Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog
Computers, freedom, and anything else that comes to mind.









Subscribe to "Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Wednesday, January 12, 2005
 

The Newton: Failure?.

Top Ten PDA Failures: I guess I take exception to the Apple Newton being on this list. Yes, it failed, but it was the failure that got everyone thinking about what was possible. In that sense, it was like the Tucker of PDAs.

Perhaps one of the most ambitious tech projects in recent times, Apple spent hundreds of millions of dollars on devices that were at first ridiculed, then ignored. The Newton was disparaged because of its inaccurate handwriting recognition, which was fixed in later versions, and it was never able to live down its reputation.

I still remember sitting on the back steps of a classroom at Camp Pendleton, CA where I was on my two weeks active duty requirement at the time. This would have been summer of 1994. Some guy had a Newton and everyone was crowded around him to see what it did. I watched in amazement as he scribbled over some text and it disappeared in a little puff of "smoke." I was blown away.

Sadly, I also remember the Doonesbury strip that made fun of the handwriting recognition. I found an old scan of the seminal panel from his strip here. "Egg Freckles"?

Incidentally, I also stumbled across the CNet article from 1998 announcing the death of Newton.

Ah, memories. Via OSNews.

[Gadgetopia]

It's interesting to note that the other nine items were failures for technical or market reasons, whereas the Newton was a technical and (by the time it was cancelled) market success. The Newton was a "failure" solely because Steve Jobs didn't like it.

I think the Palm and PocketPC OSes will be joining the "failure" list soon. These devices were never very useful, but I used to see people at least bring them to meetings, even if they sat untouched the entire time while notes were taken on yellow legal pads. Now they've vanished entirely, replaced by cell phones that incorporate what few features Palm and PocketPC devices had.
1:30:42 PM    comment ()


Cutting the Gordian knot. One of the current controversies around the war on terror is how to treat the prisoners. Dale Franks at the excellent Questions and Observations blog gets it pretty much right, I think. My preferred method of dealing with these terror prisoners would be to get two captains and a major together as a tribunal, declare them to be unlawful combatants, and put them in front of a firing squad. Now, maybe, because we're nice guys,... [Samizdata.net]

For anyone who thinks that the torture and murder of prisoners by the Feds is an anomaly, and not representative of what America has become, here we have a bunch of crusaders openly advocating the murder of prisoners. Caveat: some of the murderous lunatics commenting on this post are British.
12:43:28 PM    comment ()


Gmail Messages Are Vulnerable To Interception. Michael Wally writes "GMail messages are vulnerable to interception. An attacker has only to transmit malformed test messages to himself, and information left over in memory, from previous messages destined for other people, will appear with the test messages, in the attacker's inbox. Sometimes, this information may include usernames and passwords... Do you use GMail? Are you communications private? Should they be? Well, here's what we figured out about the issue, that may or may not help you - or perhaps GMail, if anyone can get ahold of their developers, to tell them about it." [Slashdot]

Of course they're vulnerable to intercept--all email is vulnerable to intercept. If your email is not encrypted, it is not private at all. All that web-based systems like GMail do is make it marginally easier to intercept messages.

I do have a GMail account which I use occasionally as a backup for my main account, but I certainly don't consider it private or secure. That's what PGP is for.
11:50:15 AM    comment ()



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Ken Hagler.
Last update: 2/15/2006; 2:04:12 PM.
January 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Dec   Feb