Seb's Open Research
Pointers and thoughts on the evolution of knowledge sharing
and social software, collected by Sébastien Paquet

Webfeed (?)
email me

My keywords
My popular pieces
Stories and articles
2002 weekly archives
2003 weekly archives
2004 weekly archives
Neighborhood tour
Technorati cosmos
Blogstreet profile
Today's referers
Seb's home

My other weblogs:
Many-to-Many: Social Software groupblog
My public mailbox
My 'Quantum Bits' blog
En français SVP!

Montreal, QC
Social Software
Augmented Social Net
Emergent Democracy
New webloggers

Research Blogs
Minciu Sodas
First Monday
AmSci E-Prints
Weblog Kitchen
Knowledge Board
Weblogs at Harvard
EduBlogging Network
Reputations Research
Know-How Wiki

JC Perreault
Smart Mobs
Blue Oxen
Web Tools- Learning

with a weblog

Spike Hall
Chris Dent
John Baez
Bill Tozier
Erik Duval
Clay Shirky
Jill Walker
Jim McGee
David Tosh
danah boyd
Sylvie Noël
John Taylor

Ton Zijlstra
Joseph Hart
Ed Bilodeau
Peter Suber
David Deutsch
David Brake
Steve Cayzer
Lilia Efimova
Mark Hemphill
Alex Halavais
Mike Axelrod
Paul Resnick
Cosma Shalizi
Andrew Odlyzko
Lance Fortnow
Tom Munnecke
Henk Ellermann
Mark Bernstein
Jeremy Hiebert
Jacques Distler
Michael Nielsen
Thomas N. Burg
Hassan Masum
Ian Glendinning
Marc Eisenstadt
George Siemens
Howard Rheingold
Stephen Downes
John Bethencourt
Sebastian Fiedler
Kevin Schofield
José Luis Orihuela
Martin Terre Blanche
Elizabeth Lane Lawley
Paul Cox
Jon Udell
Don Park
*Alf Eaton
Lion Kimbro
Phil Wolff
Jay Cross
Julian Elvé
Matt Webb
Adina Levin
*Marc Canter
Matt Mower
Kevin Kelly
Dina Mehta
Greg Searle
Ross Dawson
Al Delgado
Rajesh Jain
Lee Bryant
Jesse Hirsh
David Sifry
Jeff Bridges
Stowe Boyd
Walter Chaw
Piers Young
Barbara Ray
Dave Pollard
Ian McKellen
Josep Cavallé
Hylton Jolliffe
Lucas Gonze
Jerry Michalski
Chris Corrigan
Boris Anthony
Michael Fagan
Mary Messall
Denham Grey
*Ross Mayfield
*Phillip Pearson
Whiskey River
David Gurteen
Tom Portante
Chris Wenham
Pierre Omidyar
Stuart Henshall
Greg Costikyan
David Gammel
Renee Hopkins

Peter Van Dijk
Peter Lindberg
Michael Balzary
Steven Johnson
Robert Paterson
Eugene Eric Kim
Jason Lefkowitz
*Flemming Funch
Bernie DeKoven
Edward De Bono
Maciej Ceglowski
Charles Cameron
Christopher Allen
*Philippe Beaudoin
Richard MacManus
The Homeless Guy
Ward Cunningham
Hossein Derakhshan
Stewart Butterfield
Stefano Mazzocchi
Evan Henshaw-Plath
Gary Lawrence Murphy
Karl Dubost
*Dolores Tam
Norbert Viau
Patrick Plante
Daniel Lemay
Sylvain Carle
Bertrand Paquet - Hydro-Québec
Michel Dumais
Mario Asselin
Robert Grégoire
Roberto Gauvin
Clément Laberge
Stéphane Allaire
Gilles Beauchamp
Jean-Luc Raymond
without a weblog
Steve Lawrence
Simon B. Shum
Stevan Harnad
Brian Martin
John Suler
Christopher Alexander
Johanne Saint-Charles
Douglas Hofstadter
John Seely Brown
Murray Gell-Mann
Steve Newcomb
Howard Gardner
Anthony Judge
Patrick Lambe
Donald Knuth
Phil Agre
Jim Pitman
Chris Kimble
Peter Russell
Roger Schank
Howard Bloom
John McCarthy
John C. Thomas
Doug Engelbart
Seymour Papert
Hossein Arsham
W. Brian Arthur
N. David Mermin
Tommaso Toffoli
Brian Eno
Will Wright
Jean Leloup
Daniel Boucher
Daniel Bélanger
Laurence J. Peter
Plume Latraverse
George Pólya
Thomas Kuhn
Edsger Dijkstra
Hermann Hesse
Abraham Maslow
Benjamin Franklin
Shiyali Ranganathan
Andrey Kolmogorov
Jiddu Krishnamurti
Georges Brassens
Bertrand Russell
Astor Piazzolla
Kurt Cobain

