Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog :
Updated: 1/2/06; 8:11:33 AM.

 

Subscribe to "Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Monday, December 26, 2005

After President Bush reportedly 'Pressed Papers to Kill Scoops on Domestic Spying, Secret Prisons,' the editorial page editor of Barron's argued that "The members of the House Judiciary Committee ... ought to ... report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment." [Cursor.org]
11:00:05 AM    comment []

Amid reports that the National Security Agency 'gained the cooperation of American telecommunications companies,' permitting them "access to some of the country's main telephone arteries," William Arkin's "guess is the government decided after 9/11 to monitor everyone." [Cursor.org]
10:59:29 AM    comment []

Federal officials have confirmed and defended the existence of a secret program -- first reported by U.S. News & World Report -- to monitor radiation levels at over a hundred Muslim sites in Washington, D.C., and other U.S. cities, "although no search warrants or court orders were ever obtained." [Cursor.org]
10:58:18 AM    comment []

Surveillance myths debunked..

Good work by MSNBC and the Washington Post.

[Think Progress]
10:36:31 AM    comment []

Cenk Uygur: Freedom Isn't Free.

It doesn't take courage to throw a punch. It takes courage to take a punch.

Nelson Mandela isn't a hero because he was the most vicious. Mahatma Gandhi didn't save his nation by being the most violent. Martin Luther King wasn't courageous because he was the most vengeful. All of these men had one thing in common - they knew how to take a punch - and not punch back.

Is America that brave? Is America that courageous? Is America that heroic?

We got hit on September 11th. And what was our reaction? Courage under fire? Grace through trying times? No, blind, angry, purposeless vengeance. Not just at our enemy, but at ourselves.

What would have taken courage is a measured, just response. What took easy cowardice was fire in all directions. For the love of God, we attacked the wrong Middle Eastern country ... and we're not even sorry.

We lost 3,000. We killed over 30,000 in the wrong country. There were no Iraqis on those planes. Saddam had nothing to do with those attacks - and yet, we callous, wrapped in freedom's glory, are unmoved. We say in our boastful ignorance, they had it coming.

Who? Who? Who had it coming? The man who hit us sits comfortably in northern Pakistan, in allied territory, laughing at the blind, dumb beast swinging wildly to and fro. Creating more bodies and souls for his fight.

But worse than our grotesque disregard for a just fight and the right enemy, we have done violence to ourselves and to our principles.

Is this all it took for us to throw our values away? We get hit once, and we run from our principles like untested men who lack the courage of their convictions. We say we believe in rights, we believe in liberties, we believe in freedom. And the minute we're struck, we're ready to throw those away in the name of unattainable absolute security. Is the price of freedom so cheap?

Snake oil salesmen have been trying to sell people a false sense of security for time immemorial. Our founding fathers tried to warn us of men like these. They tried to protect us by writing inalienable rights into our founding document. Are we going to give up what they fought so hard for just because we're scared now?

Brave men have defended that constitution for hundreds of years through many more wars far bloodier than this. And for all that sacrifice, we are ready to roll up those rights they died for at the first sign of trouble. Will we be remembered as the generation of cowards who gave up our freedom after the first volley?

It's easy to succumb to an authority figure who promises more security. It's hard to stand together against what might be more violence directed at all of us. It's easy to give up your rights for what you think is a little more safety. It's hard to fight for those rights in the face of bullies and enemies, foreign and domestic.

Their leader says his people don't need liberties, they just need his divine guidance. Our leader says something similar. He says he will protect us by taking away some of our rights and that we should put our trust in him because he is led by God.

I say he is a charlatan and a coward.

If a man believes in America, he fights for her principles. He doesn't cut and run from the US constitution. America isn't the people who live in it. There have been many people who have come and gone and called themselves Americans. Our soldiers didn't fight for them. We will come and go, and our soldiers do not fight for us. They fight for something more noble, more grand. They fight for the idea that is America.

They fight so that men may be free. They fight so that we do not bow to one man who rules us all. They fight so that we may have rights that cannot be taken or given away. They fight so that we may believe whatever we choose. That is called liberty. That is called America.

If we give up on this dream today, history will never forgive us. It is easy to punch back, it is easy to launch bombs. It is difficult and brave to brace yourself for another hit while having the courage to say I will not buckle, I will not crumble, I will not betray myself.

Will we stand for American principles of justice and show the world what we're made of? Or will we run from ourselves and fight the ghosts of enemies that never were and fears that never end?

I believe in America. Now, I wonder, does America believe in itself?

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
10:33:27 AM    comment []

Big Brother just got a whole lot bigger..

The New York Times reveals the Bush administration has “traced and analyzed large volumes of telephone and Internet communications flowing into and out of the United States.” The Boston Globe has a related story about how the government has been tracking all American international communications.

[Think Progress]
10:24:19 AM    comment []

Barrons:.

Willful disregard of a law is potentially an impeachable offense. It is at least as impeachable as having a sexual escapade under the Oval Office desk and lying about it later. The members of the House Judiciary Committee who staged the impeachment of President Clinton ought to be as outraged at this situation. They ought to investigate it, consider it carefully and report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment.”

