Coyote Gulch

 



















































































Subscribe to "Coyote Gulch" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

e-mail John: Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Sunday, September 9, 2007


? for President?

Political Wire: "Oprah Winfrey 'rolled out the red carpet Saturday for Barack Obama at a gala fundraiser attended by high-wattage stars that was expected to raise $3 million for the Democratic presidential candidate,' reports the AP.

"'The most powerful woman in show business celebrated her favorite candidate with 1,500 guests at her palatial estate in this coastal enclave south of Santa Barbara. Tickets to the sold-out private event went for $2,300 apiece, keeping them within campaign finance limits.'

"'Stevie Wonder performed for guests, who included Sidney Poitier, Forest Whitaker, Chris Rock, Cindy Crawford, Jimmy Connors, Linda Evans, Dennis Haysbert and many others. Will Smith, Jamie Foxx and Halle Berry also were expected, though it was unclear if they were in attendance. The media were barred from the fundraiser.'"

"2008 pres"
4:16:49 PM     


Iraq

Captain's Quarters: "The Washington Post tells the story of the surge from inside the Bush administration in a lengthy and intriguing article. Headlined as "Among Top Officials, 'Surge' Has Sparked Dissent, Infighting," the compendium from the Post's reporters actually tells quite a different story. While the surge initially produced dissent -- even within the military command -- the results have united the administration and the military more than at any time over the last eight months."

"2008 pres"
4:14:18 PM     


Denver: Tax increases and bond issues on fall ballot

Say hello to Better Denver. They're opposed to the tax increases and bond issues on the fall ballot in Denver. They are claiming that it will cost homeowners of an average home $2,380 over 20 years for the owner of the average Denver home valued at $255,000 if everything passes. That's a lot of dough for some households.

They also cite the huge overruns and outright failure of many past projects. From a Face the State report cited on Better Denver:

Over the last four years, Denver taxpayers have approved more than 13 fee or tax increases at a estimated cost of more than $280 million in additional taxes to the city's residents and visitors.

Denver's most restrained year for tax increases, 2003, saw taxpayers approve two property tax increases, including Initiative 100, which raised property taxes by $6.5 million annually to fund services for the developmentally disabled. In addition, Referred Question 1A raised property taxes annually by another $14 million for Denver Health Medical Center bonds.

The following year, 2004, brought four tax increases to Denver, including two statewide raises and two for special districts. Amendment 35, an increased tax on tobacco, has brought in an estimated $175 million statewide. With 12 percent of the state's population, and a much larger share of the state's work force commuting to the city each day, taxpayers here shelled out more than $21 million.

Also in 2004, Denver voters approved an extension of the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District sales and use tax. Denver's 2006 portion, according to SCFD, came to nearly $12 million. Denver voters also approved an extension of RTD's FasTracks light rail system, at an estimated annual cost of more than $37 million.

The added tax burden is reflected in part by a significant growth in Denver's general fund tax revenues. The city's tax receipts increased $23.57 million year-over-year in 2005 and another $26.84 million in 2006. This doesn't even include the myriad increases to special districts such as RTD and SCFD over the same time frame.

In 2005, Denver voters passed five measures to give government more money, including a new Justice Center, giving the city $17 million for the project. Specifically, voters gave up what would have been a $17,328,000 reduction in property taxes due to other bonds being paid off, opting instead to continue being taxed at the previous level in order to fund the new bonds.

Voters also decided to increase Denver Public Schools teacher pay for performance, adding $25 million per year to their property taxes.

Referendum C, the largest tax increase in Colorado history, passed with 52 percent support statewide. Denver voters, however, gave it 65 percent approval. At the time of the measure's passage, proponents estimated it would allow the state to keep $3.7 billion in tax money over five years. Absent the vote, the state would have had to return the funds to taxpayers, as required under the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights, which limits government spending.

In reality, the measure has cost taxpayers much more. With state revenues up, the Office of State Planning and Budgeting, is now projecting that the State will be able to keep an additional $2 billion, for a total of $5.35 billion. Denver's portion, based on current projections under the department's most recent budget report, will amount to an estimated $642 million, or nearly $129 million per year for five years.

