
Not everyone is happy with HB1124 - The Rotational Crop Management Bill, according to the Pueblo Chieftain. From the article, "Area water officials are leery of a bill that would allow water judges to approve rotational crop management contracts, or land 'fallowing' plans.
While supporters have lauded the bill for allowing farmers to enter into contracts with cities to lease water, critics say the bill wouldn't allow anything not currently permitted under substitute water supply plans already in place. At worst, it could allow cities to 'cherry pick' senior water rights...
"'This will keep more farmers on the farm because, what's happening now, cities are buying up whole farms and drying them up,' Hodge said. 'That takes the John Deere dealer out. It takes the school out. It takes a community out. This just allows people to stay in business. they can use water as a cash crop and they can still farm.'
"While it's hard to argue with that sentiment, the bill does more than just present opportunities to farmers. It could also tie up senior agricultural water rights to benefit large cities while leaving diminished opportunities for other farmers, critics say...
"Hodge said the current state rule that limits ag transfers to three years out of 10 does not give farmers enough flexibility. The bill would not eliminate the three-in-10 rule, but would allow some water rights to be leased more frequently under a court decree...
"While the bill would limit water taken off the land to historical consumptive use, or the amount needed to raise a crop, it would allow farmers to continue to irrigate with the remaining water not used, if specified under a contract.
Consumptive use credits are generally used as a yardstick now in substitute supply leases and water use change cases in court. The new law would apparently change how those are administered in rotational crop management contracts, however."
Category: Colorado Water
6:57:44 AM
|