Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog :
Updated: 2/1/06; 10:06:11 AM.

 

Subscribe to "Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Wednesday, January 4, 2006

Charlie Cray: 11 Miners Dead -- Will Justice Get the Shaft?.

The Sago, West Virginia mining tragedy should spur an investigation into the causes of this crime. Yes, crime. Although the company says it was caused by an act of God (lightning), it cannot be trusted given that it initially concealed the fact that the miners died, misleading their families into a false sense of hope.

According to NPR's Daniel Zwerdling, the company also has a record of very serious violations, including a "high degree of negligence," twice the average number of injuries, etc. The mine was forced to shut down 15 times in the last year alone.
Given the fact that the government rarely shuts down mines, this is off the scale.

If anything good could come out of a disaster like this, it should be to spur a broader debate about the inadequacy of corporate homicide law enforcement in the U.S.

More so since Sago is no anomaly, but rather one of numerous major work-related accidents that have occurred in recent years.

Last March, for example, an explosion ripped through a Texas City refinery, killing 15 people and injuring 170. ( BP leads the US refinery industry in worker deaths - with 22 fatalities in 8 accidents since 1995. The oil giant was already on an OSHA "watch list" based after a 2004 explosion killed two pipefitters.)

In September the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board announced an unprecedented workplace safety fine of $21 million.

Big fines like that are rare for workplace disasters, although there have been a few in recent years. Last March, Motiva, an oil refinery owned by Shell Oil, pled guilty to negligently endangering workers and committing environmental crimes in Delaware. Motiva-Shell was prosecuted by the Delaware Attorney General and ordered by a Delaware court to pay a $10 million fine and sentenced to three years probation.

Before the BP and Motiva fines the largest fine in the history of environmental and workplace safety enforcement was $11 million imposed on IMC Fertilizer, in Sterlington, Louisiana, in 1991 after an explosion killed 8 workers and injured 128.

Nevertheless, fines are usually just a fraction of a large corporation's annual revenues (in BP's case, just 2 hours of the company's annual revenue stream). As such, they constitute a mere slap-on-the-wrist as sanctions. Too often, the value of a corporation's stock rises upon the announcement of such settlements, because it means the uncertainty and adverse publicity resulting from the incident will diminish with time.

When it comes to workplace death, big accidents that get some news coverage like Sago are just the tip of the iceberg. According to government figures gathered by the AFL, nearly 6,000 or so workplace deaths each year (not to mention the 50,000 or so who die from work-related diseases). But with the occasional exception of excellent investigative series like Mike Casey's series for the Kansas City Star, it rarely strikes us as a big problem. Until we are personally affected.

Although sometimes local prosecutors get riled up by these cases, it's rare that the feds crack down on this type of corporate crime. In December 2003 the Department of Justice indicted senior managers at a New Jersey foundry on charges of conspiring to violate safety and environmental laws and repeatedly obstructing government investigations into workplace dangers. The NJ foundry is owned by McWane Corporation, the largest manufacturer of cast-iron pipes. The Department of Justice called it a pioneering indictment - by using federal conspiracy statutes they avoid the sentencing limitations under the OSHA misdemeanor rule. But indictments such as those issued against McWane executives are very rare. And it came on the heels of a major investigation by the New York Times.

Meanwhile, on the Hill, the West Virginia accident should give renewed impetus to the "Wrongful Death Accountability Act," introduced by Senators Corzine and Kennedy introduced bills in 2003 and 2005. The bill calls for increased penalties for deaths resulting from willful failure to comply with safety regulations to a felony with a maximum of ten years imprisonment for corporate executives.

That's the kind of reaction the families of the dead miners should expect from Congress. And the kind of response we've seen in other countries.

For example, in 1992, an explosion at the Westray mine in Nova Scotia killed 26 miners. A subsequent investigation traced the cause of the disaster to numerous violations of health and safety regulations. The judge who investigated concluded that senior executives had been grossly negligent, recommending that the government of Canada, through the Department of Justice, institute a study of the accountability of corporate executives and directors for the wrongful or negligent acts of the corporation and "introduce in the Parliament of Canada such amendments to legislation as are necessary to ensure that corporate executives and directors are held properly accountable for workplace safety." (To learn more, go here.)

A decade later, after numerous consultations with industry and other experts, a bill known as the "Westray bill" was passed by the Canadian Parliament.

Under Canada's new law, if anyone with supervisory authority in a corporation (not just top executives) knows about a crime committed by employees, or does nothing about corporate operations that will likely result in a crime being committed, then both the individuals and the corporation can be found guilty.

Prosecuting both the culpable individuals and the company sometimes makes sense. The latter because it creates an deterrent incentive for companies which, if convicted, can face huge potential consequences from adverse publicity and/or debarment sanctions making them ineligible for government contracts.

Yet as the Corporate Crime Reporter recently reported, it is becoming increasingly rare for prosecutors to charge the corporation. Instead, federal and state prosecutors are increasingly offering major corporations special deals (known as deferred prosecution or non prosecution agreements) in exchange for cooperating with its investigation and prosecution of culpable executives (the "bad apple" strategy). (This is especially the case with financial crimes.)

Ever since the prosecution of Arthur Andersen, prosecutors have either been overruled when trying to go after companies (or firms, like KPMG) and told to use the deferred prosecution agreements instead, even though such agreements were originally intended only to apply to minor drug and juvenile delinquency cases (which were clogging the courts).

"It used to be that major corporations caught committing serious crimes would be brought to justice -- convicted of a crime and sentenced," says Russell Mokhiber, editor of the Corporate Crime Reporter. "No longer."

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
1:53:34 PM    comment []

James Moore: Branded.


There are times in which it is easy to be suspicious. We can get to that feeling fairly quickly if we even pay slight attention. I've been trying to get over this odd emotion for at least a year. I can't find any rationale for letting it go, though I want desperately not to have these thoughts.

This week last year I was preparing for a trip to Ohio to conduct interviews and research for a new book I was writing. My airline tickets had been purchased on line and the morning of departure I went to the Internet to print out my boarding pass. I got a message that said, "Not Allowed." Several subsequent tries failed. Surely, I thought, it's just a glitch within the airline's servers or software.

I made it a point to arrive very early at the airport. My reservation was confirmed before I left home. I went to the electronic kiosk and punched in my confirmation number to print out my boarding pass and luggage tags. Another error message appeared, "Please see agent."

I did. She took my Texas driver's license and punched in the relevant information to her computer system.

"I'm sorry, sir," she said. "There seems to be a problem. You've been placed on the No Fly Watch List."

"Excuse me?"

"I'm afraid there isn't much more that I can tell you," she explained. "It's just the list that's maintained by TSA to check for people who might have terrorist connections."

"You're serious?"

"I'm afraid so, sir. Here's an 800 number in Washington. You need to call them before I can clear you for the flight."

Exasperated, I dialed the number from my cell, determined to clear up what I was sure was a clerical error. The woman who answered offered me no more information than the ticket agent.

"Mam, I'd like to know how I got on the No Fly Watch List."

"I'm not really authorized to tell you that, sir," she explained after taking down my social security and Texas driver's license numbers.

"What can you tell me?"

"All I can tell you is that there is something in your background that in some way is similar to someone they are looking for."

"Well, let me get this straight then," I said. "Our government is looking for a guy who may have a mundane Anglo name, who pays tens of thousands of dollars every year in taxes, has never been arrested or even late on a credit card payment, is more uninteresting than a Tupperware party, and cries after the first two notes of the national anthem? We need to find this guy. He sounds dangerous to me."

"I'm sorry, sir, I've already told you everything I can."

"Oh, wait," I said. "One last thing: this guy they are looking for? Did he write books critical of the Bush administration, too?"

I have been on the No Fly Watch List for a year. I will never be told the official reason. No one ever is. You cannot sue to get the information. Nothing I have done has moved me any closer to getting off the list. There were 35,000 Americans in that database last year. According to a European government that screens hundreds of thousands of American travelers every year, the list they have been given to work from has since grown to 80,000.

My friends tell me it is just more government incompetence. A tech buddy said there's no one in government smart enough to write a search algorithm that will find actual terrorists, so they end up with authors of books criticizing the Bush White House. I have no idea what's going on.

I suppose I should think of it as a minor sacrifice to help keep my country safe. Not being able to print out boarding passes in advance and having to get to the airport three hours early for every flight is hardly an imposition compared to what Americans are enduring in Iraq. I can force myself to get used to all that extra attention from the guy with the wand whenever I walk through the electronic arches. I'm just doing my patriotic duty.

Of course, there's always the chance that the No Fly Watch List is one of many enemies lists maintained by the Bush White House. If that's the case, I am happy to be on that list. I am in good company with people who expect more out of their president and their government.

Hell, maybe I'll start thinking of it as an honor roll.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
1:15:25 PM    comment []

FORMER FEMA CHIEF VOWS TO MAKE NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS BY MARCH 1 - Michael Brown Apologizes For Delay. Former Federal Emergency Management Agency director Michael Brown said today that he had not yet made his New Year's resolutions for 2006 but vowed to have them done by March 1 "at the very latest."  By Andy Borowitz . [Borowitz Report]
10:30:53 AM    comment []

Bush/Cheney '04 to donate Abramoff funds. Bush/Cheney '04 to donate Abramoff funds [The Raw Story | A rational voice - Alternative news]
10:30:11 AM    comment []

Published on Tuesday, January 3, 2006 by Reuters US Rep. Murtha Says He Wouldn't Join Military Now WASHINGTON - Rep. John Murtha, a key Democratic voice who favors pulling U.S. troops from Iraq, said in remarks airing on Monday that he would not join the U.S. military today.

A decorated Vietnam combat veteran who retired as a colonel after 37 years in the U.S. Marine Corps, Murtha told ABC News' "Nightline" program that Iraq "absolutely" was a wrong war for President George W. Bush to have launched.

"Would you join (the military) today?," he was asked in an interview taped on Friday.

"No," replied Murtha of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House of Representatives subcommittee that oversees defense spending and one of his party's leading spokesmen on military issues.

"And I think you're saying the average guy out there who's considering recruitment is justified in saying 'I don't want to serve'," the interviewer continued.

"Exactly right," said Murtha, who drew White House ire in November after becoming the first ranking Democrat to push for a pullout of U.S. forces from Iraq as soon as it could be done safely.

At the time, White House spokesman Scott McClellan equated Murtha's position with surrendering to terrorists.

Since then, Bush has decried the "defeatism" of some of his political rivals. In an unusually direct appeal, he urged Americans on December 18 not to give in to despair over Iraq, insisting that "we are winning" despite a tougher-than-expected fight.

Murtha did not respond directly when asked whether a lack of combat experience might have affected the decision-making of Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and their former top deputies.

"Let me tell you, war is a nasty business. It sears the soul," he said, choking up. "And it made a difference. The shadow of those killings stay with you the rest of your life."

Asked for comment, a Defense Department spokesman, Lt. Col. John Skinner, said: "We have an all-volunteer military. People are free to choose whether they serve or not."

"Our freedom of speech in this country allows all of us the opportunity to voice an opinion. It's one of our great strengths as a nation," he added in an e-mailed reply.

The White House had no immediate comment.

© Reuters 2006

###
9:15:31 AM    comment []


© Copyright 2006 Patricia Thurston.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


January 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Dec   Feb