Also in 2005, Denver voters responded positively when asked by City Council to approve a 10-year exemption from TABOR on city sales and use taxes, and other non-tax revenue such as to fines. While property taxes were excluded, representatives from the city's budget office told the council's finance committee that the total cost to taxpayers would amount to $5 million annually. The effects of this 10-year exemption will be felt far into the future, since it included a provision to reset the TABOR base (the point from which statutory tax and spending limit increases are calculated) at the highest level attained during the exemption period. This same year, voters also raised taxes on visitors to the city, increasing the "Lodger's Tax" on hotel rooms.

The 2006 election presented two irresistible tax increases, although the first was not billed as such. The 20-year Public Service Franchise Fee renewal contained a new provision that charged the fee on 100 percent of residents' utility bills, as opposed to the old agreement, which exempted the first $12.50 of every bill from the fee. The resulting increase is estimated to translate into $2 million in additional revenue for the city, according to a pro/con fact sheet distributed by Councilwoman Jeanne Faatz. Voters in 2006 also decided to increase their sales and use taxes by $12 million annually to add public funding for preschool education.

In total, over the last four elections, Denver taxpayers have approved at least $281.6 million in increased taxes and fees[~]not including increased taxes from the city's lodging tax.

While such an increase is substantial, city residents and visitors should get ready for more. A recent report from the Finance Committee of the Mayor's Infrastructure Priorities Task Force recommends that the city raise property taxes by another $27 million per year to fund infrastructure projects. The report also recommends that the city plan future debt issuances to "take maximum advantage of retiring debt that is within the 'no new tax rate' threshold", meaning there is no relief in sight for Denver's taxpayers as current bonds are paid off, in the near or distant future.

A note about the numbers: Unless otherwise indicated, the tax amounts listed here are from ballot language presented to voters when the taxes were approved, or from official city estimates.

"denver n2007"
10:24:40 AM     


Super Ditch for Southeastern Colorado?
A picture named lowerarkansasriver.jpg

Here's an update on the proposed "Super Ditch" for the lower Arkansas River Basin in Colorado, from The Pueblo Chieftain. From the article:

The prospect of drying up another 72,000 acres of farmland in the Arkansas River basin is the driving force behind the study of a "Super Ditch" by the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District. In its application for $150,000 through a water supply reserve account to continue studies of the Super Ditch - a land fallowing, water lease management program to be run by irrigators - the Lower Ark cites figures from the Statewide Water Supply Initiative that indicate 98,000 acre-feet of additional water supply will be needed by cities by 2030.

If farms are dried up, that could mean up to 72,000 acres of land taken out of production in addition to 78,169 acres already dried up by municipal transfers if alternatives are not employed. That would represent 13.4 percent on top of the 14.5 percent of available farmland already dried up in the valley, according to the application. The application is scheduled to come up for a vote of the Arkansas Basin Roundtable at 12:30 p.m. Wednesday public meeting at the Occhiato University Center at Colorado State University-Pueblo. From there, it would still need approval of the Interbasin Compact Committee and the Colorado Water Conservation Board.

"This is a very forward-looking application," said Jay Winner, Lower Ark executive director and also chairman of the roundtable's needs assessment committee. "This is the strongest application to come out of the roundtable. It addresses the SWSI gap, which is a primary mission of the roundtable and goal of the CWCB."[...]

According to its application, the water supply reserve account funds would be used for looking at economic and engineering questions, some of which would be related to a change of use case in Division 2 water court. "The goal is to find consensus," Winner said...

At the August meeting of the roundtable, some members objected to the possibility of state funds providing research for a court case which the groups they represent could oppose. The Lower Ark has revised its application to allow for groups like the Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District to verify its engineering reports, Winner said. "The overarching goal of this task is to avoid litigation by developing consensus and collaboration for future water court applications necessary to the implementation of the program," the application stated. The Lower Ark has used HDR Engineering for its studies to date, but the application explained changes in personnel may require a change. "There's funding built in to help the Upper Ark find its own engineer, if that's what it takes," Winner added.

Winner also addressed the concerns raised by the City of Pueblo about the potential that flows in the Arkansas River below Pueblo Dam could be affected by exchanges that would be needed to make Super Ditch work, saying the application would not look at issues directly related to an exchange case in water court.

More Coyote Gulch coverage here.

"colorado water"
9:22:03 AM     


? for President?

Here's the first YouTube to go negative on recently announced Fred Thompson from Brave New Films via the Daily Kos. Warning: Fred Thompson fans might not get the joke.

"2008 pres"
9:04:26 AM     



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2009 John Orr.
Last update: 3/14/09; 9:34:23 PM.

September 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Aug   Oct

Google


e-mail John: Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.