subscribe to Jordan Flaherty's low-volume email list. To subscribe, email jordanhurricane-subscribe@lists.riseup.net. He is always on point, like this.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
2:52:09 PM    comment []

Claim: Cheney's office opposed Miers nomination to court

10/13/2005 @ 1:35 pm

Filed by RAW STORY

Veteran conservative columnist and pundit John Fund asserts in the Wall Street Journal today that the offices of Vice President Dick Cheney and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales tried to block the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, RAW STORY has learned.

Advertisement

"A last minute effort was made to block the choice of Ms. Miers, including the offices of Vice President Cheney and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales," Fund claims. "It fell on deaf ears."

"Indeed, even internal advice was shunned," Fund adds. White House Chief of Staff Andrew "Card is said to have shouted down objections to Ms. Miers at staff meetings. A senator attending the White House swearing-in of John Roberts four days before the Miers selection was announced was struck by how depressed White House staffers were during discussion of the next nominee. He says their reaction to him could have been characterized as, "Oh brother, you have no idea what's coming."

Though he has stumped for Bush's nominee, Cheney has taken a lower profile in recent days. Last week, he skipped out of the 50th anniversary party for the National Review, a conservative heavyweight in Washington.

Cheney's chief spokesman, Steve Schmidt, recently left for Iraq, and his chief of staff is under investigation for talking to reporters about a CIA agent who was later outed by conservative columnist Robert Novak.

Some believe Cheney and Bush are at odds surrounding the leak investigation.

One conservative blogger attacked Fund's account, dismissing it as "rumor."

"I was surprised at how poorly this story was done," a poster at RedState.org wrote. "Maybe I'm letting my prejudices show, because I've made no secret of the fact that I think it's a good nomination. However this story just seemed to be a series of gossip pieces that Fund had picked up here or there... Fund doesn't say that Cheney or Gonzales were opposed, only he heard a rumor that someone in their office opposed."

The buzz in Washington is that Miers could withdraw, but such reports have not been confirmed. No senator has publicly opposed Miers nomination, though two Republican senators -- Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS) and Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KN)-- have publicly expressed concern about the nominee.

Correction: The first edition of this article incorrectly identified one of the Republican senators who have questioned Miers. The two senators are Lott and Brownback.
2:00:46 PM    comment []


Thomas de Zengotita: Asking Miers about Evolution; two responses.

ebbtide on October 11, 2005 at 09:52am commented that there's an unwritten rule against asking nominees about religious beliefs. allan, at 10:17am, replied that asking her about evolution isn't asking her about religionâo[per thou]it's asking her about science.

Exactly! That's the reason this could be done, if just one Senator takes it on. Law and science are both about logic and evidence. That's why scientific results are given such weight in court (forensics, DNA etc.). If Harriet Miers tries to wiggle away from an outright endorsement of the established conclusions and procedures of science, she could become an overnight laughing stock in the civilized world.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
1:59:22 PM    comment []

Two Percent.

At a press conference on October 4, President Bush argued that he was the right person to bridge the racial divide in America:

You address the racial divide in a variety of ways. And, obviously, the tone matters from leadership. It matters what leaders say. It matters that somebody, first of all, understands there’s a problem and is willing to talk about it. And I will continue to do so as the President.

Apparently, it isn’t working so well. A new NBC/Wall Street Journal Poll found that just 2 percent of African-Americans approve of his leadership. NBC’s Tim Russert — who called the number “a dramatic setback” — looked into it, and he could not “find a pollster who can remember any President ever getting just 2 percent approval from African-Americans.”


Russert

Watch in QuickTime Streaming.

To be fair, the margin of error on the poll is 3.4% percent. So Bush’s actual approval among African Americans could be anywhere from -1.4% to 5.4%.

Transcript below:

RUSSERT: And Matt, the most astounding number in this: 2 percent - just 2 percent - of African-Americans give George Bush a positive rating for his performance as President. The memories of Katrina very much in their minds.

LAUER: Is that what this is all about? I mean, obviously that is just a startling number, 2 percent of African-Americans. Is this all about the aftermath of Katrina?

RUSSERT: Well, the imagery of that along with the economy and fuel prices and Iraq, but that event, Matt, really did have a searing effect. George Bush and the Republican Party has tried very hard to reach out to African-American voters, but this is a very dramatic setback. I cannot find a pollster who can remember any President ever getting just 2 percent approval from African-Americans.

[Think Progress]
9:47:05 AM    comment []

Larry Beinhart: Fog Facts.

Fog Facts are things that have been made public, but have somehow disappeared into the mist.

Thereby becoming invisible.

Here are some examples: seven of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers have phoned in to say they were alive.

After the US took over Iraq, including the oil for food program, $19 billion of Iraq's money disappeared. The Florida recount, completed in 2001, showed that Al Gore got more valid, countable votes than George Bush.

