|
Monday, September 06, 2004 |
Data showing that OA increases citation impact. Tim Brody, Citation Analysis in the Open Access World,
a preprint. Excerpt: "OA is now firmly on the agenda for funding
agencies, universities, libraries and publishers. What is needed now is
objective, quantitative evidence of the benefits of OA to authors to
researchers, their institutions, their funders and to research itself.
Web-based analysis of usage and citation patterns is providing this
evidence. One of the many misconceptions about the OA debate is that it
is primarily about economics. Although the journal
pricing/affordability problem certainly helped draw attention to OA, it
has now become a distraction from the deeper problem: the research
access/impact problem....[E]very potential user that an article loses
is lost potential impact for its author, its author's institution, its
research-funder, and for research itself....[Summarizing the data:]
Articles with OA versions consistently receive more citations than
those that do not. This OA advantage is biggest within the year before
and the two years after an article is published (an early-access
pre-print advantage followed by a new-article post-print advantage),
but older OA articles also continue to be cited more in these fields." [Open Access News]
10:57:05 PM Google It!.
|
|
© Copyright 2004 Bruce Landon.
|