[Think Progress]
10:19:42 AM    comment []

Courts Criticize Judges' Handling of Asylum Cases. Federal appeals court judges have repeatedly criticized immigration judges for what they call a pattern of biased and incoherent decisions. By ADAM LIPTAK. [NYT > Home Page]
10:03:20 AM    comment []

Scholar Stands by Post-9/11 Writings On Torture, Domestic Eavesdropping . John Yoo knows the epithets of the libertarians, the liberals and the lefties. Widely considered the intellectual architect of the most dramatic assertion of White House power since the Nixon era, he has seen constitutional scholars skewer his reasoning and students call for his ouster from the... By Peter Slevin. [washingtonpost.com - washingtonpost.com - elections, campaigns, government and politics news and headlines.]
10:01:01 AM    comment []

Bush Presses Editors on Security . President Bush has been summoning newspaper editors lately in an effort to prevent publication of stories he considers damaging to national security. By Howard Kurtz. [washingtonpost.com - washingtonpost.com - elections, campaigns, government and politics news and headlines.]
10:00:02 AM    comment []

Dear Consortiumnews.com Readers,

The United States is facing a political crisis almost unparalleled in our history, a crisis uniquely dangerous because at its center it is not about a loss of power but about a loss of principle [^] and even morality.

Instead of following the guideposts of a democratic republic, the U.S. government has veered off into delusions of empire. Instead of promoting international law, it has adopted theories of [base "]preemptive[per thou] war. Instead of standing for human rights, it has become known for torture techniques, detentions without trial, and secret prisons.

Yet, this American crisis is also about the manipulation of information [^] and the failure of the U.S. news media to do its job. Indeed, it is hard to envision that the United States would be in this fix if reporters had asked the tough questions, if they had held dishonest political leaders accountable, if reporters had shown more courage.

But this failure of the U.S. media wasn[base ']t an accident or simply a reaction to the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Taming the news media has been a longtime goal of the neoconservative operatives who now dominate George W. Bush[base ']s administration.

For years, these neoconservatives have understood that before they could transform the United States into their dream of a uni-polar empire, they had to gain effective control of the information that flows through Washington [^] and they had to neutralize the honest journalists who got in the way.

The neoconservatives knew the power that would come from controlling how Americans saw the world, a process they called [base "]perception management.[per thou] So, over the past quarter century, the neocons and their political allies invested heavily in building their own news media and intimidating the mainstream press.

That is where our Web site, Consortiumnews.com, comes in.

A decade ago, after working many years as an investigative reporter for mainstream news outlets, such as the Associated Press and Newsweek, I felt that a new kind of media institution was needed, one with the courage to resist the pressures brought to bear on journalists. (I had experienced that pressure in the 1980s and early 1990s while investigating what became known as the Iran-Contra scandal.)

So, in 1995, on the advice of my oldest son, Sam, we turned to a new medium, the Internet. I cashed in my Newsweek retirement account to raise the money to get started and we began building our Web site as a home for well-researched journalistic stories that had no place in the sensationalistic, trivialized news media of the mid-1990s.

Since then, we have produced hundreds of important stories that illuminated how our nation drifted into the predicament it[base ']s in today. Among our investigative projects:

--We traced the origins of Republican contacts with Iran[base ']s Islamic fundamentalist regime back to secret meetings during the pivotal 1980 presidential campaign.

--We exposed the hidden history of covert arms deals between the Reagan-Bush administration and Iraq[base ']s Saddam Hussein in the 1980s.

--We showed how international money-launderer Sun Myung Moon used his mysterious wealth to corrupt the American conservative movement and build the Right[base ']s media.

--We laid out the real story behind the myth of Colin Powell, a man whose sterling reputation masked a long record of opportunism.

--We explained how Election 2000 was distorted first by bad reporting, then by inaccurate vote tallies, and finally by more bad reporting.

--We questioned George W. Bush[base ']s case for war in Iraq and his risky military strategy that was based on dangerous wishful thinking. By contrast, most of the U.S. news media was wrapping itself in the American flag and doing features on [base "]freedom fries.[per thou]

While we[base ']ve accomplished much with our decade-old Web site, we[base ']ve been hobbled by a chronic shortage of money. At a crucial juncture in early 2000, I had no choice but to make the Web site part-time and take a decent-paying job as an editor at Bloomberg News. (In 2004, I left that job to write Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and try to rebuild Consortiumnews.com.)

For our survival, we remain dependent on the generosity of our readers. (We have appealed to many large funders for help, but they have not been supportive. They don[base ']t seem to understand the need.)

So, if you can, we would deeply appreciate your help.

You can contribute either by credit card online or by sending a check to Consortium for Independent Journalism (CIJ), Suite 102-231, 2200 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22201. For contributions of $100 or more, you can get an autographed gift copy of Secrecy & Privilege or one of my other books. Also, since we are a non-profit 501-c-3 organization, your contribution is tax-deductible.

Thank you -- and best wishes for the New Year.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.'
9:57:47 AM    comment []


© Copyright 2006 Patricia Thurston.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


December 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Nov   Jan