What keeps us oblivious to these things is the failure to frame them, the failure of somebody to push them, and sometimes the deliberate manufacture of fog.

In turn, ignorance of the facts, keeps us from seeing the real picture.

A lot what has happened in the last six years is baffling. Let's focus on one area, our response to the 9/11 attacks.

The fog, in this case, is made of the things the administration has said. The facts are the things that they have actually done. If someone sells you a car and you notice that it eats grass and milk is coming out of the exhaust, it's pretty good bet it's a cow.

The War on Terror does not catch terrorists, especially the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11, and the people in charge don't really seem to care. That's with the expenditure of $200 billion in supplementary spending, over and above the normal cost of maintaining our military and intelligence operations.

Let's look at what they actually did, instead of what they spoke of.

That would suggest what the real goals are.

The big, obvious thing that the War on Terror permitted was for America to make its imperial lunge.

There were papers that made it clear that this was an administration goal, the most notable one posted at the Project for a New American Century, and there were statements too.

Something more subtle also took place. It is quite dangerous and it is largely unremarked.
The War on Terror permitted the administration to put an end to the concept that everyone is equal before the law.

We suddenly have people who are beneath the laws. They are called terrorists and unlawful combatants.

All it takes to make someone beneath the law is to denounce them. They then have no rights, no phone call, no lawyers. They cannot argue about what they've been called. They can be whisked off to a prison and held incommunicado and tortured. Or at least seriously abused.

It appears unlikely that this could happen to you or I or your friends across the street. But with the end of equality before the law, there really is nothing to stop it. Except our belief that our leaders are all honorable men who would not abuse such power.

Along with the creation of a class that is below the law, there is also a new class that is above the law.

The presidential legal staff, including Alberto Gonzales, Jay Bybee and John Yoo, came up with the theory that when the presidents puts on his commander-in-chief outfit, and acts in that capacity, he is not constrained by any laws. Not international law, not the laws of the United States, not by treaties and not even by the constitution.

Furthermore, anyone that he commands to do things when he is wearing that costume, is also unconstrained by those limits, statutes and laws.

They are all above the law.

In addition, we have created a three tier international system in which there are entire nations below the law: terrorist states, states the harbor terrorists and failed states.

There is, of course, one nation that is above the law. That is the United States.

I would like to take this occasion, my first appearance on the Huffington Post, to offer the first official Fog Facts Challenge!

Give us $2,000,000,000 (two hundred billion dollars) and we will deliver to you Osama bin Laden, and any ten others to be named later, or double your money back!

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
9:39:59 AM    comment []

Jane Hamsher: Judith Miller: Bustado.

I have to admit I was beginning to wonder. The cooler minds of people I respect absolutely were looking toward the simplest solution to the Judith Miller diary enigma -- namely that Miller has been cooperating with Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald all along, and he learned about her June notes during her September 30 testimony.

But sometimes being a bit of a loose cannon gives you the inside track into the psychology of wack jobs, I guess. Via Swopa, we learn that the Wall Street Journal says Miller might have been a wee bit evasive in her first appearance before the GJ:

She first appeared before the grand jury on Sept. 30 to talk about two conversations she had in July 2003. She made a second appearance Wednesday to disclose a third conversation in late June that she had previously failed to mention to the grand jury.
Over at Reuters, Adam Entous underscores the obvious question:
It was unclear how Fitzgerald learned of the June 23, 2003, conversation.
Well if you read yesterday's WSJ, her helpful lawyers leaped into the breech:
Since then, her lawyers have told Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor investigating the leak of the CIA agent's identity, that Ms. Miller's notes show that she also spoke with Mr. Libby in late June, information that was not previously given to the grand jury.
It implies they all woke up one morning and spontaneously pulled the notebook out of their collective hindquarters, with no prosecutorial prodding.

I'm not convinced.

Todays' WSJ also goes on to note that following Judy's September 30 testimony, her order of contempt was not lifted:

Her appearance Wednesday, which lasted about an hour and 15 minutes, won her a judge's order releasing her from the contempt-of-court citation that landed her in jail. The contempt order was still in place until her testimony was complete.
If Judy had gone in initially and told the GJ about the June meeting and said "oh you know, I just might have some notes," the contempt order most certainly would've stayed in place until she produced them. But she didn't do that. Her lawyers imply that her testimony was complete on the 30th, then she suddenly remembered her notes the following week, had Bob Bennett get Fitzgerald on the horn and say "St. Judith wants to step into the confessional again."

But if Fitzgerald thought Judy had told him everything on the 30th, why wasn't the contempt citation lifted then? He knew she was holding out.

I'm sticking with my initial guess -- Judy lied and Fitzgerald nailed her.

Oh but not in a biblical sense. Image be gone.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
9:35:58 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2005 Patricia Thurston.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


October 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Sep   Nov