Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog :
Updated: 11/1/05; 8:04:46 AM.

 

Subscribe to "Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Monday, October 17, 2005

Military police investigator found dead in Iraq 'felt job pressures' [World]
8:19:47 PM    comment []

Lawyer helped Miller write 'tell-all'. Lawyer helped Miller write 'tell-all' [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
8:15:16 PM    comment []

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/10/17/101317/07 IRAN: Aspens Turning, Forged Letters, Fake Terror, Real War by LondonYank

Mon Oct 17, 2005 at 07:13:17 AM PDT

The Aspens are turning - turning their sights on Iran. Fake letters. Fake terrorists. Fake exile groups. Fake news. Real bombs. Real war. It's been accelerating all year. Our analysis of Plamegate and serial failures in Iraq aren't slowing them down at all. Being reality-based is sure not going to protect us from the blowback. In this diary I follow the Libby-Miller Aspen trail all the way to Iran.

Do not forget that we in the reality-based community are at a disadvantage. While we analyse what has already happened, the Bush administration makes its own reality by moving forward to the next faith-based objective - the Ahwaz region of Iran which holds 90 percent of Iran's proven oil reserves.

Emiritus members of the Aspen Strategy Group include:

Richard B. (Dick) Cheney Judith Miller Condoleezza Rice Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey

They meet each year in August.

The neo-con wing of the Aspen Institute began targeting Iran decades ago - even holding a symposium in Persepolis, Iran, in 1975. Now 30 years later, they are ready to move in and realise their ambitions.

I think it will be air strikes on the supposed nuclear facilities, but only as a ruse to justify the occupation of the oil-rich Ahwazi region bordering southern Iraq as a "security zone".

The USA and UK regimes are manufacturing a rationale for air strikes against Iranian nuclear and military targets. I also expect occupation to the Ahwaz region. The fact that so many are on to their fraud this time has forced them to accelerate beyond prudence. I don't think they care that we know it's a fraud. They just want to have plausible deniability once the bunker-buster bombs have done their damage. They will say it is essential to occupy Ahwazi lands to create a "security zone" to prevent retailiation or aid to Iraqi insurgents. The current US/UK campaign to tar Iran with guilt for bombs around Basra is a key element in this plot.

The world may be disgusted and shocked by the carnage and devastation, but America and the United Kingdom can claim that they "had to act on the intelligence available" even if they had to manufacture the intelligence themselves through their agent Chalabi, their tame media pundits like Judith Miller and Michael Ledeen, and plants in fake exile groups in London.

While the Aspen Institute may appear bipartisan and include many individuals we approve, such as Al Gore, it provides cover for darker, more sinister enterprises. What are described as "vacations out West" may be meetings of the neo-con wing of Aspens - those "joined at the roots" of the Middle East enterprise. Their August holidays are used to plan the September disinformation campaigns that precede their wars. As Stephen Hadley famously said in 2002, "You don't launch a new product in August."

Ahmad Chalabi - convicted embezzler and fraudster, alleged counterfeiter and known forgery practitioner - is also an Aspen. He is now the Iraqi minister for oil. I believe he is the principal source for all the forged documents we know about - the WMD forgeries before the war, including the Niger uranium letter, and now for the forged Zarqawi-Zawahiri letter and the forged Iranian letters causing problems in the oil-rich Ahwaz region of Iran, conveniently adjacent to southern Iraq. Chalabi first came to the attention of Dick Cheney and the neo-con warmongers through the Aspen Institute according to the Wall Street Journal:

State Department and CIA officials mistrust the wealthy, American-educated Mr. Chalabi, who was convicted in a Jordanian banking scandal more than a decade ago. But Mr. Cheney and his senior staff have remained stubborn advocates of Mr. Chalabi, a man they first got to know in the mid-1990s at the barbecues and golf games held at private seminars hosted by groups such as the Aspen Institute. Chalabi has been involved with Aspen Institute Berlin. Jeff Gedmin, director of the Aspen Institute Berlin, will now become number 2 to John Bolton at the United Nations. Of course, Judith Miller, ASG Emiritus, used Chalabi and psuedo-defectors supplied by his Iraqi National Congress as a principal source for all the warmongering articles published by the New York Times in the run up to invasion in 2002 and 2003.

The CIA and Israelis equipped Chalabi with a huge forgery operation in northern Iraq for production of much of the pre-war "intelligence" which supported the WMD threat. I don't have to wonder what it's being used for today with so many forged letters popping up in the region.

Chalabi is a frequent visitor in Iran. One journalist even described his summer holidays there as "like the Aspen Institute Persia". We know he passes intelligence to the Iranians, he may also have a hand in setting the stage for invasion of the Ahwazi region. As oil minister in Iraq, the Ahwazi oil fields will come under his control once occupied by the coalition. Ahwaz was part of Iraq at the turn of the last century, and I'm sure Chalabi and his Bushco friends would like its oil to be under Iraqi dominion again.

In April Michael Ledeen - yes, the neo-con warmonger Niger uranium forgery guy - called on President Bush to get on with it and attack Iran following riots in the Ahwaz region. In his piece in the National Review he closes with, "Enough already. Let's Roll."

Ledeen quotes with approval the founder of a group set up here in Britain just last December: The British Ahwazi Friendship Society. BAFS was first to publish an English translation of a forged letter which was used to start riots in Ahwaz, Iran, and hyped the casualties and arrests in the Western media. I thought then the forgery sounded like Chalabi's work and wrote about it here, here and here. I was almost convinced I had wrongly maligned BAFS founder Mr Brett until I learned that he organised a similar Swazi exile group in 2002 which was implicated in riots, bombs and strikes in Swaziland. See this (Swazi Solidarity), this and this. Too much of a pattern for coincidence in my book, even if the guy pretends to be a bleeding-heart left-winger.

Are there British connections to Aspen? Oh yes, my children! Lord Charles Powell. Formerly of the Diplomatic Service and Private Secretary to then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, is a Trustee of the Aspen Institute. His brother Jonathan is Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Condi was in Britain this weekend. I fear she is marketing the "let's roll" policy to Bush's poodle Tony Blair as Iran headlined their meeting. With an oil crisis already roiling, she ratchets up the hysteria.

Judith Miller - who spoke at the Aspen Strategy Group in 2003 on "What About Iran Should (or Shouldn't) Concern You" - will indeed have "work to do", as Scooter suggested. He wants her to focus on areas of interest already to the Aspen Institute: Biological threats and the Middle East.

Add to this the Ahwazi bombs of the weekend which killed six and injured scores. Iran blames the British. With British commandos being caught in wigs and costumes, carrying no ID, in a car loaded with explosives, detonators and automatic weapons across the border in Basra last month, the Iranians may have some legitimate grounds for suspicion on their side. We have never been told what these commandos were engaged in - but the bomb-making equipment displayed in the police station afterwards for the media needed little elaboration.

Since the Basra fiasco, Britain has loudly accused Iran of involvement in attacks on British soldiers, asserting that the detonator technology used to kill 8 British troops came from Iran. It was revealed yesterday that the detonators are in fact of British military origin, although provided to the IRA and other terrorist groups in a botched sting operation.

On BBC Newsnight last week, the foreign secretary Jack Straw indicated that British troops may well be operating across the border in Iran already. The Conservative shadow foreign secretary has written to Tony Blair demanding a clarification of whether British troops are operating in Iran.

I was therefore shocked and disturbed at Jack Straw's response when asked on Newsnight if British troops would be allowed to 'cross into Iran if it's necessary'. The Foreign Secretary replied that 'it's not for me to speculate on the tactics which the British military would use.' Sending our Armed Forces across an international border clearly is a major political decision, with profound implications for Britain's international relations. It is inconceivable that military commanders would permit their troops to cross an international border without explicit political authorisation to do so. That clearly would be a decision solely for your Government.

General MacArthur had a dictum: "When in doubt, attack." I think the Aspens are following that dictum today. While we analyse, they will change our reality. Despite Plamegate and pending indictments and plunging popularity, the Aspens are turning - toward Iran. They are setting the stage to seize the Ahwazi region as a "security zone" - and control at a stroke nearly a fifth of global oil reserves.

I pity the Ahwazi region. The Iranian regime may be bad, as Saddam was bad, but the people have homes, schools, jobs, electricity, healthcare, clean water, sewers, food, the rule of law, and relative security. The dominion of the coalition troops and Ahmad Chalabi is guaranteed to be much, much worse in every respect.

Tags: Iran, Iraq, Aspen Institute, Aspen Strategy Group, Judith Miller, Dick Cheney, John Bolton, Ahmed Chalabi, Ahwaz, Michael Ledeen, Scooter Libby, Condoleezza Rice, James Woolsey, Air Strikes, Basra, Tony Blair, propaganda, WAR (all tags)
2:43:11 PM    comment []


BREAKING: Barber Cancels Ed Schultz’s Debut on Armed Forces Radio.

