Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog :
Updated: 4/1/07; 7:57:10 AM.

 

Subscribe to "Pat Thurston's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Mark Kleiman: Playing with fire.

White House consel Fred Fielding, having promised an answer by today to Congressional requests for documents and testimony, announced he needed more time to think about it. John Conyers and Linda Chavez, chairs respectively of the House Judiciary Committee and the relevant subcommittee, said that while he was thinking they'd be sending subpoenas.

I can think of only three interpretations:

1. Fielding and the rest of the Bushoids haven't yet adjusted to the fact that Capitol Hill is no longer a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bush & Co.

2. Incompetence is so deeply ingrained in the culture of Bush and the people around him that they can't do anything right, even when their political lives are on the line. (See also "Iraq, occupation of.")

3. There's something so poisonous in the documents or in whatever parts of people's memories haven't suddenly become "hazy" that it's worth a losing battle over subpoenas just to kick the can down the road for a few weeks. Note that this would have to be worse than the stuff that's already come out of DoJ. Best bet on this option: an email that specifically refers to Carol Lam's indictment of Dusty Foggo or to the broadening of that investigation to include House Appropriations Committee chairman Jerry Lewis. That would bring the scandal clearly into "obstruction of justice" territory, with a possibility of seeing the long-awaited Karl Rove frog-march.

It's not true that the cover-up is always more damaging than the crime. Sometimes the crime is so bad that it's better to take the heat for the cover-up.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
7:18:07 AM    comment []

Steve Young: Fox News Apologizes For Years Of Erroneous Plamegate Reporting....

...if this were Bizzaro World.

When the Vice President's Chief of Staff was on trial, Bill O'Reilly claimed that it was a non-story which would go away quickly. "No one I know is interested in this," said Bill, not giving it much mention until the day the verdict came in. Wonder how many days he would have appropriated if it was George Soros who was on trial.

Friday, Valerie Plame came to tell her story UNDER OATH on the Hill and explained that every bit of slime smeared on and about her was either an intended lie or plain wrong. Bill never mentioned Plame nor the story on his radio show Friday but did find time to continue his attack on the "possible" lies the New York Times "might" have told in an immigration editorial and that it "could" be a huge scandal.

There were no mights, possiblys or coulds in Plame's testimony.

Plame said UNDER OATH that, in essence, every Fox expert and host who for years came on to muddy Plame's words and reputation was misinformed and misinforming.

One of those Foxperts has been Victoria Toensing, a Bush apologist who was one of the drafters of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, which she said proved that Plame could not be covert; that she could not be because in the five years before she was outed she did not work out of the country for the CIA. That would be taken as gospel by Fox enthusiasts and any media outlet who brought Townsing on until Friday when Toensing admitted UNDER OATH, that she came to her conclusion without asking Plame or THE CIA! UNDER OATH, Plame testified that she was indeed out of the country while working under cover for the CIA, which Toensig would have found out, if she had only ASKED THE CIA. Toensing, who had been hauled in front of any camera Fox could set up to trash Plame and her husband, Joseph Wilson, also seems to have forgotten to ask CIA Director Gen. Michael V. Hayden, about her claim. In a statement read in the hearing and approved by Hayden, the CIA head man substantiated that Plame's claim that she WORKED IN A COVERT CAPACITY AT THE TIME OF NOVAK'S COLUMN. Let me repeat that. The person in charge of the agency where Toensing said Plame could not have been covert at the time Novak outed her, said Plame was, in fact, covert.

Except for those UNDER OATH facts, Toensing's propaganda, was right on the money.

Friday, while Plame testified, a Fox anchor asked Bob Novak - who publicly outed Plame - how HE felt when Plame said she felt like she was hit in the stomach when she read his column outing her. An affable and compassionate Prince of Darkness said that "the idea that [Plame] was a covert operator working on covert operations when she was going to the CIA building every day is absurd." Guess Bob will now be pushing for an indictment of Plame, since she said she was covert UNDER OATH!

On Fox News Live, host E.D. Hill (who doubles as O'Reilly yes ma'am on his Radio Factor) reported that "it sounded like Plame's testimony complete skirted the issue of whether she still fell under those rules of being considered covert." Which would be exactly right if it wasn't for the fact that Plame testified THAT SHE WAS "COVERT" UNTIL NOVAK PUBLICLY OUTED HER!

O'Reilly, who never misses a chance to say that he'll go after the bad guys, hadn't even flinched over the possibility that high-ups in this administration had spread a CIA agent's name around. An agent, mind you, who more and more seems to read "covert"; at least if you ask anyone at the CIA...which again, I should remind you, is one place TOENSING NEVER ASKED. BillO felt that this little piece of information didn't call for even a mention, yet he had time to spend another day raking the NY Times across the coals for what they MIGHT have done.

Ranking Republican, Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (Va.), thought the guilt didn't lie with the administration. "This looks to me more like a CIA problem than a White House problem," Davis maintained that the agency should have made sure that White House officials who inquired about Plame knew that her position was classified, which should give grist for the O'Reilly's "Talking Point" this Monday...

"Why didn't the CIA, who everyone knows wants the Democrats to win, ask the White House if they were planning a hit job against one of their agents? The Folks want to know."

Steve Young is the author of "Great Failures of the Extremely Successful" (www.greatfailure.com) and his column appears in the LA Daily News Sunday Opinion page...to the left of O'Reilly's...really. His next book, "The Power of Satire...The Secret Weapon That Can Win The 2008 Election For The Candidate Who Is Less Of A Joke Than The Other," threatens to be finished any day.

[The Huffington Post | Full Blog Feed]
7:17:38 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2007 Patricia Thurston.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Feb   Apr