|
Sam Ruby writes:
Dave, I guess your target audience is people like myself and Jon Udell who "have for years been in the game of dynamically generating statically-served sites". What about the hordes of unwashed masses who aren't so inclined and seem to prefer Integrated Development Environments (IDEs)? Wouldn't the world be a better place if there was some widely adopted way to describe the messages in some structured way amenable to consumption by such tools?
It's true we are geeks who will hack page templates in vim or emacs. This incarnation of Radio, though, delivers the basics -- not just simple blogging, but also receiving/filtering/annotating/retransmitting flow -- in a manner that I think will be directly approachable by the proverbial "mom".
Richer descriptions of messages, and tools that exploit those richer descriptions, will make life even better for "mom" -- if this extra sophistication doesn't gum up the works.
Is WSDL gum, or grease, or maybe a little of both?
7:03:53 PM 
|