Armed Forces Radio (AFR) is a station that is broadcast to American troops overseas through “over 1,000 outlets in more than 175 countries.” It currently features an hour of programming from right-wing host Rush Limbaugh. There is http://harkin.senate.gov/news.cfm?id=222737">no comparable progressive program.

Today, that was supposed change. Ed Schultz [base ']Äì the most popular progressive radio show in the country — was supposed to start broadcasting on Armed Forces radio. Jones Radio, the company that syndicates the Ed Shultz show, received an email on September 29 from an Armed Forces Radio official confirming that one hour of the Ed Schultz show would begin airing today, October 17.

But morning this at 6AM, the producer of the Ed Schultz show, James Holm, received a call from Pentagon communications aide Allison Barber. She told Holm that she was calling so early to let Schultz know his show would not begin airing on AFR today. You’ll remember Barber as the aide caught coaching troops before a photo-op with President Bush last week.

Barber told Holm that the Ed Schultz show would not start on AFR today because her boss, Pentagon spokesman Larry DiRita, was out of the country and couldn’t approve it. Barber also said she was going out of the country soon for a week-and-a-half. Holm asked Barber if the show would begin when DiRita and Barber returned. Barber said she couldn’t guarantee that.

Here’s the really interesting part. Barber told Holm she heard Ed announced that he would begin on AFR during his show Friday. Schultz’s show Friday began with audio outtakes of Barber sounding foolish as she rehearsed the troops “Q&A session” with Bush.

[Think Progress]
2:00:31 PM    comment []

Vote Totals Under Inquiry in 12 Iraqi Provinces, Panel Says. "Unusually high" vote totals in 12 provinces raised the possibility that the results could be called into question. By DEXTER FILKINS. [NYT > Home Page]
1:48:39 PM    comment []

YOU MIGHT RECALL WHEN I FIRST POSTED THE STORY OUT OF GREAT BRITAIN OF A PHYSICIAN WHO SAID AT HER HOSPITAL THEY DID EUTHANIZE PATIENTS.

LOOKS LIKE SHE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH AFTER ALL ....

215 Katrina deaths under investigation. 215 Katrina deaths under investigation [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
12:42:44 PM    comment []


Miller: 'Totally wrong' on WMD stories. Miller: 'Totally wrong' on WMD stories [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
10:25:28 AM    comment []

FUNNY, WHEN I READ JUDY'S PERSONAL ACCOUNT, SUCH THAT IT IS, THIS STUCK OUT LIKE A SORE THUMB TO ME TOO.

WHAT BUSINESS DOES A JOURNALIST HAVE GETTING A SECRET SECURITY CLEARANCE, HAVING ACCESS TO INFORMATION SHE CANNOT SHARE WITH EDITORS NOR WITH THE PUBLIC? ARE WE TO BELIEVE THAT DOES NOT COMPROMISE HER REPORTING? ISN'T THIS AS CLOSE TO PUTTING HER ON THE FEDERAL PAYROLL AS YOU CAN COME WITHOUT ACTUALLY ISSUING HER A CHECK?

Did Times Miller get secret clearance?. Did Times Miller get secret clearance? [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
10:21:56 AM    comment []


Times Miller accepts indefinite leave. Times Miller accepts indefinite leave [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
10:17:57 AM    comment []

Ed Solomon: Judy on Judy.

If you look through the Judy Miller piece, it's hard NOT to find a statement that can't be plausibly denied in a court of law. In other words, she's never actually holding herself accountable. Almost every paragraph seems to contain an "as I recall" or an "according to my notes," and none of it is actually revealing of anything. And all of it -- if confronted later with contradictory evidence -- can be legally wiggled out of. It seems substantively ambiguous while trying to appear painstakingly accurate. It's a case of "facts" obfuscating "truth." It's disembodied. It's almost as if she's doing a sociological study of herself with herself as an object of observation whom she doesn't really know personally. It's as if she weren't actually living within herself at the time these things happened. As if there's this curious person -- "Judith Miller" -- whom she's been assigned to observe from a distance and is now writing up a summary of what she saw. It's weirdly detached and written, it seems to me, with a lot of advice and revision from a team of lawyers. I think it's total bullshit.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
10:13:28 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2005 Patricia Thurston.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


October 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Sep   Nov