Updated: 01/07/2003; 7:23:10 AM.
Transforming Technology
Information of Technology that has transforming or disruptive potential
        

Wednesday, June 04, 2003

Relationships -  Where we capture our value

Traditionally we capture value in the transaction. A car salesman works in an environment where he gets no credit for me buying six cars from him over time – but that is my potential. The car salesman gets no credit for all the service work that I could send him – but that is what happens with a good relationship. The car salesman gets no credit for the referrals I give to my friends who buy the  same car – but this is what happens. So the cars salesman can easily screw me and lose all of this value. This is the main business model of our time. It misses the point that the right type of relationship can drive much more value than a single transaction. In eBay or Amazon the core is the right type of relationship. In Amazon, the customers run the sales side of the store by being the review committee. In eBay the customers run every aspect of the store and have tightly knit communities of say stamp collectors, sports car enthusiasts or golfers.

 

If you think of this, you will see that such a focus on the transaction as the sole source of value pushes the seller into an adversarial relationship with the customer. Each individual transaction will trend toward maximization. The customer has to get screwed in the end and the relationship will be lost.

 

Relationship value is not a new-age term. Every small business owner has known all about this. A small shop keeper or business man knows that it is not just the deal today that is important but the stream of deals with this customer. The small owner seeks to maximize the value of the relationship over time. He truly serves the customer and the customer feels this. What the small owner lacks is the price and the variety that a large chain can off. This is why he has been put out of business by the production model.

 

So our task is to combine the power of the large to offer price and choice with the feel of the small where the customer relationship comes first. If we do this then we will execute our main intent which is to run a big company like a small one.

 

Why will this appeal to customers today? We know that people today demand a high quality of direct participation and influence both in the workplace and as consumers. They do not want to be treated as a segment in a mass market or as a cog in an industrial  process but as individuals whose identity is affected by what they do and with whom. They want real and human relationships and will be attracted to them as employees and as customer.

 


11:14:11 PM    comment []

Some thoughts this week after finishing the "Support Economy"

Culture – The new method of competition

When Henry Ford introduced mass production at the beginning of the 20th century, he not only changed how things were made, he changed the culture of the workplace. In this production culture, head office was the organization’s brain and it decided everything. Products were conceived, designed, produced and then marketed and sold. The enterprise pushed out from the centre. This model has taken over all aspects of organized life today. At its heart is a need to control the core process. Everything and everyone had to be “managed”. It was successful during a long period of relative stability.

 

We are so imbued with this model that we mainly fail to see it for what it is – only a model which has had a life of about 100 years. Today, we have reached the design limits of this model. More efficiency cannot be squeezed out of it and the business, social and technology environments are now changing so fast that such a model cannot react fast enough.

 

A new model is emerging. It is the reverse of the production model. In this new model, which we can see in the actions of new adopters such as Wal*Mart, Amazon or Dell, the flow is reversed. The customer sets the product agenda. It is the customer who decides what they want and who drives the production process back into, not simply one organization, but into a network of suppliers organized by the host company. The new model works deliberately to eliminate, or significantly reduce, inventory, such as eBay, Dell or Southwest, or to carry inventory in a distributed form in the supporting federated system such as Wal*Mart and its suppliers. With very low or no inventory, they have a compelling cost advantage.

 

All have remarkably sensitive customer interfaces where, at best, individual customer profiles, preferences and accrued activity and trust are maintained in real time such as by Amazon, eBay and Dell. Or, profiles are held in aggregate, where community profiles are maintained such as at Wal*Mart.

 

This is not simply a re-engineering of the process but a shift in culture. It involves the giving up of the idea that the market can be controlled by head office. Head office in these organizations does not pretend to be able to predict customer behaviour, instead it works to have the best sensory system possible. It uses this acutely sensitive information system to track trends and to react immediately.

 

As a result, the customer experience has been transformed from an outward push to an inward acceptance. It is fun to fly Southwest as well as being inexpensive. Amazon provides a community of book reviewers that pulls the customer into the primary sales position in the firm. Wal*Mart greats each customer and so on. The customer gets what they want rather than only what the firm will give them.

 

In a world where most of have all that we need, in terms of things, this putting the customer into the driver’s seat give them the potential for the experience of control and participation that the old system prohibits.

 

This is the key to understand the new model. Its value is in the experience of control and participation given to the customer. For the first time, the customer is in control and not the corporation. Once customers have experienced this, they do not go back! Conversely, in the new organization, to give the customer control and participation, head office has had to give the front line control, and participation as well. Once employees have had a taste of this they too do not want to go back.

 

To pull this off, these organizations have pushed a remarkable amount of decision making power out to the front line. Floor clerks in Wal*Mart can move material around the store and each store has a computer assisted re-order model that enables the store to track orders to the unique preferences of its own community. At Dell you speak to a real person who then tracks your order all the way to set up. At eBay the buyers and sellers deal direct.

 

If you are a competitor of one of these new model firms and you are still using the old model, you will fail. You cannot deliver the costs and you cannot deliver the customer experience.

 

So we see the icons of the old model struggling or even moving into bankruptcy. United Airlines, AMR Air Canada; Kmart, Home Depot; and most small booksellers and  Indigo and Chapters. eBay is on track to dominate the second hand car market. Dell can take on any competition and is moving into other sectors beyond PC’s.

 

In the old model, you could compete by applying a simple concept – more money. By gaining access to more resources, you could use increased scale to push prices and costs down and use your increased hegemony to have power over the consumer. This is why the trend in the old model is for more scale. But now scale will not help United Airlines or Home Depot. The new model demands that you kill off your old culture, the culture that made you successful and which you know so well.

 


11:08:18 PM    comment []

David Sifry is looking for help in finding a doctor

Today at the Formosa a group of PEI Bloggers talked about the power of groups of fellow sufferers to provide us with the best health information.

Here is an old link that I found back last year from Dr Marc Pierson - what it shows that our Doctors are the poorest source of information and that self help groups are the best.

Is there not a wonderful opportunity to use Social Software to meet this need?


8:59:57 PM    comment []

© Copyright 2003 Robert Paterson.
 
June 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
May   Jul


Blogroll


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Transforming Technology" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.