| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
xml
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tuesday, July 02, 2002Jon Udell: Web services security and XML pixie dust. "Are we just trying to XMLize Kerberos and PKI and ACLs because we hope the magic pixie dust of XML will make the pain go away?"
Posted to xml @ 8:13:34 PM ( comments)
webservice.org: Why doesn't EDi just die already? "Web services will have a tougher job convincing businesses to switch from EDI, because of their relative novelty, but you see the pieces starting to come together to prove their stability, reliability, and staying power. ...Both Web services and ebXML can offer businesses something EDI cannot, and that's flexibility. EDI transactions generally work from implementation guidelines that specify fixed message formats. That works fine, as long as you keep within your supply chain and have stable content. But business today does not always have that kind of predictability, and EDI transactions has been found difficult to map from one industry to another, and even between different segments of the same industry." Posted to services, xml @ 6:01:07 PM ( comments)
Updated 8/22/2002; 5:32:37 PM