Google Search
Fagan Finder Blogs

Google Glossary

NEC ResearchIndex e-prints
SEP Bibliography
citebase search

Complexity Digest
Principia Cybernetica

All Consuming
gnod musicmap
Logical Fallacies
W3C Link Checker
Wayback Machine
RemindMe Service

Music streams:
Radio Tango Argentino
Boombastic Radio
Limbik Frequencies
Radio Paradise
shoutcast streams
electronic streams index


Subscribe with Bloglines

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.



Friday, April 25, 2003
Ryan Eby's new blog

is called Education and Technology, was started this month, and looks quite interesting.
What do you think? []  links to this post    1:15:28 AM  
The dynamics of ridiculously easy group-forming

Very interesting exchange between David Sifry and Gary Lawrence Murphy on what happens when everyone is empowered to create open channels where any blogger can contribute content. (I believe the Internet Topic Exchange is the first implementation of that idea.)

What Gary writes is similar to the (private) reasoning that led me to decide that the ridiculously easy group-forming idea was probably worth an experiment or two.

But here again, people are driven by two competing objectives, one to be uniquely differentiated, the other to be found in a group, so as these top topics grow to unmanageable size (themselves flatten out), people will fork them, recursively repeating the top-level problem, eventually moving into a deeper hierarchy they see as still likely to attract those who got as far as that hot topic just above them. In the long run, chaos will anneal to a solution.

Ditto for the synonym problem: If two directories have lexically different topics that are similar, and both directories grow in popularity, it won't take long before people learn of the other and double-classify their blog into both taxonomies ... and by being present in both, they inadvertently create the needed bubble bridge our spider robots can use to suss out the semantic relationship.

Why didn't this happen with the Meta tags? Simple: There was no feedback. No vehicles grew up to take advantage of any of those meta tags (except description being used for bookmarks) and as a result (except for description) no one really took them seriously.

I'm really happy that Gary should put on his systems thinking had and bring up feedback again. I believe the issue of feedback is quite fundamental and deserves more attention than it generally gets right now. For instance, I doubt blogging would have taken off nearly as fast as it did had it not been for the availability of referer data, which effectively closes the loop between writing and perceiving an effect and is a great source of reinforcement.

In a recent short piece called "Towards Structured Blogging" I speculated that designing with feedback in mind - that is, being careful to harmoniously mesh the "publish" and "subscribe" activities - might help build community and at the same time drive people to author metadata.

Yes, open channels do get polluted. The issue is, should we filter them? If so, how? Here are my quick observations on this, which I hope to be able to expand upon sometime:

  1. It is always possible to keep the raw feed accessible in case anyone wants to know what they're missing by following a filtered feed.
  2. Filtered feeds are derived products of raw feeds. As nobody owns the raw feed, everybody can use it, and anybody can improve it, an arbitrary number of filtered versions may coexist. They will compete against one another (and against the original feed) for readers.
  3. Filtering can be done by a single person, a group, a software entity, or a mix of those.
  4. The simplest filtering method is for a single person to appoint herself as an editor and select posts for inclusion in a derivative feed. The load could also be distributed across a group. This is akin to moderation in a mailing list - except that there can be as many moderator slots as there are people who are willing to moderate.
  5. Given that we now have tools like the blogging ecosystem and Technorati that give a rough measure of how many people "trust" sources, a potentially worthwhile and completely automated filtering method would consist in the following. First, the reader requests a certain "reputation rank" threshold (say, 10 inbound blogs). Then the system simply culls out posts whose sources fail to meet the threshold from the raw feed. The decision of where to set the threshold is up to the reader, who can check out what he's missing by selecting a different threshold.
  6. Different individuals will want to adopt different filtering behaviors, depending on the throughput of a given raw feed, how much time they have on their hands, and their degree of interest in the topic at hand.
  7. In a loosely joined group, the fragmentation resulting from the fact that no two people experience the feed in the exact same way might not be something to worry about. No two people even experience an identical feed in the same way, anyways.

What do you think? []  links to this post    12:54:06 AM  

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Copyleft 2006 Sebastien Paquet.
Last update: 4/22/2006; 12:09:16 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.

April 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Mar   May

Syndicated content: