Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog :
Updated: 3/3/07; 7:33:30 AM.

 

Subscribe to "Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Friday, February 16, 2007

John R. Bohrer: Al Franken, FDR's Freedoms, & the Third Way.

Al Franken launched his announcement video yesterday, and it's great. He even incorporated one of the best parts of his book, The Truth (with jokes). No, not the hilarious Rumsfeld-overuses-rhetorical-questions routine, but when he talks about his wife's family, government, and progressives' promise to America.

The story goes that when Franni, Al's wife, was just a baby when her father died in a car accident, leaving her mother to care for five kids. Franni's mom worked at a grocery store along with raising that family. She made lots of sacrifices, but as Franken says, they "made it because of Social Security survivor benefits." Franni's sisters went on to college, thanks to Pell Grants and other scholarships, and her brother learned electrical engineering in the Coast Guard.

Franni's family became productive members of society in part because society felt it had a responsibility to them.

In those days, the Democrats in power had come up during the 1920s, and were witnesses to an era of conservative dominance and appeals to apathy. Harding called for a "Return to Normalcy" -- the anti-rallying cry for those who loathed progress. Coolidge had asked voters to "Keep Cool," and stay the uninspired course. By 1932, it was clear the Republicans had failed to provide a decent level of security and competency to satisfy the public, and they were soundly defeated in that year's elections. A realignment of American politics and values was at hand.

Those who came into power believed government should take an active role in fighting poverty and economic spoil. Franklin Roosevelt and the Democratic Congress passed laws to create jobs through public works programs. They supported the impoverished, sick and the aged through Social Security and federal housing. They sought regulation for the big businesses, and subsidies for the small ones.

This bureaucracy was created not out of want for government, but need. For FDR's New Deal placed additional human rights in the canon of American ideals. An American had the right not to starve. An American had the right to adequate shelter. An American had the right to security in old age. Roosevelt proclaimed the freedoms from fear and want in the same breath with the freedoms of speech and religion -- ideals cherished since the country's founding. This governing philosophy redefined liberalism and created the compassionate and prosperous Twentieth Century America.

These were the values of the men and women who shaped America when Franken and his wife were born, but as he says in his video, "It's different now than it was for me and Franni."

When Franni's sisters were using them to go to college, Pell Grants paid for 90% of a college education. Today, they pay for 40%. And President Bush, with the help of his Republican allies in Congress, have even tried to privatize Social Security. You should have heard Franni when they tried to do that.

It's different for middle-class families, too. These families are being squeezed harder and harder every year. Maybe you know what it's like to be one health crisis away from bankruptcy. Maybe you, or your parents or grandparents, can't afford prescriptions. Maybe you have kids, and you're worried about paying for their college. Maybe someone you love is in Iraq, and you don't know how long they'll have to stay there, or what will happen when they come home.

Middle-class families today struggle with that feeling of insecurity -- the sense that things can fall apart without notice, outside of your control.

Your government should have your back. That should be our mission in Washington, the one FDR gave us during another challenging time: freedom from fear.

Exactly. Democrats should maintain the spirit of FDR's freedoms, not deny them. And that's why it's so disappointing to see the Third Way come out this week to blast populist Democrats for disagreeing with their definition of a "New Rules Economy."

Basically, the Third Way paints the populist platform as a sham, "premised on the myths of a failing middle class, a declining America, and omnipotent corporations."

For example, by looking at household incomes of only working age families, Third Way found that median income was around $70,000 per year, not the $45,000 that most progressive economists cite. The typical household also held no credit card debt, experienced relatively little income volatility, and was satisfied with its economic circumstances.
Elizabeth Warren tears this report's methods apart (they cut out wide swaths of the population), and it should also be noted that in the past 15 years, credit card debt has tripled because more and more Americans use them to pay for basic amenities like food and health care.

But their rhetoric aside, many of the Third Way's policy proposals seem to be in the spirit of FDR's freedoms from want and fear. Maybe their strong words for populists have less to do with ideology and more to do with political posturing? They, too, came up in an era of conservative dominance, except unlike FDR's contemporaries, they bowed to the right. Even as the Republicans stray absurdly from the mainstream, veering to the rhetorical right of other Democrats is the Third Way's basest political instinct.

Either way, it's exciting to have candidates and elected officials who speak the way Franken does. It's good for America, good for FDR's freedoms, and quite possibly, good for the Third Way. After all, the more Democrats who sound FDR's freedoms means the more Democrats the Third Way can claim to be more conservative than.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
7:06:47 AM    comment []

Pre-war Intelligence Came From Magic 8-Ball - New Documents Reveal Ball[base ']s Influence in White House. Much of the pre-war intelligence that led to President George W. Bush[base ']s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 came from the popular fortune-telling toy known as the Magic 8-Ball, according to documents released today. By Andy Borowitz . [Borowitz Report]
7:03:12 AM    comment []

Lawrence O'Donnell

02.15.2007

Libby is guilty. And he's going to be found guilty. The jury might not convict him on all counts, but he has no chance of surviving the perjury count that was proved beyond a reasonable doubt with Tim Russert's testimony.

The multi-million dollar defense, which provided no defense at all, did not call Libby to the witness stand for one very simple reason: Libby is very very guilty. Publicly, defense lawyers cling to the text book theory that the defendant has no burden of proof and that no negative inference should ever be taken when a defendant doesn't defend himself on the witness stand. Practically, every defense lawyer knows that the jury desperately wants to hear from the defendant and that the only reason not to put him on the stand is that he is soooo guilty that every answer he gives after his name will eradicate any shred of reasonable doubt. Think about it. Your whole life is at stake in the outcome of a criminal trial. You're innocent. And you don't testify in your own defense? Around the courthouse when defense lawyers are chatting about their cases, the only question they ask each other is can you put your guy on the stand? Those conversations always assume the defendant is guilty. The question is just about the degree of difficulty in presenting a defense.

Libby's defense gave up before the opening statements in the trial. They always knew Libby was too guilty to put on the witness stand. And they were never going to call the Vice President. Telling the judge that they were going to call Libby and Cheney was just a mirage they were trying to create to misdirect Patrick Fitzgerald's focus. I'd be shocked if Fitzgerald was fooled for even a second.

If Libby called Cheney, it actually would have hurt his defense and been a hostile act to the White House. Cheney would have been humiliated by Fitzgerald's cross-examination and Libby would have forever lost his chief pardon advocate in the White House.

From the start, Libby's hopeless courtroom defense has been about the pardon. Libby has conducted a defense that is very friendly to the White House. He has made it clear to the White House that he had the power to call the Vice President, but, good soldier that he is, he declined to put Cheney through that ordeal.

Last year, I told Keith Olbermann on MSNBC that Libby's highly publicized defense-fund fundraiser was really the first step in the pardon campaign. Libby is a very rich man. He didn't need the defense fund. He needed the public rally with Mary Matalin types walking the virtual red carpet on the way in singing his praises as a great public servant. Fred Thompson, the senator-actor, did a version of this at the trial--showing up, giving "moral" support, then offering his TV prosecutor view of how unfair the Libby prosecution is. Look for the popular TV prosecutor to play an important role in the pardon campaign.

Libby knows more than his lawyers do about the next stage of his legal proceedings. Libby helped obtain the sleaziest pardon that Bill Clinton issued on his way out of the White House. Clinton pardoned Libby's client, the fugitive billionaire Marc Rich, over the unanimous objections of the White House staff. When Cheney hand-delivers Libby's pardon application to President Bush, who is going to object?
7:02:27 AM    comment []


© Copyright 2007 Patricia Thurston.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


February 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28      
Jan   Mar